All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate team resource management within a specific work environment |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
244209 | Demonstrate team resource management within a specific work environment | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Aerospace Operations | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences | Physical Sciences | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The concept of Team Resource Management (TRM) is an accepted practice within industry and is intended to positively influence the learner's inter-team and intra-team behaviours. Learners will understand the influence of human performance, including human physiological systems, human information processing, human behaviour and personal health factors, in the work environment. It is intended to show how human capabilities and limitations can influence task performance and safety in the work environment.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: Learners who have achieved this unit standard will increase their opportunities for professional development and employability within the Aviation industry. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Communication at NQF Level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Team resource management includes but is not limited to information, equipment and people.
The work environment could include but is not limited to aerospace, defence, mining or any work place that depends on integrated team work. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain concepts associated with Human Factors (HF). |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The concepts of human factors are derived from the psychology, medicine, engineering, human physiology, sociology, anthropometry disciplines. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Human factor developments within the work environment are explained in the context of historical occurrences. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The significance of safety and human factors training is explained in the context of its impact on the work environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Vulnerability of humans to error under different circumstances in the work environment is explained with reference to theories of human error. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Physiological aspects influencing human interaction in the work environment are explained with reference to safety. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Physiological aspects include but are not limited to shift work, sleep disturbances. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Aspects of psychology influencing human interaction within workplace operations are explained with reference to safety. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Aspects of psychology include but are not limited to personality types, self concept, attitude development, cognitive dissonance, motivation and performance, learning drives, human error and reliability, information processing, errors induced by external factors (ergonomics, organisations. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Explain concepts associated with team resource management (TRM). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hazardous attitudes are explained within the workplace team environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Communication factors influencing human performance are described within the workplace team environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Importance of situational awareness influences is explained as experienced within the workplace team environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Importance of human judgement and decision-making is explained as applicable to the workplace team environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Impact of stress on human performance is described within the workplace team environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Teamwork strategies are explained within the workplace team environment. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Apply team resource management (TRM) concepts in a specific work context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The role of situational awareness is explained in terms of its impact on workplace safety and meeting of operational objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Interpersonal communication and interaction are explained in terms of its importance in a TRM context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Problem solving and decision-making techniques are applied in given situations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The concepts of team functioning are explained in terms of their impact on workplace safety and meeting of operational objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The concept of stress and stress management techniques are explained within the context of TRM. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Threat and error management models are evaluated and selected for use in a given situation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Own behaviour in structured environment is evaluated in order to determine effectiveness of actions and decisions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
An individual's ability to assess group dynamics is evaluated in order to determine effectiveness of actions and decisions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Group dynamics should be assessed in inter and intra team situations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The influence of TRM concepts in given situations is evaluated in order to enhance workplace safety. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Given situations include but are not limited to case studies, simulation. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Learners who are not competent in the language proficiency standard for ICAO defined operational English at ICAO Level 4 will find it difficult to meet licensing requirements.
Definitions/Terminology: Human factors (HF): Team resource management (TRM): |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Fundamental | 58581 | National Certificate: Air Traffic Support | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | TETA |
Fundamental | 60549 | National Diploma: Aeronautical Information Management Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2016-12-31 | TETA |
Fundamental | 59256 | National Diploma: Flight Dispatch | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2016-12-31 | TETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Aviation Training Academy |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |