All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Identify and describe the anatomical & bio-mechanical differences unique to each special population |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
13921 | Identify and describe the anatomical & bio-mechanical differences unique to each special population | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Sport | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner achieving this unit standard in combination with context expertise standard(s) will be able to apply the anatomical and BM principles to special populations, this will give them the ability to analyze the bio-mechanical differences of each special population and adapt exercise programmes accordingly. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
A learner aspiring to complete this unit standard must have been assessed competent against the following unit standards:
Communication NQF level 4, Literacy NQF level 4 and numeracy NQF level 2, Apply anatomical and bio-mechanical principles to physical activity NQF level 5 |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Considers bio-mechanics with development of pregnancy and adapts exercise accordingly 2. Explains unique anatomical and bio-mechanical characteristics of each special population (e.g. explains how changes in gait occur in walking with ageing population) 3. Considers gender differences in planning an exercise programme for children Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Anatomical structures are explained and changes or adaptations for special populations (e.g. changes that occur in pregnancy with circulatory systems) 5. Considers range of movement of elderly participant and adapts exercises accordingly 6. Considers participant with physical disability and adapts exercise. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Considers bio-mechanics with development of pregnancy and adapts exercise accordingly 2. Explains unique anatomical and bio-mechanical characteristics of each special population (e.g. explains how changes in gait occur in walking with ageing population) 3. Considers gender differences in planning an exercise programme for children Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Anatomical structures are explained and changes or adaptations for special populations (e.g. changes that occur in pregnancy with circulatory systems) 5. Considers range of movement of elderly participant and adapts exercises accordingly 6. Considers participant with physical disability and adapts exercise. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Considers bio-mechanics with development of pregnancy and adapts exercise accordingly 2. Explains unique anatomical and bio-mechanical characteristics of each special population (e.g. explains how changes in gait occur in walking with ageing population) 3. Considers gender differences in planning an exercise programme for children Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Anatomical structures are explained and changes or adaptations for special populations (e.g. changes that occur in pregnancy with circulatory systems) 5. Considers range of movement of elderly participant and adapts exercises accordingly 6. Considers participant with physical disability and adapts exercise |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Considers bio-mechanics with development of pregnancy and adapts exercise accordingly 2. Explains unique anatomical and bio-mechanical characteristics of each special population (e.g. explains how changes in gait occur in walking with ageing population) 3. Considers gender differences in planning an exercise programme for children Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Anatomical structures are explained and changes or adaptations for special populations (e.g. changes that occur in pregnancy with circulatory systems) 5. Considers range of movement of elderly participant and adapts exercises accordingly 6. Considers participant with physical disability and adapts exercise. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities:
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Considers bio-mechanics with development of pregnancy and adapts exercise accordingly 2. Explains unique anatomical and bio-mechanical characteristics of each special population (e.g. explains how changes in gait occur in walking with ageing population) 3. Considers gender differences in planning an exercise programme for children Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Anatomical structures are explained and changes or adaptations for special populations (e.g. changes that occur in pregnancy with circulatory systems) 5. Considers range of movement of elderly participant and adapts exercises accordingly 6. Considers participant with physical disability and adapts exercise. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Considers bio-mechanics with development of pregnancy and adapts exercise accordingly 2. Explains unique anatomical and bio-mechanical characteristics of each special population (e.g. explains how changes in gait occur in walking with ageing population) 3. Considers gender differences in planning an exercise programme for children Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Anatomical structures are explained and changes or adaptations for special populations (e.g. changes that occur in pregnancy with circulatory systems) 5. Considers range of movement of elderly participant and adapts exercises accordingly 6. Considers participant with physical disability and adapts exercise. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge and understanding of the following in relation to special populations
1. Biomechanical factors and modifications for special populations 2. Anatomical structures and changes 3. Anatomical terminology 4. Systems e.g. circulatory, respiratory, nervous, endocrine and changes with growth, ageing, pregnancy 5. Physical laws influencing movement 6. Balance and alignment 7. Posture and muscle imbalance 8. Human movement terminology 9. Fundamental movements and function of different muscles in human movement 10. Normal range of motion in various anatomical structures. 11. Exercise and movement analysis |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment For example: Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Team work relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment For example: Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment For example: Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment For example: Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment For example: Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Professional development relates to:
Explain to fitness participants changes in anatomical structures and systems of the human body For example: Identify the unique characteristics in each special population with regard to interrelationships between centre of gravity, base of support, balance, stability and spinal alignment For example: Identify the unique anatomical and BM characteristics and considerations of each special population For example: Describe the unique structure and nature of movement in the body for each special population For example: Integrate gender differences relative to the ability to carry out specific activities: For example: Consideration is given to anatomical and biomechanical differences or changes with regard to disability For example: |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of:
1. Respecting the natural and cultural environment. 2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, For example: differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67691 | National Diploma: Fitness | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |