All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Respond to a request for proposal |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
119176 | Respond to a request for proposal | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Generic Management | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Generic Management | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular-Fundamental | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard is able to demonstrate an understanding of assisting in writing up, and presenting proposals within the context of a sales environment and a specific organisation
The qualifying learner is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners accessing this unit standard will have demonstrated competence in
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Determine the capacity of the organisation to respond to the request for proposal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An analysis of the requirements as set out in the request for proposal is conducted and summarised in writing |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The major deliverables of the request for proposal are documented in a report |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The capacity of an organization to achieve the required deliverables is assessed, providing an indication of the degree of compliance |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
An outline is provided of resource capacity required to achieve the deliverables as set out in the request for proposal |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Determine major competitive advantage in responding to the request for proposal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A determination of the relevance of the request for proposal is drafted in the context of a specific organisation |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Reasons are outlined for the likelihood of a successful response to an request for proposal |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Major areas of competitive advantage and disadvantages are documented in a presentation |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Gather and collate data and information required to respond to the request for proposal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Research, appropriate to the specified requirements, is conducted and presented in required format |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Interdepartmental contributions to the execution of the proposed solution are quantified in writing |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Partners in the execution of the proposed solution are identified for the specific contribution they would make and recorded in required format |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Draft the response for a proposal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The template for response, as provided by the organization issuing the request for proposal, is obtained and analysed and recorded in the required format |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A model proposal is developed according to organisational requirements |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Authorisation for the model proposal is obtained from responsible individual |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Test the proposed response to an request for proposal among a peer group. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The proposed response to the request for proposal is presented to a peer group in the required format |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Input received from the peer group is tabulated and analysed in written form |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A plan is developed in a document to implement relevant input |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The proposed response is modified and circulated to the peer group for comment in the require format |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work in teams and groups to ensure that the response to the request for proposal represents the collective input of the organisation |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Critically collect, evaluate and analyse information when researching the request for proposal in the context of the organisation |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively when conveying research findings and also presenting the proposed response to stakeholders |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use Information Technology equipment and systems when compiling and presenting information regarding the request for proposal and the organisation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Adopt a systemic approach to the company when analysing its ability to meet the requirements of the request for proposal |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49419 | National Diploma: Business Consulting Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SERVICES |
Elective | 58394 | National Certificate: Film and Television Production | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MICTS |
Elective | 58977 | National Certificate: Publishing | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2015-06-30 | FPMSETA |
Elective | 63589 | National Diploma: Geographical Information Science | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CETA |
Elective | 63689 | Bachelor of Arts: Geographical Information Science | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-06-30 |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | BLC Entertainment |
2. | Epitome Villa (Pty)Ltd |
3. | EYETHU NATIONAL COMPUTER COLLEGE PTY LTD |
4. | FILM Mentorship & Training SA |
5. | Frayintermedia Cc |
6. | MBOWA COLLEGE PTY LTD |
7. | Media Village Training |
8. | OL Afrika Media |
9. | OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT |
10. | Peo Entle HIV Wellness Management and Youth Skills Development NPO |
11. | PRX SCHOOL TEST |
12. | Richfield Graduate Institute of Technology Pty Ltd |
13. | SOUTH AFRICAN CORPORATE TRAINING ASSOCIATION (PTY) LTD |
14. | VUTHLARI MARKETING CONSULTING |
15. | ZA WIT (PTY) LTD |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |