All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Diagnose and repair faults on tooling during the production run |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
13331 | Diagnose and repair faults on tooling during the production run | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 24 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of engineering machining. This unit standard applies to the fault diagnosis and repair of tools, jigs, dies and fixtures and plastic injection moulds. The learner must demonstrate competence in either of the two skills areas to receive credits for this standard.
The learning outcomes in this unit standard also contribute to the exit level outcomes required for the National Certificate in Engineering Machining (NQF level 4) and related qualifications. Qualifying learners can diagnose faults and repair tools, dies, jigs and fixtures or plastic injection moulds during a production run. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed as the start of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for the maintenance of tools, jigs, dies and fixtures.
The credits allocated to this unit standard assume that a learners has already learned to: |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope and level of this unit standard is determined by the ranges as indicated under the specific outcomes.
The learner should be able to work autonomously with minimal supervision |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Monitor the performance of tooling on the production run. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Recurrent tooling faults and their root causes identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Minor repairs on line performed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Documentation on major repair requirements completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Tooling requiring major repair dismantled and dispatched to workshop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Production time schedule maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Potential production and maintenance problems are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Perform minor repairs on line. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Minor repairs include punch replacement, resharpening trimming edge, polishing flanges, stoning and polishing draw beads and tooling |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Recurrent tooling faults and their root causes identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Minor repairs on line performed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Documentation on major repair requirements completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Tooling requiring major repair dismantled and dispatched to workshop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Production time schedule maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Potential production and maintenance problems are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Record required major tooling repairs. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Recurrent tooling faults and their root causes identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Minor repairs on line performed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Documentation on major repair requirements completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Tooling requiring major repair dismantled and dispatched to workshop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Production time schedule maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Potential production and maintenance problems are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Identify potential production and maintenance problems. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Recurrent tooling faults and their root causes identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Minor repairs on line performed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Documentation on major repair requirements completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Tooling requiring major repair dismantled and dispatched to workshop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Production time schedule maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Potential production and maintenance problems are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Work safely with due care for self, fellow workers, machines, equipment, materials and environment. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Safe working practices include the use of guards and appropriate personal protective equipment |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Recurrent tooling faults and their root causes identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Minor repairs on line performed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Documentation on major repair requirements completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Tooling requiring major repair dismantled and dispatched to workshop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Production time schedule maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Potential production and maintenance problems are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Minor repairs and maintenance are done accurately and timeously to avoid production problems and delays 2. Tooling identified for major repair removed with minimal disruption to production process Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assuror who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. The assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
The learner can be assessed in the language of his/her choice although s/he has to report incidents or conditions to someone else. The learner will be assessed on his/her ability to report in the language commonly used in his/her working environment. The learner will be assessed in the workplace but s/he can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. The learner can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names & functions of:
Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties: Purpose of: Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: Procedures and techniques Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards Theory: rules, principles, laws Relationships, systems: The relationship between optimum tooling functioning and the production process |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work together with others:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 23281 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Tooling Manufacture | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-10-22 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 66489 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Foundry Operations | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2013-11-07 | MERSETA |
Elective | 50040 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Optical Manufacturing Processes | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |