All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of prevention programmes in Victim Empowerment |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
120076 | Demonstrate an understanding of prevention programmes in Victim Empowerment | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Victim Empowerment | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | People/Human-Centred Development | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner will gain an understanding of the value and impact of prevention programmes in Victim Empowerment. The learners will gain knowledge and skills to develop culturally appropriate prevention programmes and strategies for various categories of victims.
Learners accredited with this Unit Standard will be capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner will be competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
> Primary prevention - approaches that aim to prevent violence before it occurs. > Secondary prevention - approaches that focus on the more immediate responses to violence, such as pre-hospital care, emergency services or treatment for sexually transmitted diseases following a rape. > Tertiary prevention - approaches that focus on long-term care in the wake of violence, such as rehabilitation and reintegration, and attempts to lessen trauma or reduce the long-term disability associated with violence. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Define prevention in the context of Victim Empowerment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Primary, secondary and tertiary prevention is defined and the differences outlined in accordance with relevant organisational services. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
These three levels of prevention are defined by their temporal aspect - whether prevention takes place before violence occurs, immediately afterwards or over the longer term. Although traditionally they are applied to victims of violence and within health care settings, secondary and tertiary prevention efforts have also been regarded as having relevance to the perpetrators of violence, and applied in judicial settings in response to violence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Public health interventions are traditionally characterized in terms of three levels of prevention:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Culturally appropriate social crime prevention in the South African context is defined and explained in relation to the multi-disciplinary and inter-sectoral approach employed in the sector. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Preventative and reactive interventions are distinguished by referring to appropriate examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The public health approach to violence prevention is explained in accordance with national and international sources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Sources include, but is not limited to: World Report on Violence and Health, National Crime Prevention Strategy, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Tools and mechanisms for systematic monitoring and evaluation of prevention programmes are described with examples. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Describe prevention strategies for child and youth violence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The distinction between child and youth victimisation is explained and clarified in relation to child and youth perpetrators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Types of risk behaviours and key risk factors for child and youth violence are identified and briefly described in accordance with national and international sources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Different strategies in preventing child and youth violence are explained with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Strategies include, but is not limited to: World Health Report on Violence which outlines individual approaches like anger management, family support approaches like family preservation services, training in effective parenting, community based approaches like community policing, societal approaches like poverty alleviation, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Prevention programmes for children and youth at risk are identified and described with relevant examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Programmes include, but is not limited to: programmes for youth both in and out of schools, gender, socialisation, healthy relationships, conflict resolution, anger management, sexuality, community education and awareness, youth at risk, perpetrators, and other life skills, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The rationale and philosophy of working with perpetrators of child and youth violence is explained in accordance with appropriate National and international instruments. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Relevant legislation and conditions governing referrals to programmes for perpetrators of child and youth violence is identified in accordance with relevant National and international instruments. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Legislative provisions include, but is not limited to: World Report on Violence and Health, Child Justice Bill, Sexual Offences Bill, etc. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe prevention of child and youth victimisation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Risk factors for child and youth abuse and neglect are explained with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Prevention strategies for child and youth abuse and neglect are identified and explained with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Current legislative provisions in addressing child and youth abuse and neglect are discussed with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The effectiveness of current prevention programmes for child abuse and neglect are discussed in order to improve service delivery. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the prevention of gender violence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The risk factors for gender violence are discussed using examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Risk factors include, but is not limited to: World Health Organisation report on Violence and Health refers to individual factors like history of violence and witnessing or experiencing violence as a child, relationship factors like dominance in the family, community factors like lack of employment and weak community sanctions against perpetrators, societal factors like societal norms supportive of male superiority and sexual entitlement, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The impact of gender violence on society is explained using relevant examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Impact includes, but is not limited to: economic impact, lost productivity, health impact, impact on children, emotional and behavioural problems, child prostitution, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Programmes to address gender violence are identified and described using relevant examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Programmes includes, but is not limited to: addressing gender stereotypes, socialisation and fostering healthy relationships, alternatives to violence e.g. conflict resolution and anger management, community education and awareness, programmes for youth at risk and perpetrators, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The rationale and philosophy of working with perpetrators of gender violence are explained in accordance with appropriate national and international instruments. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Current legislative provisions and conditions governing referrals to programmes for perpetrators of gender violence are discussed in accordance with relevant national and international instruments. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Describe environmental design and planning as a local crime prevention strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The concept of local crime prevention through environmental design is defined according to the National Crime Prevention Strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Crime and victimisation trends and patterns in the local community are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The key role-players in crime prevention in local communities are identified and their specific roles highlighted according to the sector. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Role-players include, but is not limited to: South African Police Services, Local authorities, School Governing Bodies, Community Policing Forums, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The limitations of local crime prevention strategies are identified according to relevant National and international sources. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems associated with prevention programmes in Victim Empowerment using responsible decision-making and creative thinking. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community on a daily basis to effectively provide prevention programmes in Victim Empowerment. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively to cope with the stress, burnout and vicarious trauma of providing Victim Empowerment prevention programmes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using appropriate modes of oral and/or written persuasion with all role-players in a multidisciplinary and inter-sectoral approach to the delivery of prevention programmes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world, as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving in presenting prevention programmes in Victim Empowerment exists in a variety of contexts. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors must be registered as assessors with a relevant ETQA, or an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the relevant ETQA. |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49872 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Victim Empowerment Co-ordination | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | HW SETA |
Elective | 67509 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Community Development | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 49836 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Gender Practice | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | HW SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |