All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Programming of electronic security systems/equipment |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
11135 | Programming of electronic security systems/equipment | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Security | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 20 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2005-11-01 | 2007-08-16 | SAQA 0160/05 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2008-08-16 | 2011-08-16 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
244336 | Configure an installation | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 7 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is for persons to successfully program electronic security equipment/system.
Benefit for society of this unit standard is that the person who completes this will contribute to safety in society. A person credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners wishing to attempt this unit standard have technical literacy, numeracy and communication skills equivalent to NQF level 4.
Competency in the following unit standards: The following knowledge, skills attitude and/or equivalent: |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Prepare for programming. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Client must include:
Company requirements must be found in: Manufacturers' specifications must be found in: Work order will be written, and must include: Tools and equipment must include: Electronic security equipment must include: Electronic security system must include: Possible risks and hazards must include: Training must include: Monitoring and response procedures to be determined and clarified must include: Customisation of equipment/system must include: Information/documentation provided to client must include: Results of commissioning documentation must include: Departments must include: Safe operating procedures must include: Personal protective equipment must include: Legislative considerations for testing commissioning security equipment/system must include: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The Learner has explained the layout of the programming worksheet and identified how the system will react after programming. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Demonstrate a clear understanding of the manufacturer specifications on programming. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Tools and equipment required to program are obtained and checked to ensure safe and efficient operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Complete the programming worksheet. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. The correct programming medium has been selected to effectively program the system and devices. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. A clear understanding of the installation layout is demonstrated. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Correctly default an installed security system and devices. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Client must include:
Company requirements must be found in: Manufacturers' specifications must be found in: Work order will be written, and must include: Tools and equipment must include: Electronic security equipment must include: Electronic security system must include: Possible risks and hazards must include: Training must include: Monitoring and response procedures to be determined and clarified must include: Customisation of equipment/system must include: Information/documentation provided to client must include: Results of commissioning documentation must include: Departments must include: Safe operating procedures must include: Personal protective equipment must include: Legislative considerations for testing commissioning security equipment/system must include: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Demonstrate a clear understanding of the process of defaulting a system or device. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Equipment/system performance, functions and limitations are understood. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Demonstrate competency in the different methods of defaulting a system. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Successfully default a system or device considering the stability of the system/device. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Default the system, considering the safety of self and others. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Perform programming. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Client must include:
Company requirements must be found in: Manufacturers' specifications must be found in: Work order will be written, and must include: Tools and equipment must include: Electronic security equipment must include: Electronic security system must include: Possible risks and hazards must include: Training must include: Monitoring and response procedures to be determined and clarified must include: Customisation of equipment/system must include: Information/documentation provided to client must include: Results of commissioning documentation must include: Departments must include: Safe operating procedures must include: Personal protective equipment must include: Legislative considerations for testing commissioning security equipment/system must include: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Demonstrate a clear understanding of the different programming languages. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Perform programming as per the programming work sheet and verify the accuracy of the programming by reviewing the programming. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Demonstrate a clear understanding of how the system and devices must react prior to and after programming. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Successfully program a system/device in such a manner that the system/device reacts and perform as per manufacturer specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Ensure that the system/device performs/reacts according to the client's expectations after programming has been completed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Conduct Administration. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Client must include:
Company requirements must be found in: Manufacturers' specifications must be found in: Work order will be written, and must include: Tools and equipment must include: Electronic security equipment must include: Electronic security system must include: Possible risks and hazards must include: Training must include: Monitoring and response procedures to be determined and clarified must include: Customisation of equipment/system must include: Information/documentation provided to client must include: Results of commissioning documentation must include: Departments must include: Safe operating procedures must include: Personal protective equipment must include: Legislative considerations for testing commissioning security equipment/system must include: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Ensure that the programming work sheet is comprehensively completed and that all relevant programming details are available for future reference. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Where required, ensure that reference numbers of successful communications with a remote monitoring station has been obtained and entered onto the programming worksheet and job cards. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Client confirmation of programming is obtained where required. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Indemnity is included to protect interest of all parties where required. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
1. Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with POSLEC SETA ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider through POSLEC SETA ETQA. 3. Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed POSLEC SETA ETQA procedures. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems when training client to use system, ensuring all possible uncertainties and difficulties are efficiently dealt with. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and ones activities by ensuring prompt and timeous handing over of system. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information when reviewing work order, ensuring all commissioning requirements have been fulfilled prior to handover. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively with client when explaining operating of the system, ensuring proper handover and safe usage afterward. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively by demonstrating practically to the client all operations and functions of system. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 244336, which is "Configure an installation", Level 4, 7 credits.
Supplementary Information: Assessment Statement Assessment is the process of collecting evidence and making judgments on the extent and nature of progress towards the achievement of the performance standard outlined in this unit. Assessment against this unit of competency may involve any of the following techniques: Guidance of assessment Evidence of competency is best obtained by observing activities in the field and in the office and reviewing fault finding in security equipment/system under normal industry operating conditions. If this is not practicable, observations in realistic simulated environments may be substituted. Evidence of competency will include: Resources required for Assessment |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 22110 | National Certificate: Electronic Security Practices | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2007-08-16 | Was SAS SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 23593 | National Certificate: Security Management: Electronic Security | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2007-08-16 | Was SAS SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ADT SECURITY SERVICES PTY LTD |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |