All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Advise special populations on nutritional requirements and ergogenic aids |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
13923 | Advise special populations on nutritional requirements and ergogenic aids | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Sport | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner achieving this unit standard in combination with context expertise standard(s) will be able to give educated advice on the unique nutritional requirements of each special population group, will also be able to inform participants on benefits and risks of ergogenic aids, working within their scope of practice. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
A learner aspiring to complete this unit standard must have been assessed competent against the following unit standards:
Communication NQF level 4, Literacy NQF level 4 and numeracy NQF level 2, Promote an awareness of nutritional principles NQF level 5 |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations |
OUTCOME NOTES |
1. Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Identifies unique nutritional requirements of various special populations and offers appropriate guidance 2. Informs of the risks and benefits associated with taking various health enhancing supplements and or ergogenic aids 3. Describes the nutritional value of health enhancing supplements Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Assesses general nutritional status of participant through accepted industry protocols 5. Offers guidance to participant on risks and benefits associated with supplementation 6. Refers to relevant dietary professional when and where necessary |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
2. Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits;
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Identifies unique nutritional requirements of various special populations and offers appropriate guidance 2. Informs of the risks and benefits associated with taking various health enhancing supplements and or ergogenic aids 3. Describes the nutritional value of health enhancing supplements Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Assesses general nutritional status of participant through accepted industry protocols 5. Offers guidance to participant on risks and benefits associated with supplementation 6. Refers to relevant dietary professional when and where necessary |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
3. Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome:
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Identifies unique nutritional requirements of various special populations and offers appropriate guidance 2. Informs of the risks and benefits associated with taking various health enhancing supplements and or ergogenic aids 3. Describes the nutritional value of health enhancing supplements Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Assesses general nutritional status of participant through accepted industry protocols 5. Offers guidance to participant on risks and benefits associated with supplementation 6. Refers to relevant dietary professional when and where necessary |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
4. Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product:
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Identifies unique nutritional requirements of various special populations and offers appropriate guidance 2. Informs of the risks and benefits associated with taking various health enhancing supplements and or ergogenic aids 3. Describes the nutritional value of health enhancing supplements Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Assesses general nutritional status of participant through accepted industry protocols 5. Offers guidance to participant on risks and benefits associated with supplementation 6. Refers to relevant dietary professional when and where necessary |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Assess general nutritional status of participants. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
5. Assess general nutritional status of participants
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure that the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Identifies unique nutritional requirements of various special populations and offers appropriate guidance 2. Informs of the risks and benefits associated with taking various health enhancing supplements and or ergogenic aids 3. Describes the nutritional value of health enhancing supplements Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 4. Assesses general nutritional status of participant through accepted industry protocols 5. Offers guidance to participant on risks and benefits associated with supplementation 6. Refers to relevant dietary professional when and where necessary |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge and understanding of:
1. Macro nutrients (protein, carbohydrates, fats) 2. Micro nutrients (vitamins, minerals 3. Hydration, fibre in the diet 4. Diet evaluation 5. Food label reading 6. Nutrition and the digestive system 7. Food intolerances and allergies 8. Anti nutrients 9. Nutrition for weight loss and weight gain 10. Glycaemic index 11. Metabolism 12. Common nutritional myths and misinformation 13. Dangerous and ineffective weight loss methods 14. Eating disorders and body image 15. Current dietary guidelines for physical activity and healthy living 16. Ergogenic aids and assimilation 17. Classes of ergogenic aids 18. Pharmaceutical application 19. Production processes 20. Referral and who the professionals are in the field of diet and nutrition. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to specific outcomes 1,2,5
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork relates to:
Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome: For example: Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product: For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to:
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to:
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome: For example: Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product: For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to:
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome: For example: Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product: For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to:
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome: For example: Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product: For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to:
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome: For example: Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product: For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Professional development relates to:
Identify the unique nutritional requirements of special populations For example: Inform participants on ergogenic aids, their purported mechanism of action and any risks and/or benefits; For example: Inform participants on nutritional factors relating to the female athlete tri-ad syndrome: For example: Describe the nutritional value of health enhancing supplementation and ergogenic products to assist in informed choice of product: For example: Assess general nutritional status of participants For example: |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of:
1. Respecting the natural and cultural environment. 2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, For example: differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. NOTES (3): SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION It is essential to note that fitness professionals must be able to work as part of a multi disciplinary team. In the case of this Unit Standard, those would include dieticians, nutritionists, naturopaths, pharmacologists, pharmacists, herbalists, homeopaths and any other practitioners working in the field of diet, supplementation and ergogenic aids. Fitness practitioners must also work within their scopes of practice in relation to diet and nutrition and ensure that appropriate referrals are made where necessary. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67691 | National Diploma: Fitness | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |