All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of the capabilities of Geo-Information Systems |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116831 | Demonstrate an understanding of the capabilities of Geo-Information Systems | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Geographical Information Sciences | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction | Physical Planning, Design and Management | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 7 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will be useful to learners who wish to have a basic level of Geo Information literacy. This standard will be an entry-level education for someone entering the GIS field.
Learners credited with this unit standard are able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Describe the potential capabilities of Geo Information Systems. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Potential capabilities includes query indicate, locate, map, visualize, data warehousing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Geo-information systems Indicate-queries capability to identify the Attributes of a feature are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Geo-information systems feature location capability are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Geo-information systems map production capability are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Geo-systems capabilities to create different representations of the same data by changing the spatial attributes are and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Spatial attributes includes but not limited to : colours, width, size, font, symbology, switching layers on and off etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Geo-information system used as a data warehouse are explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Describe the Potential Capabilities of Spatial Analysis. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Potential capabilities includes deriving new data by using existing data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Geo-information systems and their thematic representation capability are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Boolean queries combining attribute and spatial data are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Map Algebra concepts are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Map Algebra includes but not limited to assigning numerical values to pixels and using the numerical values in mathematical operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Spatial relationships and how they are used are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Spatial relationships includes but are not limited to intersection, proximity, adjacency, containment, buffering. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe the limitations and risks associated with geo- information systems and data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Data set combinations on different scales and the effect thereof with each other explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The effect includes but not limited to generalization, geographic displacement, and mismatched data sets. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Spatial data sets on an inappropriate scale and the effect thereof are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Data currency and the effect on decision-making are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Meta data and the importance there off are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Data completeness and the effect on decision-making are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Data accuracy and the effect on decision-making are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Thematic representations using nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio and the effect thereof are explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Describe the costs associated with the use of geo information spatial analysis and systems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The relationship between the various cost factors are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Cost factors include but not limited to people, software, hardware and data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The importance and impact of the evolution of all the related components are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Components includes but are not limited to operating systems, application software, workstations, servers, storage capacity, network configuration, backup devices and acquired base data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A Geo Information Implementation plan is compiled and incorporates all relevant cost components. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Costs components includes but are not limited to training, support, consumables, sourcing existing data, maintaining data, software ,hardware, capturing own data, upgrading of hardware and software, customisation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The cost comparison between sourcing existing data and sourcing your own data are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Commercially off the Shelf application packages, the generic nature thereof, and the customisation needs involved to meet business requirements are explained. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Moderation options
|
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Essential embedded knowledge will be assessed through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the stipulated assessment criteria. Candidates are unlikely to achieve all the specific outcomes, to the standards described in the assessment criteria, without knowledge of the listed embedded knowledge. This means that for the most part, the possession or lack of the knowledge can be directly inferred from the quality of the candidate's performance. Where direct assessment of knowledge is required, assessment criteria have been included in the body of the unit standard. This is a generic statement.
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team/ group/ organisation or community:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematics and language skills in the modes of oral and written presentations:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically (showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others).
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Display an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors should keep the following principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49063 | National Certificate: Geographical Information Sciences | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CETA |
Core | 58784 | National Diploma: Geospatial Image Analysis | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2020-07-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |