SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Apply Biblical models of reconciliation to estranged people and groups 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
115920  Apply Biblical models of reconciliation to estranged people and groups 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Christian Theology and Ministry 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies Religious and Ethical Foundations of Society 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 2  NQF Level 02 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 
2007-08-07  2010-08-07  SAQA 0160/05 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2011-08-07   2014-08-07  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
This Unit Standard will be useful to people who want to help people and communities to resolve conflicts.

Those credited with this Unit Standard are able to use Biblical models to help people to resolve conflicts and be reconciled. 

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
It is assumed that the learners are competent in Communication at NQF Level 1. 

UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
The following scope and context applies to the whole Unit Standard:
  • Case studies and simulated situations should be worked on by all learners;
  • Real situations of conflict could be deal with under the supervision of an experienced person.

    Specific range statements are provided in the body of the Unit Standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. 

  • Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Identify and describe possible causes of conflict in a community. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Causes of conflict include, but are not limited to: different views of morals, religion, politics, culture, witchcraft, crime, HIV/AIDS. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    A particular, real community is identified in order to contextualise community dynamics. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Particular causes of conflict are identified and described, drawing on personal knowledge and experience. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    At least three possible causes of conflict are described.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Areas of conflict are identified and possible causes are related to them. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Describe and explain people's reactions to the problems and the consequences of their actions. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Problems and consequences of actions are listed, drawing on personal experience. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Reactions to particular problems are accurately and impartially described with reference to blame, anger, sympathy, and other reactions. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The consequences of reactions discussed, drawing on personal and general experience. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Alienation, reconciliation, etc. should be included.
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Describe Biblical models of reconciliation for the conflict situation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Possible Biblical interventions in a conflict situation are described, using particular examples and general principles. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The Biblical basis of these interventions is explained and justified using appropriate Biblical examples and references. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Examples should be drawn from both Old Testament and New Testament and from a variety of situations.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Biblical examples of reconciliation are given by citing personalities such as Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Apply Biblical models of reconciliation for conflict situations. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Biblical principles of reconciliation are listed based on the actions or reactions of personalities cited in the Bible. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Should include confession, remorse, penance, etc.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The Biblical principles are appropriately applied in hypothetical situations. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Hypothetical situations (case studies or role plays), or actual conflict situations may be addressed if supervised by an experienced person.
     


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
    Providers of learning towards this Unit Standard will need to meet the accreditation requirements of the relevant ETQA.

    The moderation requirements of the relevant ETQA must be met in order to award credit to learners for this Unit Standard. 

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The following essential embedded knowledge will be assessed through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the stipulated assessment criteria. Candidates are unlikely to achieve all the specific outcomes, to the standards described in the assessment criteria, without knowledge of the listed embedded knowledge. This means that for the most part, the possession or lack of the knowledge can be directly inferred from the quality of the candidate's performance. Where direct assessment of knowledge is required, assessment criteria have been included in the body of the Unit Standard.
  • Biblical models of conflict management
  • Basic conflict management theory
  • Appropriate interventions within different situations 

  • UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems: the analysis of conflict situations. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively with others and in teams: analysis could be done in groups and conflict situations dealt with will impact on group relationships also. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills: analysis of the conflict as well as interaction with conflict situations will require the ability to express oneself clearly and accurately. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Understand the world as a set of inter-related parts of a system: the ability to deal with conflict in the church can also be applied in homes and society. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Participate as responsible citizens: skills gained through this Unit Standard will contribute to develop citizens who can recognise and begin to deal with conflict situations. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    Definition of Terms:

    Terms have been clarified as far as possible through the use of range statements. 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Core  48891   National Certificate: Theology and Ministry  Level 2  NQF Level 02  Reregistered  2023-06-30  HW SETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 



    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.