All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Address issues related to injuries and health in sport |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
14477 | Address issues related to injuries and health in sport | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Sport | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner achieving this unit standard in combination with context expertise standard(s) will be able to implement a sport development programme that is compatible with the goals of injury prevention and the long-term health of the performers, especially at the intermediate and advanced levels of expertise.
In addition the learner will be well-positioned to extend their learning and practice to other areas where and understanding of health issues can have a positive influence on the delivery of programmes, or to strive toward unit standards and practice at higher levels. Competent qualifying learners will be able to evaluate performance situations in terms of injury and health issues, as well as make recommendations for safer sport participation environments, and thus raise the general level of quality of life of sport performers in South Africa. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will show competence in communication and numeracy equivalent to NQF level 5. Learners also must have successfully completed the National Certificate in Coaching Science NQF level 5 as prerequisite learning. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in examples for each outcome. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must, however, be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to the scope and complexity of what is required |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Describe the aetiology and incidence of specific sport injuries |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Sport-specific strategies for preventing injuries are applied in training sessions and competitive events (including avoidance of over-use injuries). 2. Fitness and skill development programmes are specifically focused to maximise injury prevention. 3. The implications of chronic and traumatic injuries are discussed with performers. 4. Injured performers are dealt with in an ethical manner and data relating to injuries is maintained and used to evaluate programme safety. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Performer education programmes are presented according to the specific needs and safety/health challenges inherent in a particular sport. 6. Changes in safety policies and procedures are made based on data-based evaluation of current policies and procedures. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Analyse the anatomical and physiological factors underlying injuries in a selected sport |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Analyse the anatomical and physiological factors underlying injuries in a selected sport and discuss injury prevention techniques.
For example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Sport-specific strategies for preventing injuries are applied in training sessions and competitive events (including avoidance of over-use injuries). 2. Fitness and skill development programmes are specifically focused to maximise injury prevention. 3. The implications of chronic and traumatic injuries are discussed with performers. 4. Injured performers are dealt with in an ethical manner and data relating to injuries is maintained and used to evaluate programme safety. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Performer education programmes are presented according to the specific needs and safety/health challenges inherent in a particular sport. 6. Changes in safety policies and procedures are made based on data-based evaluation of current policies and procedures. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe the psychological impact of injury on sport performance |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Sport-specific strategies for preventing injuries are applied in training sessions and competitive events (including avoidance of over-use injuries). 2. Fitness and skill development programmes are specifically focused to maximise injury prevention. 3. The implications of chronic and traumatic injuries are discussed with performers. 4. Injured performers are dealt with in an ethical manner and data relating to injuries is maintained and used to evaluate programme safety. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Performer education programmes are presented according to the specific needs and safety/health challenges inherent in a particular sport. 6. Changes in safety policies and procedures are made based on data-based evaluation of current policies and procedures. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Establish ethical guidelines for promoting player health and safety. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Sport-specific strategies for preventing injuries are applied in training sessions and competitive events (including avoidance of over-use injuries). 2. Fitness and skill development programmes are specifically focused to maximise injury prevention. 3. The implications of chronic and traumatic injuries are discussed with performers. 4. Injured performers are dealt with in an ethical manner and data relating to injuries is maintained and used to evaluate programme safety. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Performer education programmes are presented according to the specific needs and safety/health challenges inherent in a particular sport. 6. Changes in safety policies and procedures are made based on data-based evaluation of current policies and procedures. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Identify the key health issues affecting sport performers |
OUTCOME NOTES |
For example:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools that are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Sport-specific strategies for preventing injuries are applied in training sessions and competitive events (including avoidance of over-use injuries). 2. Fitness and skill development programmes are specifically focused to maximise injury prevention. 3. The implications of chronic and traumatic injuries are discussed with performers. 4. Injured performers are dealt with in an ethical manner and data relating to injuries is maintained and used to evaluate programme safety. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. Performer education programmes are presented according to the specific needs and safety/health challenges inherent in a particular sport. 6. Changes in safety policies and procedures are made based on data-based evaluation of current policies and procedures. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people, e.g. report from a third party. Integrated Assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to specific outcomes:
Analyse the anatomical and physiological factors underlying injuries in a selected sport and discuss injury prevention techniques Establish ethical guidelines for promoting player health and safety |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to specific outcome:
Establish ethical guidelines for promoting player health and safety |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to specific outcomes:
Describe the aetiology and incidence of specific sport injuries Analyse the anatomical and physiological factors underlying injuries in a selected sport and discuss injury prevention techniques Describe the psychological impact of injury on sport performance Establish ethical guidelines for promoting player health and safety Identify the key health issues affecting sport performers |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to specific outcomes:
Describe the aetiology and incidence of specific sport injuries Describe the psychological impact of injury on sport performance |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to specific outcomes:
Describe the aetiology and incidence of specific sport injuries Identify the key health issues affecting sport performers |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to specific outcomes:
Describe the aetiology and incidence of specific sport injuries Analyse the anatomical and physiological factors underlying injuries in a selected sport and discuss injury prevention techniques Describe the psychological impact of injury on sport performance Establish ethical guidelines for promoting player health and safety Identify the key health issues affecting sport performers |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Learner and societal development relates to specific outcomes:
Describe the psychological impact of injury on sport performance Establish ethical guidelines for promoting player health and safety Identify the key health issues affecting sport performers |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
NOTES (1): ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: Anatomy and biomechanics of sport. Growth and development. Peridisation of training. Sport psychology. Sport nutrition. Technical knowledge of the fitness requirements of at least one sport. Technical knowledge of the skill and tactical requirements of at least one sport. First aid. Information management. NOTES (2): VALUES Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of: 1. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude toward diversity. For example, Differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67692 | National Diploma: Coaching Science | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |