All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Assess the quality of peaches and nectarines for export |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
243886 | Assess the quality of peaches and nectarines for export | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Secondary Agriculture: Processing | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Secondary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 16 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in Mathematical Literacy and Communication at NQF Level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Outline the background and structure of the peach and nectarine export industry. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The origin of the various peach and nectarine varieties and the chief cultivars that have been produced from these are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The major peach and nectarine production areas in South Africa are identified and the main cultivars that are grown in each area are listed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The extent of the global peach and nectarine export industry, with regard to production levels and statistics are outlined and the countries that constitute South Africa's competition are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The various components of the peach and nectarine export chain are identified and the objectives of each are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The derivative products that are produced from peaches and nectarines are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The role players in the peach and nectarine export industry are listed and the function that they each perform is indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
A brief outline of the best practices for the cultivation, harvesting and post harvest treatment of peaches and nectarines are related and the ways in which the observance of these will enhance the achievement of export quality are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The positive contribution that ongoing research and development has on the viability and profitability of peach and nectarine exports is described and the focus areas where constant improvement is being sought, are identified. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the definitions and applications of the terminology used in the peach and nectarine export industry. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The reasons why all role players and participants in the peach and nectarine export industry should understand and use the specific terminology are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The definition and relevance of the general terminology that is used in the fruit export industry is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
General terminology includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The definition and application of the terminology that is used to describe and determine the quality of peaches and nectarines is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Specific peach terminology includes but is not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe the legislative and logistical requirements for the exportation of peaches and nectarines and the necessary processes to ensure compliance. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The requirements and processes include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The legislative requirements that must be met before an export inspection will be conducted, are indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Legislative requirements include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The logistics that have to be verified before an inspection may be conducted are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Logistics include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The various food safety standards that must be adhered to and the procedures to ensure compliance to these are indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The requirements for cartons, containers and pallets, that are intended to house/transport peaches and nectarines and the procedures for their inspection, as per the regulations and SOPs are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The necessity of providing the correct lighting and inspection environment for the quality determination of peaches and nectarines is explained and the facility requirements, as per SOPs are listed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The packing requirements for the exportation of peaches and nectarines, as per regulations and SOPs are indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The marking requirements that must be used on containers and consignments for the identification of export peaches and nectarines, as per the regulations are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The industry processes and documentation that are utilised in the exportation of peaches and nectarines, according to the relevant SOP's, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Processes and documentation include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The necessity and benefits of establishing and implementing a quality management system for peach and nectarine exportation are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Necessity and benefits include but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Select a representative sample of peaches or nectarines for inspection. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The sampling range includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The aims and objectives of sampling and the importance of obtaining a representative sample from a peach or nectarine consignment are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The principles of sampling and the reasons why these must be stringently applied when peach or nectarine pear sampling is conducted are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Principles include but are not limited to:
Random, predictable, selective, position. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The function and benefits of conducting a line observation before a peach or nectarine sampling commences are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Function and benefits include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The peach and nectarine sampling methodology and the criteria for examination of a consignment as per regulations or the company's SOPs are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The sampling size or percentage of a peach or nectarine consignment that must be drawn for inspection, as per the regulations or the company's SOPs are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The methods of drawing a representative sample of peaches or nectarines from a consignment are demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The reasons why a MRL sample must be drawn from a peach or nectarine consignment are explained and the procedures for conducting the sampling are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The importance of identifying and including possible deviating specimens when conducting sampling is explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Determine the external quality of peaches and nectarines for compliance to export standards. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The external quality considerations include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The general appearance and shape of the various peach and nectarine cultivars, as per the standards, are indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The methods to determine the ripeness of peaches and nectarines, as per the standards are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The importance of comparing and verifying the overall colouration of the peach and nectarines to the appropriate colour charts for each cultivar is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The degree of uniformity of size and colouration that the various peach and nectarine cultivars have to conform to, as per the standards are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The methods to determine the diameter and overall dimensions of export quality peaches and nectarines, as per the standards are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The various malformations that preclude peaches and nectarines from export acceptance are indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The effect that hail marks have on the acceptability of peaches and nectarines for export and the tolerances that are allowed, are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The various external abnormalities and the tolerances that are acceptable for the evaluation of a peach or nectarine consignment are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Abnormalities include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The unspecified factors/non conformities on the fruit that render the peaches and nectarines unsuitable for export are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 10 |
The instruments that are used to examine the peaches and nectarines for compliance to the standards are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Instruments include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 11 |
The reasons why a consignment that contains foreign plant material may be rejected are explaine |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 12 |
Examples of special market requirements, that are in addition to the standards, are explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Determine the internal quality of peaches and nectarines for compliance to export standards. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The internal quality considerations include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The methods for the testing the maturity/ripeness of the various peach and nectarine cultivars are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The procedures for the conducting of a pressure test on peaches and nectarines are demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The procedures to ascertain whether the peaches or nectarines have split or broken stones are demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The various internal defects that preclude the acceptance of a consignment of peaches or nectarines for export are listed and the specific signs that these exhibit are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Defects include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The instruments that are used to examine the internal components of peaches and nectarines are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Penetrometer, sharp knife, FDA (Fruit Density Apparatus). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The unspecified internal defects that render the peaches and nectarines unsuitable for export are described. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Monitor the cold chain regimens/protocols to maintain the condition of export peaches and nectarines. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The protocol and maintenance criteria include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The climacteric characteristics of peaches and nectarines are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The post harvest physiological processes that peaches and nectarines undergo and the effects that refrigeration has on these processes is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The temperature regimes/protocols that are recommended for the transportation and storage of peaches and nectarines are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The consequences of not following the recommended temperature regimes/protocols for peaches and nectarines are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The basic principles of airflow management, and their applicability to peaches and nectarines are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The necessity of utilising cartons that allow sufficient ventilation for peaches and nectarines is explained and the various types of ventilation that are utilised, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The various cold chain facilities that require verification are listed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Facilities include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The inland loading procedures for peaches and nectarines and the various items that require verification as per the SOPs are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Verification items include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The procedures for inland RRMT (Refrigerated Road Motor Transport) loading, as per the South African Road Distribution Association specifications are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 10 |
The shipping, voyage and discharge temperature management, including the shipping temperature regimes that must be followed for peaches and nectarines, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 11 |
The various equipment and instruments that are used in monitoring and maintaining the cold chain are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Equipment and instruments include but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Determine the outcome of the quality assessment for a peach or nectarine consignment. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The outcome criteria include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The various documentation that will affect the evaluation of a peach or nectarine consignment and the effect that these have on the determination parameters of acceptable quality is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The food safety considerations that determine the acceptability of a peach or nectarines consignment for export, as per regulations are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Considerations include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The various packaging and marking requirements that are considered in the evaluation of a peach or nectarine consignment, as per regulations, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Requirements include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The importance that the evaluation of external quality findings against the allowable tolerances and standards has on the determination of acceptability of a peach or nectarine consignment is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The role that the evaluation of internal quality findings, compared to the allowable tolerances and standards, has on the determination of acceptability of a peach or nectarine consignment is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The documentation and procedures that have to be followed on the approval of a peach or nectarine consignment are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation and procedures include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The documentation and procedures that have to be followed on the rejection of a peach or nectarine export consignment and the alternative markets that may be considered for this consignment are explaine. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation and procedures include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The maximum period from inspection to shipping, for which a peach or nectarine export certificate is valid, is given and the procedures and documentation that must be followed for the subsequent re inspection are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The procedures that must be followed when an appeal has been lodged, are described. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or communities by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
The learner is able to use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
The learner is able to contribute to the full personal development of themselves and the social and economic development of the society at large.
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors must:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
The Learner:
At this level the communication/reporting of issues arising in the workplace, is embedded in the specific outcomes and the related assessment criteria. It is understood that, due to the nature of the work environment and the skills level of the Learner, that the aspects of teamwork form an integral part of the necessary specific outcomes and related assessment criteria. The points included under the notes, should be included when the qualifying Learners are being assessed. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 58350 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Perishable Produce Exportation | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Elective | 58348 | National Certificate: Perishable Produce Export Technology | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |