SAQA

All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.

SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE:

Plan advocacy campaigns and workshops in development practice

SAQA US ID	UNIT STANDARD TITLE
110063	Plan advocacy campaigns and workshops in development practice
ORIGINATOR
SGB Development
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-
FIELD			SUBFIELD
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development			Adult Learning
ABET BAND	UNIT STANDARD TYPE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	CREDITS
Undefined	Regular	Level 5	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5	8
REGISTRATION STATUS		REGISTRATION START DATE	REGISTRATION END DATE	SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"		2018-07-01	2023-06-30	SAQA 06120/18
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT		LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30		2027-06-30

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard.

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD

A learner accredited with this unit standard will be able to write up facilitation plans for workshops and advocacy programmes and monitor the implementation of those plans.

The learner will also be able to evaluate and review facilitation plans and integrate findings in future workshops and advocacy programmes.

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING

A learner studying towards this unit standard are assumed to have completed a Further Education Training Certificate in Development Practice at level 4 and unit standards 13, 15, and 16 at level 5.

UNIT STANDARD RANGE

Most of the range information is included under the assessment criteria and only those mentioned here are those that apply to all unit standards.

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1

Outline facilitation plans for workshops and advocacy programmes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. An issue that is relevant to the local community is identified.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. Clear outlines for workshops and advocacy programmes are presented.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Steps to involve relevant stakeholders are included in the outlay of the plans.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2

Consult all relevant stakeholders to engage facilitation plans for workshops & advocacy programmes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. Community stakeholders are invited to a public gathering using different means of communication.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. The plans are presented to stakeholders to solicit opinions.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Concerns of different stakeholders are recorded for incorporation into the revised plans.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3

Write facilitation plans for workshops and advocacy programmes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. Implementation plans for learning facilitation are written.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. Reasons for selecting particular strategies and methods are provided.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4

Monitor the implementation of facilitation plans for workshops and advocacy programmes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. Implementation of the facilitation plans is observed while being carried out by a co-worker and strengths and weaknesses are noted.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. Co-workers are monitored on the usage of a suitable language, tone, level and sensitivity.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Co-workers are monitored on how they manage the issue of ethics and diversity in different communities.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

4. Reports on the performance of co-workers are produced.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5

Evaluate and review facilitation plans for workshops and advocacy programmes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

1. Facilitation plans are evaluated following a prescribed procedure that illustrates weaknesses and strengths in the plans.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

2. Explanations are provided for what was wrong in the plans (where applicable).

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

3. Evaluations are recorded and lessons are indicated from the review.

UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS

Accredited providers may establish or refine moderation procedures and systems in line with the requirements of the relevant ETQA.

An external moderator may moderate the results of learners. External moderators should provide reports not only on the fairness and consistency of assessment, but also on the validity of the assessment design in terms of the specified outcomes.

UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE

A development practitioner shall gain knowledge and understanding of:

A broad range of training strategies, facilitation skills and methods

Relevant knowledge of all stakeholders

Organisational development theory, mobilisation and organising skills

The specialised knowledge required around the issue involved in the programme

UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME

N/A

UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES

N/A

Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO):

UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING

Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made:

When planning advocacy campaigns and workshops, numerous problems will be encountered and a learner will gain insight into identifying and solving problems responsibly.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING

Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community:

Planning advocacy campaigns and workshops usually involves many participants from different stakeholders. A learner will learn to work effectively with others.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING

Organising and managing oneself and one`s activities responsibly and effectively:

All the Specific Outcomes of this unit standard are about organising and managing oneself when planning. This unit standard addresses this critical cross-field outcome.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING

Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion:

When planning advocacy campaigns and workshops, numerous stakeholders are contacted through different means. A learner will thus have to communicate effectively with others.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE

Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others:

Campaigns and workshops are more effectively when a learner shows responsibility to the environment and the health of others. The unit standards addresses this critical cross-field outcome.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING

Demonstrating and understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation:

Campaigns and workshops often need to emphasize powerful messages, especially around issues that cannot be considered in isolation of the rest of society. This Unit Standard addresses the critical cross-field outcome.

Being culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts:

When planning advocacy campaigns and workshops, special attention must be given to the cultural diversity of participants and others. This Unit Standard addresses this critical cross-field outcome directly.

UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA

Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard could be employed as a development practitioner in the same provider institution with at least a level 6 Qualification and work with a registered assessor in development practice with the relevant ETQA.

Registered Assessors must have a level 6 qualification in development practice and prior or concurrent experience as a development practitioner.

REREGISTRATION HISTORY

As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015.

UNIT STANDARD NOTES

N/A

QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD:

	ID	QUALIFICATION TITLE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	STATUS	END DATE	PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
Core	23095	Higher Education and Training Certificate: Development Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	ETDP SETA
Core	49277	National Diploma: Braille Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	ETDP SETA
Core	49710	National Diploma: Development Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	ETDP SETA
Elective	61349	National Certificate: Heritage Resource Management	Level 5	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	CATHSSETA
Elective	59429	National Certificate: Inclusive Education	Level 5	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	ETDP SETA
Elective	58978	National Certificate: Journalism	Level 5	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	MICTS
Elective	80047	National Certificate: Road Safety Development	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	SAS SETA
Elective	58802	National Diploma: Disability Employment Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2020-07-30	SABPP
Elective	49598	National Diploma: Paralegal Practice	Level 5	NQF Level 05	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	SAS SETA

PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD:

This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.

1.	ATTI (Advanced Technonogy Training Institute)
2.	ATTI Nelspruit Pty Ltd
3.	B T Group of Companies Pty Ltd
4.	Dabulamanzi & Njabulo Ndaba Consulting cc
5.	Education and Training Unit
6.	Frayintermedia Cc
7.	Heirs Training and Development
8.	HILLCROSS BUSINESS SCHOOL (PTY
9.	HOPE ACADEMIC AND SKILL CENTRE
10.	Isibani Skills Academy
11.	Jabulani Training & Development
12.	Jeppe College of Commerce and
13.	Kenako Investments
14.	Kundani Trading
15.	M3i Skills Development
16.	Marematlou Training Institute
17.	MBOWA COLLEGE PTY LTD
18.	MENTORNET (PTY) LTD
19.	Musengavhadzimu Media
20.	Ntevho-Ketso Training and Recruitement Consultancy cc
21.	NTI College
22.	PMA Holding (Pty) Ltd
23.	Posh Multimedia
24.	Pretoria Technical College
25.	Professional Development and Training Institute (Pty) Ltd
26.	Rand Training College
27.	Retshetse Training Project
28.	Sigodi Development Services and Associates (SDS) cc
29.	Southern African Youth Movement
30.	Spotru Training Centre
31.	SPS Consulting (Pty) Ltd
32.	Thabelanang t/a Thabelanang Trading Enterprise
33.	The Fundamentals Training Centre
34.	THE GMC GROUP PTY LTD
35.	Thembekile training consulting
36.	Thuto-Botshabelo Training and Projects (Pty) Ltd
37.	TMG Quality Services
38.	Together Lifestyle Resort Pty Ltd
39.	TSP COLLEGE
40.	Ulwazi Training & Development
41.	Varsity Institute of Science & Technology (Pty)Ltd
42.	Vicresco (Pty) Ltd
43.	VUTHLARI MARKETING CONSULTING
44.	Whitestone College
45.	Wildfire Development Training Agency