SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Conduct peace support operations 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
244629  Conduct peace support operations 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Maritime Defence 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security Safety in Society 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  6 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 		 2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30   2027-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
This unit standard will be useful for people who have completed warship safety management and bridge watch-keeping within a naval context, as well as warship operations management, and wish to progress to positions of command in a maritime surface warfare environment.

This qualification will give them the opportunity to develop and balance their practical leadership skills with the essential knowledge of international legislation, regulations and policy needed to manage peace support operations as part of the competence required to earn a formal qualification in Warship Command and Control.

People credited with this unit standard are able to:
  • Demonstrate an understanding of international legislation, regulations and policy in relation to a specified peace support mission.
  • Establish and communicate the mission scope and aim.
  • Direct peace support operations.
  • Evaluate operational effectiveness for a specified peace support mission. 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    It is assumed that learners are competent in:
  • Communications at NQF Level 4.
  • Naval Command. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria.

    The following scope and context applies to the whole unit standard:
  • Peace support includes: Escort duties, Meeting 'area', Blockade (search and investigate), Diplomatic, Search and rescue.
  • The Captain must be competent to play an diplomatic role, as required, which may include: going ashore, speaking to people, representing country. 
    		•

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Demonstrate an understanding of national and international legislation, regulations and policy in relation to a specified peace support mission. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Legislation, regulations and policy includes:
  • MARPOL, SOLAS, STCW, UN Regulations, AU Regulations, treaties applicable to southern oceans and applicable ROE. 
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Mission objectives and mandates are received, clarified where necessary, and confirmed with the Commanding Authority. Mandates and objectives provide the basis for specific mission planning. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Commanding authority includes:
  • Naval Command, United Nations, African Union.
     
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Discussion of the regulations and treaty frameworks of the commanding authority identifies protocols, conventions and limitations applicable to the current mission. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The mission objectives are examined for compliance and/or conflict with international regulations governing protection of the environment and safety at sea. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Regulations include:
  • MARPOL (pollution and environment), SOLAS (safety at sea), STCW (international regulations governing merchant shipping).
     
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The mission is evaluated for compliance and/or conflict with specific treaties governing areas of planned operations. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Treaties include regulations governing:
  • Piracy, territorial limits, limits to jurisdiction, powers of arrest, boarding.
     
    		•

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Establish and communicate the mission scope and aim. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The aim of the mission is specific, realistic and achievable in terms of force capability and set time parameters, and consistent with overall scope of the mission. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The mission aim is communicated to relevant senior officers at the outset. Communication is clear, concise, and promotes effective information transfer as required to teams on board. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Scope of authority and limitations on engagement are established, and these are reflected in mission plans and detailed operational instructions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Scope and limitations includes:
  • ROE in territorial waters, boarding rights, ROE for pirates, responses to refuges and stowaways, joint operations, combined operations.
     
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Due authority is obtained for all intended support interventions with the relevant local, national and international authorities. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Specific requirements for skilled personnel and/or equipment are established and ensured to be available by the agreed time. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Direct peace support operations. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Decisions are based upon and supported by own knowledge and expertise, as well as consultation with appointed and competent functional experts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Roles and responsibilities for command during peace support operations are clearly defined with respect to envisaged support and assistance. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Support and assistance includes:
  • Escort duties, meeting 'area', blockade (search and investigate), diplomatic mission, search and rescue.
     
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Rules of engagement for the peace support operation are clearly communicated to each role player with particular reference to the scope and limitations of their actions under the banner of the commanding authority. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Communications with other supporting forces, own and other, are within the agreed frameworks and protocols for the specified operation, and consistent with the established chain of command. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Own country and/or authority represented is presented faithfully and in a manner that promotes positive relations in line with the mission objectives. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Decisions and responses made as the mission unfolds are consistent with available information, the emerging situational picture and the regulations of the commanding authority. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    Decisions are made with a degree of urgency appropriate to the demands of the current situation and with proper regard for the political implications of considered actions. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    Decisions are communicated clearly, concisely, and in a manner that promotes confidence and effective responses from officers and crew. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Evaluate operational effectiveness for a specified peace support mission. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Debriefing sessions are conducted in a positive and constructive manner, and include all participants involved in the peace support mission, in accordance with established naval debriefing procedures. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Information gathered is collated and areas for improvement in approach and execution are identified, together with suggested improvements and/or recommendations to the commanding authority. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Own command role is evaluated for impact on the operation, and the contribution to achievement of the mission aim and objectives. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Information relating to the peace support operation is disseminated via approved channels to assist with refinement of equipment, responses and procedures. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Debriefs are conducted to validate and/or contribute to the development of effective training evolutions. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
  • Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredit as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
  • Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQA's policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation.
  • Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies are specified otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems and make decisions using critical and creative thinking. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively with others as members of a team, group, organisation or community. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organise and manage themselves and their activities responsibly and effectively. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively, using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentations. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE 
    Use science and technology effectively and critically showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    Notes to Assessors:

    Assessors should keep the following general principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:
  • Focus the assessment activities on gathering evidence in terms of the main outcome expressed in the title to ensure assessment is integrated rather than fragmented. Remember we want to declare the person competent in terms of the title. Where assessment at title level is unmanageable, then focus assessment around each specific outcome, or groups of specific outcomes.
  • Make sure that evidence is gathered across the entire range, wherever it applies. Assessment activities should be as close to the real performance as possible, and where simulations or role-plays are used, there should be supporting evidence to show the candidate is able to perform in the real situation.
  • Do not focus the assessment activities on each assessment criterion. Rather make sure the assessment activities focus on outcomes and are sufficient to enable evidence to be gathered around all the assessment criteria.
  • The assessment criteria provide the specifications against which assessment judgements should be made. In most cases, knowledge can be inferred from the quality of the performances, but in other cases, knowledge and understanding will have to be tested through questioning techniques. Where this is required, there will be assessment criteria to specify the standard required.
  • The task of the assessor is to gather sufficient evidence, of the prescribed type and quality, as specified in this unit standard, that the candidate can achieve the outcomes again and again and again. This means assessors will have to judge how many repeat performances are required before they believe the performance is reproducible.
  • All assessments should be conducted in line with the following well documented principles of assessment: appropriateness, fairness, manageability, integration into work or learning, validity, direct, authentic, sufficient, systematic, open and consistent.

    The following particular issues should be taken into consideration when assessing against this unit standard:

    Definition of Terms:

    Terms have been clarified as far as possible through the use of range statements. 
    		•

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Elective  58840   National Certificate: Submarine Operations  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  SAS SETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.