SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD: 

Conduct moderation of outcomes-based assessments 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
115759  Conduct moderation of outcomes-based assessments 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Assessor Standards 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
ETDP SETA - Education, Training and Development Practices Sector Education and Training Authority 
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development Higher Education and Training 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  10 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Reregistered  2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30   2027-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard replaces: 
US ID Unit Standard Title Pre-2009 NQF Level NQF Level Credits Replacement Status
7977  Moderate Assessment  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  10  Complete 
9929  Moderate an assessment  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  12  Complete 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
This unit standard is for people who conduct internal or external moderation of outcomes-based assessments. The assessments could be in terms of outcomes defined in a number of documents, including but not limited to unit standards, exit level outcomes, assessment standards, curriculum statements and qualifications. This unit standard will contribute towards the achievement of a variety of qualifications particularly within the field of Education Training and Development Practices and Human Resource Development.

Those who have achieved this unit standard will be able to moderate assessments in terms of the relevant outcome statements and quality assurance requirements. The candidate-moderator will be able to use the prescribed Quality Assurance procedures in a fair, valid, reliable and practicable manner that is free of all bias and discrimination, paying particular attention to the three groups targeted for redress: race, gender and disability.

In particular, people credited with this unit standard are able to:
  • Demonstrate understanding of moderation within the context of an outcomes-based assessment system,
  • Plan and prepare for moderation,
  • Conduct moderation,
  • Advise and support assessors,
  • Report, record and administer moderation, and
  • Review moderation systems and processes. 

  • LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners have previous assessment experience when starting to learn towards this unit standard, and in particular, recognition for the unit standard: NLRD 115753: "Conduct outcomes-based assessments". It is recommended that candidates should achieve NLRD 115755: "Design and develop outcomes-based assessments" before attempting this unit standard:

    It is further assumed that the person has evaluative expertise within the field in which they are moderating assessments. 

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    1. This is a generic unit standard, and applies to internal and/or external moderation within all fields of learning. It is accepted that moderation happens in different ways and at different levels in different sectors, including different models for what constitutes internal versus external moderation. This standard is intended to cover any situation in which moderation occurs, whether this be internally, i.e. within the ambit of the provider-assessor, or externally through cooperating providers, or externally through professional bodies and quality assurance bodies.

    2. Assessment of candidate-moderators will only be valid for award of this unit standard if the following requirements are met:
  • Moderation is carried out for assessments that include candidates with special needs, and RPL situations. Where real assessments are not available to cover these situations, the candidate is able to demonstrate how special needs and RPL situations would be addressed within their moderation plan and process.
  • Moderation covers assessment instruments, assessment design and methodology, assessment records; assessment decisions, reporting and feedback mechanisms.
  • Moderation is carried out for assessments involving a variety of assessment techniques, such as work samples, simulations, role-plays, written items, oral, portfolios and projects.
  • Moderation activities include pre-assessment interactions with assessors, interactions during assessments and post-assessment interactions.
  • Moderation involves at least two sets of real assessment materials for the same standards and at least six assessor decisions.
  • The assessments that are moderated are in relation to a significant, meaningful and coherent outcome statement that includes assessment criteria and allows for judgements of competence in line with SAQA's definition of competence i.e. embraces foundational, practical and reflexive dimensions of competence. This means that moderation of simple, single-task assessments will not be valid for awarding this unit standard.

    3. For the purposes of assessment against this unit standard, candidate-moderators should have access to organisational assessment and moderation policies, procedures and systems. It is assumed the organisational policies and procedures are of a quality sufficient for accreditation purposes. Where candidate-moderators are assessed in organisations that do not have a moderation system in place, assessors of moderators should provide a mock system for the purposes of the assessment.

    4. This unit standard applies to all Moderators, regardless of whether a person carries out moderation internally, as part of an organisation's quality assurance system, or externally, as part of an ETQA or other process to verify assessment results supplied by the provider or assessment agency.

    Further range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. 

  • Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Demonstrate understanding of moderation within the context of an outcomes-based assessment system. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Moderation is explained in terms of its contribution to quality assured assessment and recognition systems within the context of principles and regulations concerning the NQF. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    A variety of moderation methods are described and compared in terms of strengths, weaknesses and applications. The descriptions show how moderation is intended to uphold the need for manageable, credible and reliable assessments. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Key principles of assessment are described in terms of their importance and effect on the assessment and the application of the assessment results. Examples are provided to show how moderation may be effective in ensuring the principles of assessment are upheld. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    See "Definition of Terms" for a definition of assessment principles.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Examples are provided to show how moderation activities could verify the fairness and appropriateness of assessment methods and activities used by assessors in different assessment situations. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Assessment situations for gathering evidence of abilities in problem solving, knowledge, understanding, practical and technical skills, personal and attitudinal skills and values.
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Plan and prepare for moderation. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    The planning and preparation is to take place within the context of an existing moderation system, whether internal or external, as well as an existing assessment plan. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Planning and preparation activities are aligned with moderation system requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The scope of the moderation is confirmed with relevant parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Parties include the assessors and moderating bodies where these exist.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Planning of the extent of moderation and methods of moderation ensures manageability of the process. Planning makes provision for sufficient moderation evidence to enable a reliable judgement to be passed on the assessments under review. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The contexts of the assessments under review are clarified with the assessors or assessment agency, and special needs are taken into consideration in the moderation planning. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Moderation methods and processes are sufficient to deal with all common forms of evidence for the assessments to be moderated, including evidence gathered for recognition of prior learning. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    The documentation is prepared in line with the moderation system requirements and in such a way as to ensure moderation decisions are clearly documented. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    Required physical and human resources are ensured to be ready and available for use. Logistical arrangements are confirmed with relevant role-players prior to the moderation. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Conduct moderation. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
  • Moderation to address the design of the assessment, activities before, during and after assessment, and assessment documentation.
  • Moderation to include assessments of candidates with special needs and for RPL cases. Where assessments do not include special needs or RPL cases, evidence for this may be produced through scenarios.
  • Evidence must be gathered for on-site and off-site moderation.
  • Evidence must be show candidate-moderators are able to moderate in situations where:
    - The moderation process confirms the assessment results, and where
    - The moderation process finds it cannot uphold the assessment results. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The moderation is conducted in accordance with the moderation plan. Unforeseen events are handled without compromising the validity of the moderation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The assessment instruments and process are checked and judged in terms of the extent to which the principles of good assessment are upheld. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    See "Definitions of Terms" for definitions of assessment principles.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Moderation confirms that special needs of candidates have been provided for but without compromising the requirements specified in the relevant outcome statements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The proportion of assessments selected for checking meets the quality assurance body's requirements for consistency and reliability. The use of time and resources is justified by the assessment history or record of the assessors and/or assessment agency under consideration. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Appeals against assessment decisions are handled in accordance with organisational appeal procedures. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    The moderation decision is consistent with the quality assurance body's requirements for fairness, validity and reliability of assessments to be achieved. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    The "moderation decision" includes agreement or disagreement with the results of the assessments.
    requirements include the interpretation of assessment criteria and correct application of assessment procedures.
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Advise and support assessors. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The nature and quality of advice facilitates a common understanding of the relevant outcomes and criteria, and issues related to their assessment by assessors. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The nature and quality of advice promotes assessment in accordance with good assessment principles and enhances the development and maintenance of quality management systems in line with ETQA requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Advice on quality management systems includes planning, staffing, resourcing, training and recording systems.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Support contributes towards the further development of assessors as needed. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    All communications are conducted in accordance with relevant confidentiality requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Report, record and administer moderation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Moderation findings are reported to designated role-players within agreed time-frames and according to the quality assurance body's requirements for format and content. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Role-players could include ETQA or Moderating Body personnel, internal or external moderators and assessors.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Records are maintained in accordance with organisational quality assurance and ETQA requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Confidentiality of information relating to candidates and assessors is preserved in accordance with organisational quality assurance and ETQA requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 
    Review moderation systems and processes. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Strengths and weaknesses of moderation systems and processes are identified in terms of their manageability and effectiveness in facilitating judgements on the quality and validity of assessment decisions. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Recommendations contribute towards the improvement of moderation systems and processes in line with ETQA requirements and overall manageability. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The review enhances the credibility and integrity of the recognition system. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • A candidate-moderator wishing to be assessed, against this unit standard may apply to an assessment agency, assessor or provider institution accredited by the relevant ETQA.
  • Anyone assessing a candidate-moderator against this unit standard must meet the assessor requirements of the relevant ETQA. In particular, such assessors of candidate-moderators must demonstrate that they assess in terms of the scope and context defined in all the range statements.
  • Any institution offering learning towards this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
  • External moderation of assessment will be conducted by the relevant ETQA at its discretion. 

  • UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The following knowledge is embedded within the unit standard, and will be assessed directly or indirectly through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the assessment criteria:
  • Outcomes-based education, training and development
  • The role and function of moderation - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Moderation is explained in terms of its contribution to quality assured assessment and recognition systems within the context of principles and regulations concerning the NQF.' and indirectly assessed throughout the unit standard.
  • Moderation methods - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'A variety of moderation methods are described and compared in terms of strengths, weaknesses and applications. The descriptions show how moderation is intended to uphold the need for manageable, credible and reliable assessments.' and 'Moderation methods and processes are sufficient to deal with all common forms of evidence for the assessments to be moderated, including evidence gathered for recognition of prior learning.', and indirectly assessed through application throughout the standard.
  • Principles of assessment - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Key principles of assessment are described in terms of their importance and effect on the assessment and the application of the assessment results. Examples are provided to show how moderation may be effective in ensuring the principles of assessment are upheld.', and indirectly assessed via a requirement to judge whether the principles are applied by assessors.
  • Principles and practices of RPL - assessed in terms of the requirement for candidate moderators to moderate RPL-related assessments.
  • Methods of assessment - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Examples are provided to show how moderation activities could verify the fairness and appropriateness of assessment methods and activities used by assessors in different assessment situations', and indirectly when checking the appropriateness and fairness of assessment methods used by assessors
  • Potential barriers to assessment - assessed when dealing with special needs.
  • The principles and mechanisms of the NQF - this knowledge underpins the standard
  • Assessment policies and ETQA requirements
  • Knowledge of quality assurance policy and procedures
  • Understanding of organisational or institutional contexts
  • Understanding the curriculum (where applicable). 

  • UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking: planning for contingencies, candidates with special needs, problems that arise during moderation, suggesting changes to moderation following review. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively in a team using critical and creative thinking: working with assessors and other relevant parties during moderation, as well as post-moderation. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organize and manage oneself and ones activities: planning, preparing, conducting and recording the moderation. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organize and critically evaluate information: gather, evaluate and judge evidence and the assessment process. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively: communicate with assessors and other relevant parties during moderation, and provide feedback. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Demonstrate the world as a set of related systems: understanding the impact of moderation assessment on individuals, organisations and the credibility of recognition through NQF systems. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Be culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts: plan, conduct and give feedback on moderation in a culturally sensitive manner. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    This unit standard replaces unit standard 9929, "Moderate an assessment", Level 5, 12 credits.
    This unit standard replaces unit standard 7977, "Moderate assessment", Level 6, 10 credits.

    Supplementary information

    Definition of Terms

    The following terms are defined as used within this and related unit standards:
  • Assessment: - a process in which evidence is gathered and evaluated against agreed criteria in order to make a judgement of competence for developmental and/or recognition purposes.
  • Assessment activities: - what a candidate does or is involved in as a means of producing evidence e.g. designing things, making things, repairing things, reporting on something, answering questions, solving problems, demonstrating techniques.
  • Assessment criteria: - descriptions of the required type and quality of evidence against which candidates are to be assessed.
  • Assessment design: - the analysis of defined outcomes and criteria to produce a detailed description of how an assessment should take place, including all instructions and information regarding the assessment activities and assessment methods. The product of assessment design could be termed an Assessment Guide (see definition below).
  • Assessment facilitator (or evidence facilitator): - a person who works within particular contexts, under the supervision of registered assessors, to help candidates/learners gather, produce and organise evidence for assessment.
  • Assessment Guide: - this is a complete package based on a thorough analysis of specified outcomes and criteria, assessment requirements and a particular assessment context. Assessment Guides are designed primarily for use by assessors to conduct an assessment (or possibly a series of related assessments) in terms of a significant and coherent outcome of learning e.g. a unit standard. Assessment Guides address the following key aspects in detail:
    - How will the assessment take place?
    - What is needed to make the assessment happen?
    - How will evidence be gathered, recorded and judged?
    In general, Assessment Guides include descriptions of the approach to the assessment, assessment conditions, assessment activities, instructions to assessors and candidates/learners, assessment methods, assessment instruments (e.g. scenarios, role-plays, questions, tasks), resource requirements, guidance for contextualising assessments, relevant standard operating procedures, administrative procedures, moderation requirements, assessment outcomes and criteria, observations sheets, checklists, possible or required sources of evidence and guidance on expected quality of evidence including exemplars, memoranda or rubrics.
  • Assessment instruments: - those items that an assessor uses or a candidate uses as part of the assessment e.g. scenarios with questions, case studies, description of tasks to be performed, descriptions of role play situations.
  • Assessment method: - for the most part, assessment methods relate to what an assessor does to gather and evaluate evidence. Assessment methods include observing candidates, questioning candidates, interviewing supervisors/colleagues/managers of candidates, listening to candidates, reviewing written material, testing products.
  • Assessment plan: - an assessment plan is produced at provider level, and gives an overview of the timeframes and responsibilities for assessment and moderation for the agreed delivery period. The plan addresses practical implementation details, including, for example, decisions about the clustering of certain outcomes or unit standards/outcomes for integrated assessment, any planned RPL, and the relation of assessment and moderation to delivery of modules/ programmes in terms of timeframes.
  • Assessment principles: - see more detailed definitions in next section.
  • Candidate/learner: - person whose performance is being assessed by an assessor. Such people include those who may already be competent, but who seek assessment for formal recognition (candidates), as well as those who may have completed or are in the process of completing learning programmes (learners).
  • Candidate-moderator: - the person who is being assessed against this particular unit standard.
  • Evaluative expertise: - the ability to judge the quality of a performance in relation to specified criteria consistently, reliably and with insight. Evaluative expertise implies deep subject matter understanding and knowledge about the outcomes being assessed at a theoretical and practical level, but does not necessarily include practical ability in the outcome.
  • Evidence: - tangible proof produced by or about individuals, that can be perceived with the senses, bearing a direct relationship to defined outcomes and criteria, based on which judgements are made concerning the competence of individuals. Evidence includes plans, products, reports, answers to questions, testimonials, certificates, descriptions of observed performances, peer review reports.
  • Evidence facilitator: - see assessment facilitator
  • Moderation: - a process that supports and evaluates the assessment environment, process and instruments with a view to confirming the reliability and authenticity of assessment results and improving the quality of assessments and assessors.
  • Performance: - includes demonstration of skills, knowledge, understanding and attitudes, and the ability to transfer these to new situations.
  • Portfolio of evidence: - a carefully organised and complete collection of evidence compiled by candidates/learners to prove competence in relation to defined outcomes.
  • RPL - Recognition of Prior Learning means the comparison of the previous learning and experience of a learner against specified learning outcomes required for:
    - The award of credits for a specified unit standard or qualification,
    - Access to further learning,
    - Recognition in terms of meeting minimum requirements for a specific job,
    - Placement at a particular level in an organisation or institution, or
    - Advanced standing or status.
    This means that regardless of where, when or how a person obtained the required skills and knowledge, it could be recognised for credits. In this sense, RPL is an important principle of the NQF. RPL involves an assessment process of preparing for RPL, engaging with RPL candidates, gathering evidence, evaluating and judging evidence in relation to defined criteria, giving feedback and reporting results. Given that the all candidates are assessed against the same criteria, credits awarded through RPL are therefore just as valid as credits awarded through any other assessment process.
  • Outcomes-based assessment: - a planned process for gathering and judging evidence of competence, in relation to pre-determined criteria within an outcomes-based paradigm, for various purposes including further development and recognition of learning achievements.
  • Verifier: - those who operate at systems level to monitor assessment and moderation practices, trends and results.


    Principles of assessment:

    Methods of Assessment
  • Appropriate: The method of assessment is suited to the outcome being assessed i.e. is capable of gathering evidence in relation to the intended outcome, and not something else.
  • Fair: The method of assessment does not present any barriers to achievements, which are not related to the achievement of the outcome at hand.
  • Manageable: The methods used make for easily arranged, cost-effective assessments that do not unduly interfere with learning.
  • Integrated into work or learning: Evidence collection is integrated into the work or learning process where this is appropriate and feasible. (Often referred to as naturally occurring evidence).

    Evidence
  • Valid: The evidence focuses on the requirements laid down in the relevant standard and matches the evidence requirements of the outcome/s at hand under conditions that mirror the conditions of actual performance as closely as possible
  • Current: The evidence is sufficient proof that the candidate is able to perform the assessment outcomes at the time the assessor declares the candidate competent.
  • Authentic: The assessor is satisfied that the evidence is attributable to the person being assessed.
  • Sufficient: The evidence collected establishes that all criteria have been met and that performance to the required standard can be repeated consistently in the future i.e. the performance to standard is not a "once-off".

    Overall Assessment Process
  • Systematic: The overall process ensures assessment is fair, effective, repeatable and manageable.
  • Open: The process is transparent i.e. assessment candidates understand the assessment process and the criteria that apply and can contribute to the planning and accumulation of evidence.
  • Reliable/Consistent: The same assessor would make the same judgement again in similar circumstances and judgements match judgements made on similar evidence. 

  • QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Elective  58581   National Certificate: Air Traffic Support  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Reregistered  2023-06-30  TETA 
    Elective  59201   National Certificate: Generic Management  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Reregistered  2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50334   National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Reregistered  2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  79808   National Diploma: Occupational Safety  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Reregistered  2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50333   National Diploma: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Reregistered  2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  73529   Advanced Certificate: Education: School Management and Leadership  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Reregistered  2021-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50330   Bachelor: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices  Level 6  NQF Level 07  Reregistered  2021-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50331   National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Reregistered  2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  58579   National Diploma: Air Traffic Control  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Reregistered  2023-06-30  TETA 
    Elective  58008   National Diploma: Aircraft Piloting  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2016-12-31  TETA 
    Elective  61729   National Diploma: Policing  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Reregistered  2023-06-30  SAS SETA 
    Elective  20485   National First Degree: ABET Practice  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Reregistered  2021-06-30  ETDP SETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    1. A5 Competence Evolution 
    2. ABASUNGULI TRAINING SPESIALISTS (PTY) LTD 
    3. Abinet Training and Development 
    4. Academy for Continuous Professional Development 
    5. Academy of People Development Primary Co-operative Limited 
    6. Access Employment Skills & Development Agency 
    7. Accreditation & Training Services 
    8. Acquired Skills Training Consultancy t/a ASK Training Consultancy cc 
    9. Adelaine Training Solutions Pty Ltd 
    10. Advantage Training Services cc 
    11. Affari Consultants cc 
    12. AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (PTY)LTD 
    13. African Learning & Development Academy (Pty) Ltd (ALDA) 
    14. Aldabri 106 Institute for Quality Pty Ltd 
    15. Alona Institute of Leadership 
    16. Amandlolwazi Training Centre 
    17. Amaqamu Project Management and Consulting 
    18. Ambumed cc 
    19. Amyoli Consulting 
    20. Annacol Training Consultants 
    21. APPLIED MANAGEMENT STUDIES INTER-NATIONAL 
    22. AQUARIUS SKILLS SOLUTION 
    23. Aquila Summa Offensa Responsio Iugales Praestructio (ASORIP) (NPC) 
    24. Ariyan and Ariyan Learning Warehouse t/a Southern African Institute of Learning (SAIL) 
    25. Aspirations communication Training cc T/A Creative Minds Randburg 
    26. ASSESS AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE MPUMELELO 
    27. Assessment & RPL College (Pty) Ltd 
    28. Assessment and Entrepreneurship Centre 
    29. ASSESSMENT COLLEGE OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD 
    30. ATE Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    31. ATTE - The Training Edge 
    32. Attractive Softcare Application Projects cc t/a ASAP Events and Consulting 
    33. Aubrey Nyiko Business Enterprise cc 
    34. Audit Campus 
    35. AURECON TRAINING ACADEMY 
    36. BBM Qimba t/a BBM Qimba Consulting 
    37. Berry Rose Project Consultants & Service Providers 
    38. Berry-M Consulting and Projects 
    39. BIGBLU BUSINESS SERVICES 13 CC 
    40. Bogolo Ba Thuto Training Academy 
    41. Bohlali Provider Support 
    42. Boikgantsho Consulting & Events cc 
    43. Bonang Training & Development 
    44. Bondiswa Investments cc 
    45. BORDERGATE EVENTS MANAGEMENT AND PROJECTS 
    46. Boulton Providers 
    47. BP Developments 
    48. BPK Trading and Project 
    49. Brain Boosters Business Education (PTY) LTD 
    50. Braingro 
    51. Brainwave Projects 1997 CC 
    52. Breakeven 59(PTY) Ltd 
    53. Buchule HR & Events Management Services 
    54. Bull's Business and Skills Training Institute 
    55. Business Development Unit (PTY)Ltd 
    56. Business Intelligence Trading 48 (PTY) LTD 
    57. Cale Developments 
    58. Cedars Academy for Technical 
    59. Chartall Business College 
    60. Colleen Osorio Skills Development Consultancy cc 
    61. Compass Academy of Learning 
    62. Competency Alignment Forum (C.A.F) t/a Tlhatlogo Educational Services 
    63. Competitive Edge Training & Consulting 
    64. CONTEXTUAL ASSESSMENT INSTITUTE 
    65. Cool Ideas 1 (PTY) LTD. t/a VERYCOOLIDEAS 
    66. CORE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL 
    67. CUMAX 193 
    68. Curoplex (PTY) LTD 
    69. D and D Lwazi Renaissance Research and Development Institute 
    70. D M Management and Consulting 
    71. Dabulamanzi & Njabulo Ndaba Consulting cc 
    72. Datamatrix 
    73. Dava Development Consultants 
    74. Deon de Lange t/a TDC 
    75. Designa Qualifications Pty Ltd 
    76. Diligence Defined Projects PTY Ltd t/a Deligence Defined 
    77. DIPHETOGO GROUP PTY LTD 
    78. Directflo 
    79. Ditshiamiso Business Enterprise cc 
    80. Divine Inspiration Trading 704 PTY Ltd 
    81. Driving Instincts cc 
    82. DRM Skills Academy 
    83. Durban Institute of Skills Training cc 
    84. Dynamite Skills Development 
    85. Eagles Wings Skills Development Consultants 
    86. EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ASS INC 
    87. Education Connection Spacers NPC 
    88. EDUTEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD 
    89. Emanuel K Trading 
    90. Emtonjeni Wolwazi 
    91. Enjo Consultants 
    92. Enrico Training Academy 
    93. Environment and Language Education Trust 
    94. Equipt Training and Development cc 
    95. Eskilz College (Pty) Ltd 
    96. Esteem Solutions CC 
    97. ETS Emergency Training Solutions (PTY) LTD 
    98. Evening Flame Trading 
    99. EXECUTIVE COACHING AND FACILITATION 
    100. Falcon Business Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    101. Faranang Marketing 
    102. Femsa 
    103. Fine Touch Consulting cc 
    104. Fizazad Projects t/a Kajal and Associates 
    105. Friendly Ties Management 
    106. Full Circle Advisory Services (Pty) Ltd 
    107. Funda Africa Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    108. Fundukuzimela Investments (Pty) Ltd t/a FdZ Investments 
    109. Future Performance Training and Development 
    110. Future-Teacher (Pty) Ltd 
    111. G & K Gray Training cc 
    112. Gautech Training Institution 
    113. Gender Education & Development Institute (GEDI 
    114. Go Factory Training Academy 
    115. Gotsec Skills Training 
    116. Haggai Contractors 
    117. Halcyspace PTY LTD 
    118. Haras Blu Consulting 
    119. HDM PRODUCTIONS - HIGHVELD DIGITAL MULTI-MEDIA PRODUCTIONS CC 
    120. HDPSA 
    121. Headspace Consulting (PTY) Ltd 
    122. Hlengana Sibiya Training and Associates cc 
    123. Holofelang Business Enterprises cc 
    124. HRD Performance Consultants 
    125. HRD Training & Consulting 
    126. ICM t/a Institute for Career Management 
    127. Ifalezwe Learning Express 
    128. Igugu Training and Investments 
    129. Ikasa Consultancy Enterprise 
    130. Ikgodiseng Business Consulting 
    131. Ikhono Funda Training 
    132. Ikhowe Staffing Solutions cc 
    133. Imbalenhle Learning Academy 
    134. IMPI TRAINING (PTY)LTD 
    135. In Excess Trading 22 T/A ATTI Polokwane 
    136. IN TUITION 
    137. Inclusion support services 
    138. Independent Examination Board 
    139. Indlela Department of Labour 
    140. INHLANSI CONSULTANTS CC 
    141. Inkwazi Learning Network 
    142. INKWENKWEZI PRIVATE COLLEGE - SKILLS DEVELOPMENT cc 
    143. Institute for Local Government and Housing 
    144. Isamon Integrated 
    145. Isibani Skills Academy 
    146. Isibani Soluntu Development Trust 
    147. ITO Focus Buffalo City 
    148. ITO Focus East Rand cc 
    149. IYAM Investments (Pty) Ltd 
    150. J and N Ikwekwezi Yokusa Development Training 
    151. Jabulani Training & Development 
    152. Jaline Training & Consulting Services 
    153. Jenk Business Enterprise 
    154. JESUA CONSULTANTS (Hartenbos) (WA) 
    155. Josmap Training Institute 
    156. Jothavir Skilling t/a Eduskills Rainbow 
    157. Ka-Ntle Trading Enterprise 35 
    158. Kainav Conservation Global (Pty) Ltd 
    159. Kapoko Trading Enterprise 5 
    160. Karabo Info Centre and Trading 
    161. Katiso-kuno Consulting 
    162. KBB Training Academy 
    163. Keetileafrika Training Institute 
    164. Ken Mathews & AssociatesTraining Counsultants cc. 
    165. Kgaka Kgolo Institute 
    166. Kgang-Kgolo Consulting 
    167. Khaas Training Academy 
    168. KHETHIWE MANAGEMENT TRADING &MOTIVATION CONSULTANCY 
    169. Khoali Group of Companies (Pty) Ltd 
    170. KHULISANE ACADEMY 
    171. Kitso Bokamoso Training Solution 
    172. kitso Interventions 
    173. KITSO TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 
    174. Klein Karoo Resource Centre 
    175. Kwamfundo Training Services 
    176. KZN Tourism Training Centre 
    177. LABOUR GUIDE CC T OR A S A LABOUR GUIDE 
    178. Le Femme Consulting cc 
    179. Leadprotec 
    180. Learn Ability and Training Development t/a LearnAbility 
    181. Learnership Support Systems (Pty) Ltd 
    182. Learning Performance Link 
    183. Lembetsi Business Enterprise 
    184. Leronsa Trading Enterprise 
    185. Letlhabile Institute Of Management and Training 
    186. Life Long ABET Consulting 
    187. Life Projects 
    188. LONA ULWAZI CONSULTANTS CC 
    189. Lubusi Consulting: ETDTraining Provider 
    190. M P van Rooy Training Consultant 
    191. M3i Skills Development 
    192. Maccauvlei Learning Academy 
    193. MacMillan Teacher Campus 
    194. Majahd Educational Services Multi-Purpose Primary Co-operative Limited 
    195. Mako Centre for Health t/a Mako Institute 
    196. malandela Training and Development (PTY)LTD 
    197. Malemane PeopleDevelopment Services 
    198. Mapheto Business Enterprises t/a MBE 
    199. Marematlou Training Institute 
    200. Mary Hope Health Care 
    201. Masikhulisane Poeple Inc 
    202. Masimong Resource Solutions 
    203. Masinto Development & Logistics 
    204. Mathaveiya Skills Enhancement 
    205. Matimba Management and Labour cc 
    206. Matsume Learning Academy 
    207. Mawethu Training 
    208. MENTORNET (PTY) LTD 
    209. MGM Apparels cc 
    210. Mgwezane Training and Events Management CC. 
    211. MIET 
    212. Mine Safety Training Academy 
    213. Mondo Skills and services providers 
    214. Montshai Skills Development and Consultants 
    215. Mpho Skills cc 
    216. MPUMELELO CONSULTANCY CC 
    217. MPUMELELO TRAINING 
    218. Mthimkhulu Skills Development Services 
    219. Mtk Corporation Solutions 
    220. Multi Dimentional 
    221. Multilife (PTY) LTD 
    222. MVIMBI BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 
    223. MWG Logistical Services 
    224. My Training Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    225. Mzayifane Trading 6 
    226. Ndzalama Training 
    227. Nero Training Consultants cc 
    228. Netgrow Training Solutions 
    229. Networx for Career Development 
    230. Networx Training Foundation 
    231. New Age Strategies 
    232. Nixispan Trading 
    233. Nkinane Training Institute and Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    234. Nnika Consultancy 
    235. Noko-Mahabo Training and Development Solutions 
    236. Nomagwanishe Investments cc 
    237. NOMASOJABULA TRAINING CENTRE 
    238. Nompumelelo Institute of Leadership 
    239. Northshore Trading 19CC t/a Makakhaunye Training and Development Agency 
    240. Ntevho-Ketso Training and Recruitement Consultancy cc 
    241. Ntsangalala Business Enterprise 
    242. Nyelati Trading Enterprise 
    243. OBET PRO - Outcomes Based Education and Training Programmes 
    244. OD SDT CONSULTING 
    245. OMNI HR CONSULTING PTY LTD 
    246. Opehst Trading 
    247. Open Learning Group 
    248. Organisation Test 1 
    249. OUR RAINBOW CHILDREN MULTIPURPOSE INSTITUTE 
    250. Pachi Global Foundation 
    251. Pam's Educational Consultancy 
    252. Paradise Skills Development 
    253. PC Educational Holdings 
    254. PCS LEARNING SOLUTIONS 
    255. PEDRA BUSINESS ADMINISTRATORS cc 
    256. Peritum Agri Institute Pty LTD 
    257. Petra institute of Development (PTY) Ltd 
    258. Phangwana Consulting and Training Services 
    259. Pholo Human Capital 
    260. Phuka Holdings 
    261. Pineridge Training Centre 
    262. Pinetown Institute of Technology 
    263. Pitt Institute T/A Imithombo Institute 
    264. PMA Holdings (Pty) Ltd 
    265. PMADS Holdings (PTY) Ltd 
    266. PND Academy of Learning cc 
    267. Pono People Management Solutions 
    268. Poshido Training 
    269. Prestige ETD Group (Pty) Ltd 
    270. PRO-ACTIVE PUBLIC SERVICES COLLEGE/PTY/LTD 
    271. Prodev Education Quality Solutions 
    272. Prof. S. van de Merwe 
    273. Professional Development and Training Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    274. Proffecto Consulting 
    275. Project Literacy 
    276. Proserv International 
    277. Punchline Education And Training 
    278. QED-Quality Executive Development 
    279. Qingq'ume Training and Consulting cc 
    280. QPD CONSULTANTS 
    281. Qubelisa Enterprise Empowerment & Training 
    282. Realeboga Development Services 
    283. Regenesys Management (Pty) Ltd 
    284. Resonance Institue of Learning 
    285. RIO RIDGE 7 (PTY)LTD 
    286. ROWCO 95 
    287. S A Skills Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    288. SA Skills Development 
    289. Saint Colonel Graduate Institute (PTY) Ltd 
    290. Sales Partners Southern Africa 
    291. Sanchaa Connection 
    292. SANDF COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 
    293. SANTS College 
    294. Scan Training Solutions 
    295. Sciomax 
    296. Sebata Institute of Development 
    297. Sello's Computer 
    298. SEOPOSENGOE TRAINING CONSULTANCY CC 
    299. SEVENTH AVENUE TRAINING 
    300. Shelley Mcmaster cc 
    301. Sibesihle (Pty) Ltd 
    302. Sigodi Development Services and Associates (SDS) cc 
    303. Siletha Travels cc 
    304. Sirius Training 
    305. SIYAKHULA TRUST 
    306. Sizani Consulting cc 
    307. SKILLS DYNAMICS AFRICA PTY LTD 
    308. Skillsversity 
    309. SKU Training and Assessment 
    310. Sogwa Business Enterprise 
    311. Somerset Oaks Trading 21 
    312. Sourcecocoon Software 
    313. Southern African Institute of Productivity & Business Excellence 
    314. Sozim Trading and Consultancy 
    315. Sphola Consulting CC 
    316. SPS Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    317. STA Performance International 
    318. Starplex 489 cc 
    319. STC Skills Consortium/NASCO 
    320. Success Avenue Enterprises 
    321. SWAN SUPPORT SERVICES CC 
    322. Sync Business Consultancy (Pty) Ltd 
    323. T Mabuya & Associates (Pty) Ltd 
    324. Takatso Educare Training and Development Services 
    325. Targeted School Development Services 
    326. TEAM CONSULTANTS CC 
    327. Tembe Service Providers 
    328. Thabelanang t/a Thabelanang Trading Enterprise 
    329. Thalem Investments cc 
    330. Thasha Training and Consulting 
    331. The Brokers Learning Centre 
    332. The East London Institute for Leadership Advancement & Development 
    333. The Fundamentals Training Centre 
    334. THE GMC GROUP PTY LTD 
    335. The Institute of People Development 
    336. The Iscariota Group (Pty) Ltd 
    337. The Link Assessment Moderation and Skills Centre (PTY)Ltd 
    338. THE SKILLS COLLEGE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING(PTY) LTD 
    339. The Skills Depot 
    340. THE SKILLS FACTOR 
    341. The Skills Launchpad 
    342. The Supreme Training Academy 
    343. THINK TWICE 
    344. Third Wave Human Development Enterproses (Pty) Ltd 
    345. Thobologo Trading Enterprise 
    346. THRIVE LEARNING FACILITATION CC 
    347. THT Hospitality Training 
    348. Thuto Botshabelo Training Academy 
    349. Thuto Ya Setshaba Training Services (Pty) Ltd 
    350. Thuto-Ke Lefa Training cc 
    351. Tinissa Trading 29 PTY Ltd 
    352. TLHARIHANI TRAINING CENTRE (PTY) LTD 
    353. TLN HUMAN PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS (PTY) LTD 
    354. Tlotlangthuto Training and Consulting cc 
    355. TMG Quality Services 
    356. Tondanani Development Focus 
    357. Total Development Solutions 
    358. TPN Training and Recruitment cc 
    359. TR Training and Development cc 
    360. Train 2 Teach (PTY) Ltd 
    361. Training Answers 
    362. Training Unlimited Corporate Solutions 
    363. Trainyoucan 
    364. Tshepong Training Solutions 
    365. TSHIRELETSO COMMUNITY CARE CENTRE 
    366. Tshoki Trading 
    367. Tshwane South College for (ECD Academy) 
    368. Tufim Trading Enterprise CC 
    369. Tununu Trading cc 
    370. TURNSTONE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 
    371. Ubuhlebakhe Training and Development 
    372. Ulwazi Research & Training Centre 
    373. Ulwazi Training & Development 
    374. Umzansi Educational Programs Centre 
    375. Universal Knowledge Software 
    376. Vaiti Staffing and Training Solutions cc 
    377. VH Consulting 
    378. Vicami Trading and Projects t/a MV Coaching and Training Consultants 
    379. Vutivi Training and Skills Development 
    380. VUTLHARI BYA DZONGA CONSULTANTS 
    381. Whizz Skills Training and Development 
    382. Wildlife and Enviroment Society of South Africa 
    383. Winston Academy 
    384. Wonderkids Montessori Training Centre 
    385. WORK AND LEARNING DYNAMIX PTY LTD 
    386. World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd 
    387. Xcite Skills Development cc 
    388. zabathwa Training 
    389. Zamsiba Development Consultants 
    390. Zee Consulting 
    391. Zipgap Projects (PTY) LTD 



    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.