All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Conduct a screening procedure |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
10215 | Conduct a screening procedure | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Recreation & Fitness | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Learners credited with this Unit Standard are able to interact with a participant using an established screening tool in order to recommend physical activity or to clear for participation in an activity/s. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
A learner aspiring to complete this unit standard must have been assessed competent against the following unit standards:
Communication NQF level 4, Literacy NQF level 4 and Numeracy NQF level 2. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Collect data in a client sensitive manner. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Collect data in a client sensitive manner
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: 1. Data is accurately recorded 2. Data is stored systematically 3. Necessary data sheets, questionnaires, forms, log books are sourced for the screening procedure 4. Confidentiality and integrity of data is maintained 5. Explains purpose and function of questionnaire 6. Data is accurately interpreted according to accepted protocol for the particular screening tool 7. The screening protocol is understood together with the issues and implications that make up the screening tool (e.g. smoking, elevated cholesterol) 8. Results are accurately communicated to the fitness participant and/or referring practitioner 9. Protocol/s are explained to the participant. 10. Displays listening skills, non-judgmental, culturally sensitive and supportive behaviour. 11. Creates conducive environment for the screening process. 12. Participant is consulted with in reaching conclusions, which relate to physical activity readiness. 13. Participant is guided towards goals appropriate to physical activity readiness. 14. Areas of performance which are evaluated are open to improvement 15. Keeps track of own learning and performance and evaluates it against this unit standard and own expectations Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Appropriate decisions are made about exercise/sport readiness for the participant. 2. Appropriate referrals are made where necessary. 3. Goals/objectives are set relative to the needs and aims of participant Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Reflect on screening procedure and modifies protocol if necessary 5. Modifies delivery of the screening procedure in a culturally sensitive manner. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback.
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: 1. Data is accurately recorded 2. Data is stored systematically 3. Necessary data sheets, questionnaires, forms, log books are sourced for the screening procedure 4. Confidentiality and integrity of data is maintained 5. Explains purpose and function of questionnaire 6. Data is accurately interpreted according to accepted protocol for the particular screening tool 7. The screening protocol is understood together with the issues and implications that make up the screening tool (e.g. smoking, elevated cholesterol) 8. Results are accurately communicated to the fitness participant and/or referring practitioner 9. Protocol/s are explained to the participant. 10. Displays listening skills, non-judgmental, culturally sensitive and supportive behaviour. 11. Creates conducive environment for the screening process. 12. Participant is consulted with in reaching conclusions, which relate to physical activity readiness. 13. Participant is guided towards goals appropriate to physical activity readiness. 14. Areas of performance which are evaluated are open to improvement 15. Keeps track of own learning and performance and evaluates it against this unit standard and own expectations Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Appropriate decisions are made about exercise/sport readiness for the participant. 2. Appropriate referrals are made where necessary. 3. Goals/objectives are set relative to the needs and aims of participant Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Reflect on screening procedure and modifies protocol if necessary 5. Modifies delivery of the screening procedure in a culturally sensitive manner. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: 1. Data is accurately recorded 2. Data is stored systematically 3. Necessary data sheets, questionnaires, forms, log books are sourced for the screening procedure 4. Confidentiality and integrity of data is maintained 5. Explains purpose and function of questionnaire 6. Data is accurately interpreted according to accepted protocol for the particular screening tool 7. The screening protocol is understood together with the issues and implications that make up the screening tool (e.g. smoking, elevated cholesterol) 8. Results are accurately communicated to the fitness participant and/or referring practitioner 9. Protocol/s are explained to the participant. 10. Displays listening skills, non-judgmental, culturally sensitive and supportive behaviour. 11. Creates conducive environment for the screening process. 12. Participant is consulted with in reaching conclusions, which relate to physical activity readiness. 13. Participant is guided towards goals appropriate to physical activity readiness. 14. Areas of performance which are evaluated are open to improvement 15. Keeps track of own learning and performance and evaluates it against this unit standard and own expectations Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Appropriate decisions are made about exercise/sport readiness for the participant. 2. Appropriate referrals are made where necessary. 3. Goals/objectives are set relative to the needs and aims of participant Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Reflect on screening procedure and modifies protocol if necessary 5. Modifies delivery of the screening procedure in a culturally sensitive manner. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant.
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: 1. Data is accurately recorded 2. Data is stored systematically 3. Necessary data sheets, questionnaires, forms, log books are sourced for the screening procedure 4. Confidentiality and integrity of data is maintained 5. Explains purpose and function of questionnaire 6. Data is accurately interpreted according to accepted protocol for the particular screening tool 7. The screening protocol is understood together with the issues and implications that make up the screening tool (e.g. smoking, elevated cholesterol) 8. Results are accurately communicated to the fitness participant and/or referring practitioner 9. Protocol/s are explained to the participant. 10. Displays listening skills, non-judgmental, culturally sensitive and supportive behaviour. 11. Creates conducive environment for the screening process. 12. Participant is consulted with in reaching conclusions, which relate to physical activity readiness. 13. Participant is guided towards goals appropriate to physical activity readiness. 14. Areas of performance which are evaluated are open to improvement 15. Keeps track of own learning and performance and evaluates it against this unit standard and own expectations Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Appropriate decisions are made about exercise/sport readiness for the participant. 2. Appropriate referrals are made where necessary. 3. Goals/objectives are set relative to the needs and aims of participant Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Reflect on screening procedure and modifies protocol if necessary 5. Modifies delivery of the screening procedure in a culturally sensitive manner. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge and understanding of:
|
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork relates to:
Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Professional development relates to:
Collect data in a client sensitive manner For example: Interpret data in order to make decisions for participation or for physical activity readiness and provide relevant feedback. For example: Assist the participant in making informed decisions in setting goals For example: Manage data in order to provide continuity of support to the participant. For example: |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of:
1. Respecting the natural and cultural environment. 2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, For example: differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. NOTES (3): SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Knowledge of the ACSM guideline for risk stratification and for facility grading is important for this Unit Standard and would form part of the assessment criteria. This same risk stratification forms part of the criteria for the National certificate in Fitness. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67693 | National Certificate: Fitness | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Core | 67692 | National Diploma: Coaching Science | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Core | 67691 | National Diploma: Fitness | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 60309 | National Certificate: Sport Management | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CATHSSETA |
Elective | 73209 | National Diploma: Club Professional Golfing | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CATHSSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Exercise and wellness Trading Enterprise |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |