All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Operate Professionally in a Fitness Environment |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
10211 | Operate Professionally in a Fitness Environment | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Sport | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2006-08-01 | 2008-11-26 | SAQA 0160/05 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2009-11-26 | 2012-11-26 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
258724 | Operate professionally in a sport, recreation or fitness environment | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 3 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner achieving this unit standard in combination with context expertise standards, will be able to familiarize themselves with and conduct themselves professionally within the fitness workplace through a knowledge and understanding of the origins, scope of practice, stakeholders and future developments of the fitness industry |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
A learner aspiring to complete this unit standard must have been assessed competent against the following unit standards:
Communication NQF level 4, Literacy NQF level 4 and Numeracy NQF level 2 |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain the concept of fitness and its role in society |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Career opportunities in fitness are explained and types of work demonstrated Current trends in fitness programming and employment are outlined and examples given. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Members of a multi disciplinary team are listed 2. Referrals are demonstrated and lists drawn up of at least five examples 3. Legal and ethical practices are explained along with professional codes of conduct 4. Professional appearance, dress code and professional behaviour is displayed Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Fitness employee responsibilities are explained and adapted according to needs of the fitness environment 5. A Fitness facility's purpose, structure and function is explained and given context to the sports, recreation and fitness industry |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Discuss the fitness industry in both a national and international context |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Career opportunities in fitness are explained and types of work demonstrated Current trends in fitness programming and employment are outlined and examples given. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Members of a multi disciplinary team are listed 2. Referrals are demonstrated and lists drawn up of at least five examples 3. Legal and ethical practices are explained along with professional codes of conduct 4. Professional appearance, dress code and professional behaviour is displayed Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Fitness employee responsibilities are explained and adapted according to needs of the fitness environment 5. A Fitness facility's purpose, structure and function is explained and given context to the sports, recreation and fitness industry |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Give details on fitness as a career and be able to make informed career choices |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Career opportunities in fitness are explained and types of work demonstrated Current trends in fitness programming and employment are outlined and examples given. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Members of a multi disciplinary team are listed 2. Referrals are demonstrated and lists drawn up of at least five examples 3. Legal and ethical practices are explained along with professional codes of conduct 4. Professional appearance, dress code and professional behaviour is displayed Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Fitness employee responsibilities are explained and adapted according to needs of the fitness environment 5. A Fitness facility's purpose, structure and function is explained and given context to the sports, recreation and fitness industry |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Explain the concept of the health related multi disciplinary team. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Explain the concept of the health related multi disciplinary team, the role of each of its members and be able to refer appropriately |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Career opportunities in fitness are explained and types of work demonstrated Current trends in fitness programming and employment are outlined and examples given. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Members of a multi disciplinary team are listed 2. Referrals are demonstrated and lists drawn up of at least five examples 3. Legal and ethical practices are explained along with professional codes of conduct 4. Professional appearance, dress code and professional behaviour is displayed Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Fitness employee responsibilities are explained and adapted according to needs of the fitness environment 5. A Fitness facility's purpose, structure and function is explained and given context to the sports, recreation and fitness industry |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Describe the purpose, structure and operations of a fitness facility |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Career opportunities in fitness are explained and types of work demonstrated Current trends in fitness programming and employment are outlined and examples given. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Members of a multi disciplinary team are listed 2. Referrals are demonstrated and lists drawn up of at least five examples 3. Legal and ethical practices are explained along with professional codes of conduct 4. Professional appearance, dress code and professional behaviour is displayed Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Fitness employee responsibilities are explained and adapted according to needs of the fitness environment 5. A Fitness facility's purpose, structure and function is explained and given context to the sports, recreation and fitness industry |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Comply with legal and ethical business practices. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Career opportunities in fitness are explained and types of work demonstrated Current trends in fitness programming and employment are outlined and examples given. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Members of a multi disciplinary team are listed 2. Referrals are demonstrated and lists drawn up of at least five examples 3. Legal and ethical practices are explained along with professional codes of conduct 4. Professional appearance, dress code and professional behaviour is displayed Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Fitness employee responsibilities are explained and adapted according to needs of the fitness environment 5. A Fitness facility's purpose, structure and function is explained and given context to the sports, recreation and fitness industry |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge and understanding of:
1. The history and sociology of fitness industry 2. Fitness as a concept and how it plays a role in disease prevention and health promotion 3. The different types of health and performance related fitness 4. Careers in fitness and current trends in fitness programming and employment 5. Referrals, working with a team of health and fitness colleagues 6. The various professionals in health and fitness and what they do 7. Fitness facilities, their history, function in the community 8. Legal and ethical practices in fitness 9. Codes of conduct in fitness |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Professional development relates to:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment `events`. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 258724, which is "Operate professionally in a sport, recreation or fitness environment", Level 5, 3 credits.
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of: 1. Respecting the natural and cultural environment. 2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, For example: differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67693 | National Certificate: Fitness | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Core | 67691 | National Diploma: Fitness | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |