All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Plan a sanitation project |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
115953 | Plan a sanitation project | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Water Sector | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction | Civil Engineering Construction | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner achieving this unit standard in combination with context expertise standard(s) will be able to plan an integrated sanitation improvement project (not a programme). This will enable the learner to develop an implementation plan for a sanitation improvement project including a reporting framework in accordance with current best practice, taking into account policy and legislation. This will contribute towards effective sanitation project planning. Achieving this unit standard will enhance the employability of the learner in both the water sector and other industry related jobs. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Learners who meet the requirements of this unit standard should be able to develop a comprehensive and systematic sanitation improvement plan at project level according to current best practice. This plan should, inter alia, reflect integrated- and development-oriented principles and should incorporate a health and hygiene promotion and education component, which addresses locally identified needs. The range of technology options should include all the major ones encountered in South Africa as well as less common types including proprietary systems and ecological systems. They should be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of such systems and be able to assess where and under what conditions each would be most appropriate. However, knowledge of more detailed engineering principles is not required.
Role players in the sanitation project environment could include municipal representatives and officials, government department representatives, funders, project manager, project team members, community members, householders, project steering committee, ward committee, municipal officials and representatives, project employees, sub-contractors and other providers of goods and services. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify the types of sanitation improvement interventions needed in a given settlement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Local representatives are assisted in identifying local sanitation related problems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Geo-technical and social data (including health indicators) are gathered. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Broad infrastructural intervention options are identified based on local conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Local, specific non-infrastructural interventions to improve sanitation and hygiene practices are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Desired project outcomes are ratified with relevant people. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Identify different sanitation technical options and include most viable and sustainable ones. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Identify different sanitation technical options and include the most viable and sustainable ones for the situation in the planning process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Participatory processes are implemented as required in accordance with current best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Different sanitation technical options including design and materials, operating requirements and ecological considerations are identified and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Capital costs and operating cost implications are explained, compared and the most viable option is chosen based on local conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The household operation and maintenance responsibility for each technical option is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The institutional operation and maintenance responsibility for each technical option is explained, where relevant. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
At least three different types or designs of toilets are provided for in the plan. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Develop a sanitation project implementation plan in accordance with current best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The Water Services Development Plan, District Sanitation Strategy, and Area Business Plan are taken into account in the Sanitation Project Plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Requirements for intersectoral co-ordination are incorporated into the plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Key information requirements for a project-based sanitation improvement plan are incorporated into the plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A health and hygiene promotion and user education programme is incorporated into the sanitation improvement plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Key outputs of the project are identified and incorporated into the plan and the monitoring system. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The integration and sequencing of all processes are incorporated into the plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
All relevant costings and schedules are identified and incorporated into the plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
Consultation and decision-making procedures are followed and identified decision-making role-players are included in the planning process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
Project plan appraisal and approval procedures are described and followed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Develop a reporting framework for the sanitation project in accordance with current best practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Outputs, performance benchmarks and performance indicators are identified for each project activity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The information requirements of each role player are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Reporting procedures are documented in agreed format. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Accountability and project co-ordination and reporting mechanisms relevant to all role-players are identified. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made.
Assessment criteria: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community.
Assessment criteria: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Plan, organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively.
Specific outcome |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information.
Specific outcome |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the form of oral and/or written presentation.
Assessment criteria: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others.
Assessment criteria: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
Assessment criteria: |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Integrated Assessment
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the unit standards being assessed. Assessors must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge by developing assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which the learners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together in an integrated way, thus reducing the overall number of assessments and ensuring that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 48908 | National Certificate: Sanitation Project Co-ordination | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | EWSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ERGO MAPHELONG INSTITUTE (PTY) LTD |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |