All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Assess the quality of groundnuts for the local and export markets |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
243906 | Assess the quality of groundnuts for the local and export markets | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Secondary Agriculture: Processing | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Secondary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 15 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in Mathematical Literacy and Communication at NQF Level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Outline the background and structure of the local and export groundnut industries. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The background includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The origin of the various groundnut varieties and the chief cultivars that have been produced from these are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The major groundnut production areas in South Africa are identified and the main cultivars that are grown in each area are listed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The products that are derived from groundnuts and the contribution that these products provide to the overall groundnut sales are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Derivative products include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The extent of the global groundnut export industry, with regard to production levels and statistics are outlined and the countries that constitute South Africa's competition are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The composition and operation of the various steps in the groundnut production and export chain are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The role players in the groundnut industry are listed and the function that they each perform is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The positive contribution that ongoing research and development has on the viability and profitability of groundnut production is described. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the definitions and applications of the terminology used in the of groundnut industry. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The reasons why all role players and participants in the of groundnut industry should understand and use the specific terminology are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The definition and relevance of the general terminology that is used in the export industry is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
General terminology includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The definition and application of the terminology that is used to describe and determine the quality of groundnuts is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Specific groundnut terminology includes but is not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe the legislative and logistical requirements for local and export markets and the necessary processes to ensure compliance. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The processes include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The impact that production and harvesting methods can have on the quality of groundnuts is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A brief outline of the shelling and other post harvest processes is explained and the areas where the quality of the groundnuts may be jeopardised, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The various grading procedures for local and export markets are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Grading procedures include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The warehousing handling procedures, as per the regulations or SOPs are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The legislative requirements that must be met before an exportation inspection of groundnuts will be conducted, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Legislative requirements include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The various food safety standards that must be adhered to and the procedures to ensure compliance to these are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The packing requirements for local and export markets are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The marking requirements for containers and consignments to signify that groundnuts are destined for local or export markets, as per the regulations or SOPS, are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The logistics that have to be verified before an export inspection may be conducted are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Logistics include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 10 |
The necessity and benefits of establishing and implementing a quality management system for groundnut exportation are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Necessity and benefits include but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Draw a representative sample of groundnuts for inspection. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The sampling range includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The aims and objectives of sampling and the importance of obtaining a representative sample are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The principles of sampling and the reasons why these must be applied when groundnut sampling is conducted are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Principles include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The sampling methodology and the criteria for examination of a groundnut consignment as per regulations or the company's SOPs are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The size and percentage of a groundnut consignment that must be drawn for inspection, as per the regulations or the company's SOPs are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The methods of drawing a representative sample of groundnuts, relative to the mass/size of a consignment are demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Sampling methods include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The procedures for the conducting of MRL sampling for groundnuts are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The importance of aflatoxin sampling and the procedures to draw a representative sample for testing are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The importance of identifying and including possible deviating specimens when conducting sampling is explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Determine the quality of groundnuts for compliance to local and export market requirements. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The quality criteria include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The importance that the sensorial inspection plays in the identification of detrimental substances in a groundnut consignment and the particular odours that must be recognised, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The methods to determine the moisture content of a groundnut consignment are explained and the acceptable moisture levels for the various grades are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The procedures to determine the class of a groundnut pod consignment and a shelled kernel consignment are related and the various classes including their respective characteristics are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The methods to determine the percentage of broken pods, open pods, shelled kernels and foreign matter in a consignment of groundnut pods is described and the allowable proportion of these, as per the standards is related. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The methods to determine the percentage of pods, damaged testa, broken kernels and foreign matter in a consignment of shelled kernels is described and the allowable proportion of these, as per the standards is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The methods to determine the percentage of unsound, blemished and soiled kernels of a consignment of shelled kernels is described and the allowable proportion of these, as per the standards is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The methods to determine the percentage of split kernels in a consignment of whole kernels is described and the allowable proportion of these, as per the standards is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The methods to determine the percentage of whole kernels in a consignment of split kernels is described and the allowable proportion of these, as per the standards is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The procedures to determine the percentage of kernels on various screens, as per the regulations or SOPs are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 10 |
The various non conformities in a groundnut consignment that may render it unsuitable for export are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Non conformities include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 11 |
The equipment and instruments that are used to examine groundnuts for compliance to the standards are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Equipment and instruments include but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Describe the transport and ship loading procedures for a groundnut consignment. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The procedures include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The health and safety precautions that must be observed whilst conducting an evaluation of a groundnut consignment are detailed and the various items of personal protective equipment that must be used are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Protective items includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The procedures to verify the transport registration and current certification as per food safety legislation, are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The procedure to verify the inland loading and transport/shipping documentation against the consignment specifications are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The procedures to verify the cleanliness of the vessel and its fumigation status as per the standards and SOPs are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The importance of inspecting the facilities that are used for the storing and conveying of groundnuts to the ships hold is explained and the components that must be inspected are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Facilities include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The procedures for the monitoring of the moisture content of the groundnuts as per the regulations and SOPs are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The importance of monitoring the loading of groundnuts into the vessel's hold and the implications that an insect infestation or the contamination of the groundnuts by other products has on the acceptability of a consignment is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The tolerances that are allowed in the gauging of the degree of contamination of a consignment are detailed and the procedures for the halting of the loading process, unloading and fumigation of the groundnuts and hold are explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Determine the outcome of the quality assessment of a groundnut consignment. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The outcome criteria include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The documentation that is required for the evaluation of a groundnut consignment and the effect that the various types of documents have on the determination parameters of acceptable quality is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The food safety considerations that determine the acceptability of a groundnut consignment for export, as per regulations are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Food safety considerations include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The various packaging and marking requirements that are considered in the evaluation of a groundnut consignment, as per regulations, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Requirements include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The importance that the evaluation of the quality findings against the allowable tolerances and standards has on the determination of acceptability of a groundnut consignment is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The documentation and procedures that have to be followed on the approval of a groundnut consignment are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation and procedures include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The documentation and procedures that have to be followed on the rejection of export approval and the alternative markets that may be considered for the groundnut consignment are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Documentation and procedures include but are not limited to:
|
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or communities by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
The learner is able to use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
The learner is able to contribute to the full personal development of themselves and the social and economic development of the society at large.
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
The Learner:
At this level the communication/reporting of issues arising in the workplace, is embedded in the specific outcomes and the related assessment criteria. It is understood that, due to the nature of the work environment and the skills level of the Learner, that the aspects of teamwork form an integral part of the necessary specific outcomes and related assessment criteria. The points included under the notes, should be included when the qualifying Learners are being assessed. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 58348 | National Certificate: Perishable Produce Export Technology | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Sierk Ybema Grain Services |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |