All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Integrate sustainable breeding and selection methods |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116385 | Integrate sustainable breeding and selection methods | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Primary Agriculture | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Primary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The learner achieving this unit standard will be able to understand and apply advanced breeding and selection practices and integrate these practices into a breeding management programme.
Learners will gain specific knowledge and skills in the animal production field, specifically in the area of breeding management and will be able to operate in an animal production environment implementing sustainable and economically viable production principles. They will be capacitated to gain access to the mainstream agricultural sector, in animal production, impacting directly on the sustainability of the sub-sector. The improvement in production technology will also have a direct impact on the improvement of agricultural productivity of the sector. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will show competence against the following unit standards or equivalent:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Whilst range statements have been defined generically to include as wide a set of alternatives as possible, all range statements should be interpreted within the specific context of application.
Range statements are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Integrate advanced breeding practices into a breeding management programme. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Farm animals may include but are not limited to cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry, game, fish and other as relevant to the context of application. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An understanding of genetic principles relating to farm animals and their relationship to breeding practices is depicted. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The incorporation of genetic principles of farm animals into a breeding management programme is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Applicability of mating methods is recognised and the ability to integrate into a mating management programme is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Applicability and integration of artificial breeding techniques into a mating management programme is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Artificial insemination, embryo transfer, genetic manipulation, oestrus synchronisation and other. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Combine advanced selection methods into a breeding management programme. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Farm animals may include but are not limited to cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry, game, fish and other as relevant to the context of application. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An understanding of genetic principles relating to selection methods of farm animals and their relationship to breeding management programmes is incorporated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Applicability and integration of advanced selection methods into a mating management programme, is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Functional efficiency, performance testing, BLUP, progeny testing, variation and other. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Advantages and disadvantages of advanced selection methods are compared. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Incorporate the use of fertility and pregnancy diagnosis into a breeding management programme. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Farm animals may include but are not limited to cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry, game, fish and other as relevant to the context of application. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The applicability and benefits of fertility and pregnancy testing in farm animals is evaluated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The integration of fertility and pregnancy testing into a breeding management programme is depicted. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The evaluation of the results of fertility and pregnancy testing is classified and the decision between acceptable alternatives is demonstrated. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Develop and manage a sustainable breeding management programme. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Farm animals may include but are not limited to cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry, game, fish and other as relevant to the context of application. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Sustainable breeding and selection methods must be evaluated and integrated into a breeding management system. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Breeding techniques, systems, methods, selection and other. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
An integrated sustainable breeding programme must be developed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The implementation and management of a sustainable breeding programme should be evaluated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The sustainable breeding programme is analysed and revised on an annual basis. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which the qualifying learners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment, formative and summative assessment, portfolios and observations etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes; critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral or written evidence and cannot be assessed only by being observed. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, then they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The person is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem Solving: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-Organisation and Management: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Interpreting Information: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use Technology and Science: Relates to outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of Systems: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Professional Development: Relates to all outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49011 | National Diploma: Animal Production | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Elective | 63249 | National Diploma: Agricultural Extension | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Sibizi and Lekhela Agric Business Trading (Pty) Ltd |
2. | Suidwes Beleggings Eiendoms Beperk |
3. | The Skills Development Hub (Pty) Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |