SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Analyse various reports pertaining to the gaming floor 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
246742  Analyse various reports pertaining to the gaming floor 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Hospitality, Gaming & Leisure 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 11 - Services Hospitality, Tourism, Travel, Gaming and Leisure 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 4  NQF Level 04  8 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 		 2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2026-06-30   2029-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
The purpose of this unit standard is to enable reports which are drawn from a gaming area to be analysed and variances commented on. The individual should develop competent usage of the appropriate policy and procedure and skills relevant to specific gambling reports. The sub-field should develop a standardised approach to reviewing and reacting to generic industry reports.

On achievement of this unit standard the learner will understand and be able to:
  • Draw and interpret a variety of gaming area reports.
  • Explain how specific reports are formulated or constructed.
  • Analyse reports.
  • Comment on notable conclusions from the analysis.
  • Forward recommendations to appropriate personnel.

    On completion of this unit standard the learner should be ready to develop learning in further processes related to improving efficiency and productivity in a gambling environment. 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    It is assumed that learners are competent in:
  • Communication at NQF Level 3 or equivalent.
  • Mathematical literacy at NQF Level 3 or equivalent.
  • Computer Literacy. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    The typical scope and context of this unit standard is the drawing, analysing and forwarding of regular and irregular gaming area reports in any gambling environment in South Africa. 

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Draw and interpret a variety of gaming area reports. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    A variety of gaming area reports are drawn in accordance with company procedure, appropriate confidentiality level, and due consideration for customers and the smooth running of operations. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Incident and shift reports are interpreted, and general as well as specific information on each correctly identified and explained. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Incident and shift reports include, but are not limited to, smart card system reports, machine performance reports, revenue reports, staff reports.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Regular reports, such as daily, weekly, monthly or other reports are interpreted, and general as well as specific information on each correctly identified and explained. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Explain how specific reports are formulated or constructed. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Totals, sub-totals, percentages and other mathematical data on reports are explained and traced back to component parts in a logical sequence. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Headings, including dates or time periods, are discussed in a manner which shows a thorough understanding thereof. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    A variety of appropriate reports are compared with each other and differences in inputs and outputs clearly and correctly highlighted. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Input information and raw data is traced through to summary and/or exception reports in a manner which indicates knowledge of how a variety of relevant reports are formulated or constructed. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Analyse reports. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Data and information on a variety of reports are understood, including the headings and date or time period of each report. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Report outputs are compared to forecasts or expectations, and variances as well as matches are correctly noted. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Line items as well as sub-totals and totals are analysed on figure-based reports. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Content as well as sub-section and section headings are analysed on commentary-style reports. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Appropriate analysis tools and methods are utilised in a variety of relevant situations and reports. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    Timing, urgency and duration of analysis are appropriate to a variety of relevant situations and reports. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Comment on notable conclusions from the analysis. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Conclusions are drawn as a result of an analysis of a range of appropriate reports. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Notable conclusions are correctly identified and valid reasons attached to each. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Comment is made on notable conclusions and attached to the appropriate report, in written or electronic text form. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Forward recommendations to appropriate personnel. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Recommendations are made, based on comments and conclusions drawn from the analysis of a gaming report. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Recommendations include those in response to the content of the report, as well as to the format, timing, relevance, distribution list, confidentiality and formulation of the report.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    A distribution list and/or appropriate and relevant personnel are identified as potential recipients of the analysis and recommendations, as well as the report. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The analysis and recommendations, and the report, are forwarded to all or part of the identified distribution list, with due regard to timing, urgency and confidentiality. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Policy and procedure are correctly followed in terms of company procedure to fulfil administrative and other relevant requirements in terms of gaming reports and the analysis thereof. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • An individual wishing to be assessed against this unit standard, including through the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), may apply to an assessment agency, assessor or provider institution accredited by the relevant Education and Training Quality Assurance body (ETQA), or one with an appropriate memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the relevant ETQA.
  • Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA, or one with an appropriate MOU with the relevant ETQA.
  • Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard, or assessing this unit standard, must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA, or one with an appropriate MOU with the relevant ETQA.
  • Moderation of assessment will be conducted by the relevant ETQA, or one with an appropriate MOU with the relevant ETQA. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The knowledge, skill and understanding which should be embedded in the process to enable the learner to become competent in all of the Specific Outcomes, based on the appropriate Assessment Criteria, for this unit standard, includes:
  • Knowledge of various appropriate reports.
  • Formulation of specific reports.
  • Differences between regular and irregular reports.
  • Techniques for analysis.
  • Methods of analysis, with conclusions and recommendations.
  • Issues relating to confidentiality and timing.
  • Policy and procedure for completing, forwarding and filing the analysis of gaming area reports. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Problem solving is used when identifying variances in data analysis, determining reasons therefore and providing suggestions toward rectifying the problem. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Planning and organising activities are enhanced in planning the appropriate time for data collection, analysis and forwarding. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collecting, organising and analysing information is highlighted in drawing a variety of gaming area reports. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
  • Communicating conclusions and recommendations provides an opportunity to improve communication skills.
  • Using mathematical Ideas and techniques are concentrated on in checking and analysing numerical data. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE 
    Using technology is emphasised in accessing data from gaming machines and using computer applications for processing reports. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    N/A 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Elective  59098   Further Education and Training Certificate: Gaming Supervision  Level 4  NQF Level 04  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  CATHSSETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.