SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Present information in a public setting 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
13925  Present information in a public setting 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Sport 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 02 - Culture and Arts Sport 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 
2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2026-06-30   2029-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
Confidently conduct a presentation in various settings ranging from a corporate wellness program to a lecture, an informal discussion or a sports team. 

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
Communication equivalent to NQF 4. 

UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. 

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. 
OUTCOME NOTES 
1. Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

    METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

    Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
    Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
    Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
    Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
    Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party)

    Integrated assessment
    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

    Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed:

    Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
    1. Material is presented in an organized manner.
    2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience.
    3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives.
    4. Presents in a confident and professional manner.

    Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
    5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered.
    6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Prepare and organize presentation material. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    2. Prepare and organize presentation material.
    For Example:
  • Overheads. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

    METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

    Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
    Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
    Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
    Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
    Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party)

    Integrated assessment
    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

    Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed:

    Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
    1. Material is presented in an organized manner.
    2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience.
    3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives.
    4. Presents in a confident and professional manner.

    Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
    5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered.
    6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    3. Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

    METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

    Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
    Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
    Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
    Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
    Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party)

    Integrated assessment
    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

    Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed:

    Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
    1. Material is presented in an organized manner.
    2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience.
    3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives.
    4. Presents in a confident and professional manner.

    Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
    5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered.
    6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Display optimal presentation skills. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    4. Display optimal presentation skills.
    For Example:
  • Eye contact.
  • Body language.
  • Voice projection.
  • Dialogue. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

    METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

    Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
    Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
    Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
    Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
    Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party)

    Integrated assessment
    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

    Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed:

    Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
    1. Material is presented in an organized manner.
    2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience.
    3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives.
    4. Presents in a confident and professional manner.

    Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
    5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered.
    6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    5. Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Adjusting speech rate and volume and complexity of the content.
  • Observe the response from the audience and adjust if necessary.
  • Evaluate performance through the use of feedback tools. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

    METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

    Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
    Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
    Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
    Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
    Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party)

    Integrated assessment
    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

    Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed:

    Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
    1. Material is presented in an organized manner.
    2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience.
    3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives.
    4. Presents in a confident and professional manner.

    Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
    5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered.
    6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. 

  • SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 
    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    6. Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

    They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

    As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.

    The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

    METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
    Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

    A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

    Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
    Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
    Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
    Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
    Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party)

    Integrated assessment
    It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
  • Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
  • Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
  • Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

    Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed:

    Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
    1. Material is presented in an organized manner.
    2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience.
    3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives.
    4. Presents in a confident and professional manner.

    Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
    5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered.
    6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. 


  • UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
  • Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
  • Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQA policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation; in terms of agreements reached around assessment and moderation between ETQA (including professional bodies); and in terms of the moderation guideline detailed under point 4 immediately below.
  • Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies specify otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification.

    Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. 

  • UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    1. Operation of technical equipment.
    2. Appropriate software programs.
    3. Content knowledge specific to the presentation.
    4. Public speaking skills.
    5. Facilitation skills.
    6. Research skills referring to content, environment, audience.
    7. Ability to structure and adapt presentation according to the characteristics and needs of the audience.
    8. Cultural considerations.
    9. Self-organisation skills.
    10. Factors of and ways of overcoming fear of public speaking.
    11. Techniques to deal with own anxiety.
    12. Techniques to research the environment. 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Problem solving relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Adjusting speech rate and volume and complexity of the content.
  • Observe the response from the audience and adjust if necessary.
  • Evaluate performance through the use of feedback tools.

    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Teamwork relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures.

    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Self-organisation and management relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Prepare and organize presentation material.
    For Example:
  • Overheads.

    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures.. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Information evaluation relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Prepare and organize presentation material.
    For Example:
  • Overheads.

    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures.

    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communication relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Display optimal presentation skills.
    For Example:
  • Eye contact.
  • Body language.
  • Voice projection.
  • Dialogue.

    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE 
    Use of science and technology relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Inter-relatedness of systems relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Prepare and organize presentation material.
    For Example:
  • Overheads.

    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures.

    Display optimal presentation skills.
    For Example:
  • Eye contact.
  • Body language.
  • Voice projection.
  • Dialogue.

    Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Adjusting speech rate and volume and complexity of the content.
  • Observe the response from the audience and adjust if necessary.
  • Evaluate performance through the use of feedback tools.

    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Professional development relates to:

    Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
    For Example:
  • Decide on pertinent points for the presentation.
  • Content and logical flow.
  • Research group and group needs.

    Prepare and organize presentation material.
    For Example:
  • Overheads.

    Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
    For Example:
  • Organisation of presentation material.
  • Use of colours in the (power point) presentation.
  • Adapt presentation given environmental circumstances.
  • Contingency measures.

    Display optimal presentation skills.
    For Example:
  • Eye contact.
  • Body language.
  • Voice projection.
  • Dialogue.

    Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Adjusting speech rate and volume and complexity of the content.
  • Observe the response from the audience and adjust if necessary.
  • Evaluate performance through the use of feedback tools.

    Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
    For Example:
  • Entertainment.
  • Education.
  • Motivation.
  • Informing.
  • Awareness creation. 

  • REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of:

    1. Respecting the natural and cultural environment.
    2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, For example: differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Core  49107   National Certificate: Inspection and Enforcement Services  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  PSETA 
    Core  67691   National Diploma: Fitness  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Core  49055   National Certificate: Foreign Economic Representation  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  PSETA 
    Fundamental  13741   Diploma: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2003-10-11  Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Fundamental  64649   Higher Certificate: Early Childhood Development  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Fundamental  48872   National Certificate: Information Technology (Systems Development)  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  MICTS 
    Fundamental  22902   National Diploma: Environmental Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Fundamental  13742   Degree: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2003-10-11  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  48962   Further Education and Training Certificate: Manufacturing and Assembly Logistics (M&AL)  Level 4  NQF Level 04  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  MERSETA 
    Elective  97228   National Certificate: Paralegal Practice  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    1. ABASUNGULI TRAINING SPESIALISTS (PTY) LTD 
    2. Academy at Vaal Triangle (AVT 
    3. Africa Learn (Pty) Ltd 
    4. Amilak Training Center 
    5. Aubrey Nyiko Business Enterprise cc 
    6. Axolemahle Business Enterprise 
    7. Bakho Skills Development 
    8. Belgium Campus 1 
    9. Bells Technical College 
    10. BOLAND COLLEGE 
    11. Business Development Unit (PTY)Ltd 
    12. Capricorn College for FET 
    13. Careers IT 
    14. Caversham Education Institute 
    15. CENTRE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT 
    16. CHILI PEPPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 
    17. College of Cape Town - Athlone Campus 
    18. COLLINS SEBOLA FINANCIAL SERVICES (PTY) 
    19. Custoda Trust 
    20. D M Management and Consulting 
    21. Damelin 
    22. Damelin Correspondence College (Pty) Ltd 
    23. DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTRE NPC 
    24. Department Of Justice (head Office) 
    25. Digix Computers Services 
    26. Directflo 
    27. DM Training Consultants 
    28. Dru A Professional Further Education and Training College DAPFETC PT 
    29. Early Learning Foundation Montessori Teacher Training 
    30. Early Learning Resource Unit (ELRU) 
    31. EASTCAPE MIDLANDS COLLEGE BUSINESS UNIT (Uitenhage) (WA) 
    32. EBENEZER TRAINING HOUSE FOR EARLY LEARNING 
    33. Edu Experts SA 
    34. Edu-Prof Training Centre 
    35. EDUTAK PRE-SCHOOL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 
    36. EDUTEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD 
    37. Ekasi IT Solutions Centre 
    38. ELASON PRO-ACTIVE SECURITY (PTY) LTD 
    39. Enjo Consultants (Pty) Ltd 
    40. Facilitation Development (PTY) LTD 
    41. FALSE BAY TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING COLLEGE 
    42. Faranang Business and Training Solutions PTY(LTD) 
    43. Finweb Business Consultancy 
    44. FLAVIUS MAREKA FET COLLEGE 
    45. Foster-Melliar (Pty) Ltd 
    46. Gert Sibande Public FET College - Central Office 
    47. Global Institute for Capacity 
    48. Goldfields TVET College 
    49. Grassroots Adult Education and Training Trust 
    50. HILLCROSS BUSINESS SCHOOL (PTY 
    51. Hlanganani ICT (Pty) Ltd 
    52. Information Technology Resource Centre 
    53. INGWE FET COLLEGE 
    54. IT Academy 
    55. Jabulani Training & Development 
    56. Jeppe College of Commerce and 
    57. JUMPCO PTY LTD 
    58. K Boneng Consulting Services P 
    59. K2014266944 (SA) t/a Hyperion Development 
    60. Katiso-kuno Consulting 
    61. Kgaka Kgolo Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    62. KHANIMAMBA TRAINING AND RESOURCE CENTRE 
    63. Klein Karoo Resource Centre 
    64. Lehlabile Emergency Institute 
    65. LETAGO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING 
    66. Lionsden Africa Business Solutions Pty Ltd 
    67. Loago Business Consulting 
    68. Makhophila Training 
    69. Marematlou Training Institute 
    70. MAS SAFE SECURITY CC 
    71. Mash Computer Training 
    72. MASIKHULE EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE 
    73. MATHS CENTRE INCORPORATING SCIENCES 
    74. MBOWA COLLEGE PTY LTD 
    75. MENTORNET (PTY) LTD 
    76. Metanoia Ratings PTY LTD 
    77. MIDRAND TRAINING ACADEMY PTY LTD 
    78. Mogapi Education Group (Pty) Ltd 
    79. Montessori Teacher Training Centre South Africa 
    80. Moving Ahead Development Agenc 
    81. Mpande Technologies cc 
    82. Mufuka Business and Technical 
    83. MWG Logistical Services 
    84. N MAHARAJ ATTORNEYS 
    85. NCC - Vereeniging 
    86. Ndulita Solutions 
    87. New Beginnings Training and Development Organisation 
    88. Northern Cape Urban College: Kimberley Campus 
    89. Northlink College 
    90. Northshore Trading 19CC t/a Makakhaunye Training and Development Agency 
    91. Nyathela Business College 
    92. On the Ball College Pty ltd 
    93. OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT 
    94. Orbit FET College - Central Office 
    95. OXY TRADING 735 CC 
    96. Peritum Agri Institute Pty LTD 
    97. Petra institute of Development (PTY) Ltd 
    98. Pineridge Training Centre 
    99. PMA Holding (Pty) Ltd 
    100. PNJ TRAINING ACADEMY NPC 
    101. Port Elizabeth TVET College 
    102. Posh Multimedia 
    103. Priha Projects Pty Ltd 
    104. PROFESSIONAL CHILD CARE COLLEGE PTY LTD 
    105. Progressive School of Business 
    106. QUARPHIX (PTY) LTD 
    107. QUBELISA MTIYA SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY (PTY) LTD 
    108. RAMAZWI SECURITY SERVICES CC 
    109. Read Educational Trust 
    110. Redefine Human Capital (PTY) L 
    111. Reflections Development Institute 
    112. Retshetse Training Project 
    113. Richfield Graduate Institute of Technology Pty Ltd 
    114. Right 4 u College 
    115. Rostec Technical FET College (Pty) Ltd 
    116. SANTS College 
    117. SERITI INSTITUTE 
    118. Sisekelo Sustainability Institute 
    119. Siyahluma Education Institute 
    120. SIYANIVIKELA SECURITY SERVICES 
    121. SOUTH AFRICAN LAW SCHOOL 
    122. SOUTH AFRICAN LAW SCHOOL RANDBURG 
    123. South Cape Public FET College - George Campus 
    124. South West Gauteng Tvet College 
    125. SPLS Consultants (Pty) Ltd 
    126. SPS Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    127. Sunshine Community Outreach Ministry of Youth With A Mission 
    128. SUPREME ICT CONSULTANTS 
    129. Sustainability Institute Trust 
    130. T Mabuya & Associates (Pty) Ltd 
    131. TDM Management Consulting Pty Ltd 
    132. Tembe Service Providers 
    133. Thasha Training and Consulting 
    134. The College of Modern Montessori 
    135. The Finishing College (Pty) Lt 
    136. THE GMC GROUP PTY LTD 
    137. The Iscariota Group (Pty) Ltd 
    138. The Port Elizabeth Early Learning Centre 
    139. THUKAKGALADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 
    140. Titan Trade Technologies 
    141. TLHARIHANI TRAINING CENTRE (PTY) LTD 
    142. Tlou Foundation College 
    143. TORQUE TECHNICAL COMPUTER TRAINING PTY LTD 
    144. Train 2 Teach (PTY) Ltd 
    145. Trainers Without Borders 
    146. Tshwane South College for (ECD Academy) 
    147. TSP COLLEGE 
    148. Ubuntu Care and Development 
    149. Umgungundlovu FET College 
    150. Unathi Training 
    151. UNIVERSAL COLLEGE OUTCOMES SA 
    152. Varsity Institute of Science & Technology (Pty)Ltd 
    153. VERYCOOLIDEAS 
    154. VH Consulting 
    155. Vuselela TVET College 
    156. Waterberg TVET College 
    157. We Think Code 
    158. Wellinkwise Pty Ltd 
    159. WEST COAST COLLEGE FET 
    160. WESTERN COLLEGE FOR FURTHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING 
    161. Whitestone College 
    162. WonderKids Academy 
    163. Woosh Consultants (Pty) Ltd 
    164. World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd 
    165. World Wise Industries & Systems Engineering 
    166. Xylo Trading 12 (Pty) Ltd 
    167. Yellow Media Learning Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    168. YITRO INNOVATIONS 
    169. ZA WIT (PTY) LTD 



    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.