All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Support the facilitation of development project service delivery in a Ward Committee context |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
242895 | Support the facilitation of development project service delivery in a Ward Committee context | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Public Administration and Management | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Public Administration | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is designed for learners working in a Ward Committee or Local Government structure, where the acquisition of competence against this standard will add value to their job. The standard will contribute to the aspirations of individuals seeking to develop a career pathway in Local Government and administration.
The qualifying learner is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the qualifying learner is competent in Communication at Level 1. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Define service excellence within a Local Government context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The service delivery objectives of Local Government are defined with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Problems in service delivery effectiveness are examined by utilising past case studies and examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The skills and talents that a Ward Committee member must integrate service delivery into Ward Committee functioning are defined with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Procedures for measuring and evaluating service efficacy are defined and integrated into Ward Committee service plans. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Utilise appropriate service tools in order to integrate Local Government service delivery for development project objectives into Ward Committee processes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Service objectives for Ward Committees are defined in relation to community needs and Local Government objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Roles and responsibilities in relation to service objectives are assigned to respective role players within Ward Committee. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Methods for engaging external role players in enhancing service delivery are identified and approached to assist in contributing towards service delivery objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Any issues and sensitivities that may hinder service plan are identified and solutions to overcome these are proposed in the context of the Ward Committee service delivery objectives. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Implement a basic service delivery plan in line with overall service delivery objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A service excellence plan is drawn up in conjunction with municipal representative. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A method for evaluating implementation of plan is discussed and measures are included in the plan to achieve this. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A basic improvement plan is included to ensure that service delivery objectives are continually revised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Appropriate resources to ensure success of plan are identified, sourced and managed according to Municipal processes and procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Evaluate service delivery effectiveness. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The evaluation tools outlined in the service plan are used to evaluate the effectiveness of service delivery within the Ward Committee context on an ongoing basis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Any problem areas are reported on to appropriate municipal representative and other Ward Committee members. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Resolutions to solve service delivery problems and integrate into a revised plan are discussed and implemented according to municipal procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Success areas are recorded and reported on to appropriate roleplayers. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking processes to effectively implement service delivery objectives within a Ward Committee context. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community to ensure that Ward Committee serviced delivery objectives are achieved. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively in order to contribute effectively to Ward Committee service delivery objectives. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information in order to evaluate effectiveness of service delivery plan. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion to expose key roleplayers and stakeholders to service delivery objectives. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility to the environment and health of others to communicate, monitor and record service delivery implementation objectives. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of interrelated systems by recognising that ward committee service delivery problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation and that a variety of roleplayers and factors will effect service delivery of Ward Committees. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Participate as responsible citizens in the life of local, national and global communities by ensuring that ward committee service delivery objectives fulfiil a wider community need whilst at the same time complying with municipal protocol and procedures. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 57823 | National Certificate: Ward Committee Governance | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | LG SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | A4 Consultancy CC |
2. | Amabamba Recruitment |
3. | Amandla Consulting Services |
4. | AVAX SA 481 CC. T/A Mandisa Development Services |
5. | Avenida (Pty) Ltd |
6. | Bonakude Consulting (Pty) LTD |
7. | Brilliant Affairs |
8. | Bull's Business and Skills Training Institute |
9. | Buyisiwe Management Services (Pty) Ltd |
10. | Dee's Training (PTY) LTD |
11. | DM Training Consultants |
12. | Edequette Training Institute |
13. | Edutraining Business College |
14. | Excellent Minds Institute (Pty) Ltd |
15. | Faranang Marketing |
16. | Fumani Ma-Afrika Group |
17. | Giamanje TVET College |
18. | Growth Management Consulting |
19. | ICM t/a Institute for Career Management |
20. | IQ Skills Academy (PTY) LTD. |
21. | Jabukile Consultancy |
22. | Jobafrik Consulting |
23. | Josmap Training Institute |
24. | Khantsha Projects NPC |
25. | Khehli Institute |
26. | Kwa Nxamalala Computer College |
27. | Lewerb Holdings (PTY) Ltd |
28. | Makhuba Development Projects CC |
29. | Mamuhle Academy |
30. | MANCOSA Pty (Ltd) |
31. | Mazasa Management Consulting CC. |
32. | Mcebo Technologies |
33. | Mdaka Omnyama Trading and Projects |
34. | Mintirho Development Services |
35. | Morar Incorporated - KZN |
36. | Mortarboard Training Solutions |
37. | MTK Corporate Solutions |
38. | Nemalale Eagles Consultancy CC |
39. | Neopeo Trading & Projects |
40. | Networx for Career Development |
41. | Ngidi Consulting (Pty) Ltd |
42. | Nkinane Trading Enterprise |
43. | NKQUBELA CONSULTING |
44. | Nokusho M Consulting and Trading |
45. | Pachedu Skills Solutions |
46. | Paramount Training Academy |
47. | Pebetse Training and Consulting |
48. | Petra Institute of Development |
49. | PFIM Trading (Pty) Ltd |
50. | PMA Holdings (PTY ) LTD. |
51. | Progressive School of Business and Engineering (Pty) |
52. | PTDEV (Pty) Ltd |
53. | Reflections Development Institute |
54. | Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd t/a Regent Business School |
55. | Ruthekho Training Academy |
56. | Sebenzisanane Human Capital |
57. | Silalele Consulting CC. |
58. | Siza Nesu Training and Consultants |
59. | Songimvelo Consultant and Training |
60. | South West Gauteng College - Central Office |
61. | T Mabuya & Associates CC |
62. | Tasc Business Consulting and Training |
63. | Thando Consulting Services |
64. | Thinking Mind Trading |
65. | Tloumogale Business Development & Consulting |
66. | Tshepang Consulting & Project |
67. | Tshwane Training Institute (PTY) LTD. |
68. | Umqondo Consultancy |
69. | UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS EXCELLENCE(PTY)LTD |
70. | University of Venda |
71. | Ursivox Interactive Systems |
72. | Vukauzakhe Traiding Enterprise |
73. | Washa 2 Training & Projects |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |