All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Evaluate sport performance |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
14470 | Evaluate sport performance | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Sport | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner achieving this unit standard in combination with context expertise standard(s) will be able to measure a variety of parameters of sport performance and interpret the results of common tests of skills and fitness.
In addition the learner will be well positioned to extend their learning and practice to other areas where data-based decisions about training and performance are needed, or to strive toward unit standards and practice at higher levels. Competent qualifying learners will be able to make recommendations about instruction and training based on the interpretation of data gathered using valid and reliable measurement strategies, thus supporting a scientific approach to training for intermediate and advanced level sport. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will show competence in communication and numeracy equivalent to NQF level 5. Learners also must have successfully completed the National Certificate in Coaching Science NQF level 5 as prerequisite learning. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in examples for each outcome. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must, however, be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to the scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Interpret the results of tests of skill(s) and fitness for a sport |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. A sport-specific performance evaluation plan is implemented with a group of performers. 2. Normative-based feedback is provided to a group of performers. 3. Technology and statistical treatment of data is used when appropriate to support performance evaluations. 4. Methods of evaluation are selected according to the needs of the performers and the purpose for evaluation in the training of the performers. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Test protocols are adjusted according to the specific needs of individuals and availability of technology for measurement. 6. The results of evaluation are used feedback on which to base changes in training programmes, coaching behaviours, etc. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Administer indirect tests of endurance, strength, flexibility, power and speed |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. A sport-specific performance evaluation plan is implemented with a group of performers. 2. Normative-based feedback is provided to a group of performers. 3. Technology and statistical treatment of data is used when appropriate to support performance evaluations. 4. Methods of evaluation are selected according to the needs of the performers and the purpose for evaluation in the training of the performers. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Test protocols are adjusted according to the specific needs of individuals and availability of technology for measurement. 6. The results of evaluation are used feedback on which to base changes in training programmes, coaching behaviours, etc. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Administer tests of skills (and tactics) in a sport |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. A sport-specific performance evaluation plan is implemented with a group of performers. 2. Normative-based feedback is provided to a group of performers. 3. Technology and statistical treatment of data is used when appropriate to support performance evaluations. 4. Methods of evaluation are selected according to the needs of the performers and the purpose for evaluation in the training of the performers. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Test protocols are adjusted according to the specific needs of individuals and availability of technology for measurement. 6. The results of evaluation are used feedback on which to base changes in training programmes, coaching behaviours, etc. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Processing data using basic statistics and formulate reports on test performance |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. A sport-specific performance evaluation plan is implemented with a group of performers. 2. Normative-based feedback is provided to a group of performers. 3. Technology and statistical treatment of data is used when appropriate to support performance evaluations. 4. Methods of evaluation are selected according to the needs of the performers and the purpose for evaluation in the training of the performers. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Test protocols are adjusted according to the specific needs of individuals and availability of technology for measurement. 6. The results of evaluation are used feedback on which to base changes in training programmes, coaching behaviours, etc. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Describe the various roles of measurement and evaluation in the improvement of sport performance |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Describe the various roles of measurement and evaluation in the improvement of sport performance at the intermediate and advanced levels.
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. A sport-specific performance evaluation plan is implemented with a group of performers. 2. Normative-based feedback is provided to a group of performers. 3. Technology and statistical treatment of data is used when appropriate to support performance evaluations. 4. Methods of evaluation are selected according to the needs of the performers and the purpose for evaluation in the training of the performers. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Test protocols are adjusted according to the specific needs of individuals and availability of technology for measurement. 6. The results of evaluation are used feedback on which to base changes in training programmes, coaching behaviours, etc. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. A sport-specific performance evaluation plan is implemented with a group of performers. 2. Normative-based feedback is provided to a group of performers. 3. Technology and statistical treatment of data is used when appropriate to support performance evaluations. 4. Methods of evaluation are selected according to the needs of the performers and the purpose for evaluation in the training of the performers. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Test protocols are adjusted according to the specific needs of individuals and availability of technology for measurement. 6. The results of evaluation are used feedback on which to base changes in training programmes, coaching behaviours, etc. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to specific outcomes:
Interpret the results of tests of skill(s) and fitness for a sport. Processing data using basic statistics and formulate reports on test performance Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to specific outcomes:
Administer indirect tests of endurance, strength, flexibility, power and speed Administer tests of skills (and tactics) in a sport. Processing data using basic statistics and formulate reports on test performance. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to specific outcomes:
Interpret the results of tests of skill(s) and fitness for a sport Processing data using basic statistics and formulate reports on test performance Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to specific outcome:
Interpret the results of tests of skill(s) and fitness for a sport |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to specific outcome:
Interpret the results of tests of skill(s) and fitness for a sport Administer indirect tests of endurance, strength, flexibility, power and speed Administer tests of skills (and tactics) in a sport Processing data using basic statistics and formulate reports on test performance Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to specific outcomes:
Interpret the results of tests of skill(s) and fitness for a sport Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Learner and societal development relates to specific outcome:
Use technology to support measurement and evaluation of performance |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
NOTES (1): ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: Measurement and evaluation of skills. Measurement and evaluation of physical fitness Basic statistics. Computer literacy. Technical knowledge of the fitness requirements of at least one sport. Technical knowledge of the skill and tactical requirements of at least one sport.. NOTES (2): VALUES Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of: 1. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude toward diversity. For example, Differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67692 | National Diploma: Coaching Science | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |