SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Use written and verbal communication for varied purposes in extension and development 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
253019  Use written and verbal communication for varied purposes in extension and development 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Agricultural Extension 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation Primary Agriculture 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 7  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7  15 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 		 2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30   2027-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
The learner achieving this unit standard will be able to:
  • Write a scientific paper or seminar that is purposeful, factually correct and readable not necessarily for publication in a scientific journal.
  • Present a scientific paper/seminar that is purposeful, factually correct and readable that is consistent the standards of a scientific journal/professional society relevant to extension/development.
  • Write a technical brochure or manual suitable for use by extension/development practitioners with their clients.
  • Prepare and present a scientific poster that is purposeful, factually correct and readable.
  • Write a critique, editorial or rebuttal article presenting a well-argued defence of a scientific opinion.
  • Write a basic policy document within the scope of specialisation. 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    It is assumed that learners attempting this unit standard will have the following knowledge and understanding in place:
  • The ability to identify and understand the purpose and function of the range of documents.
  • Understanding and applying the different writing styles for the range of documents.
  • The ability to choose which type of document is appropriate for which audience and task.
  • The ability to produce correctly the range of documents.
  • Know what is and be able to produce a presentable format for the range of documents.
  • Understand the effect of the appropriate/inappropriate choice of document.
  • Understand and apply citing and referencing systems appropriate to the different types of written communication.
  • Applied understanding of the role and place of written communication in extension/development. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
  • Range of documents refers to but is not limited to reports, memos, news-briefs and popular journal/newspaper articles.
  • Scientific refers to the learners' particular area of specialisation.
  • Peers refers to but is not limited to colleagues of similar scientific background.
  • Specific purpose refers to but is not limited to defending a scientific opinion or engaging in scientific discourse. 
    		•

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Write a scientific paper or seminar that is purposeful, factually correct and readable not necessarily for publication in a scientific journal. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    A problem, topic or issue for scientific paper is chosen that is relevant to the work of the extension/development unit. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    A framework for the paper is determined in compliance with the guidelines of a recognised scientific journal publishing research relevant to extension/development. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    A literature review, discussion of findings from primary research and conclusions are developed in a manner consistent with scientific research standards and in compliance with the guidelines of a recognised scientific journal publishing research relevant to extension/development. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Citing, referencing and style of writing are consistent with scientific research standards and in compliance with the guidelines of a recognised scientific journal publishing research relevant to extension/development. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Present a scientific paper/seminar that is purposeful, factually correct and readable that is consistent the standards of a scientific journal/professional society relevant to extension/development. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The audience/event for which the paper/seminar is intended is assessed to determine the most appropriate format for the presentation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The problem, topic or issue of the presentation is chosen that is relevant to the work of the extension/development unit. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    A written version of the paper/seminar is developed in compliance with the guidelines of the event at which the paper/seminar is to be presented. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    An audio-visual version of the paper/seminar is developed in a manner that is consistent with audience/event at which the paper/seminar is to be presented. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Includes but is not limited to PowerPoint, slides, overhead, interactive exercise.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Questions regarding the paper/seminar are answered demonstrating clear understanding of the content of the paper/seminar and critical thinking skills. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Write a technical brochure or manual suitable for use by extension/development practitioners with their clients. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The audience for the technical brochure/manual is analysed to establish a framework for developing brochure/manual. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The technical content of the brochure/manual is selected to match the needs of the audience and in keeping with the framework. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The technical content of the brochure/manual is scientifically accurate. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Writing style, layout and visuals are consistent with the framework and the analysis of the intended audience. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Prepare and present a scientific poster that is purposeful, factually correct and readable. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The audience/event for which the scientific poster is intended is assessed to determine the most appropriate format for the presentation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The technical content of the brochure/manual is selected to match the needs of the audience and in keeping with the framework. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The technical content of the poster is scientifically accurate. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Writing style, layout and visuals are consistent with the framework and the analysis of the intended audience. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Write a critique, editorial or rebuttal article presenting a well-argued defence of a scientific opinion. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The audience for the critique, editorial or rebuttal article is identified to determine the framework for the document. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The arguments presented by the document can be substantiated with primary or secondary research. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The arguments presented by the document demonstrate critical thinking. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Writing style, layout and visuals are consistent with the framework and the analysis of the intended audience. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 
    Write a basic policy document within the scope of specialisation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The audience for the policy document is identified to determine the framework for the document. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The arguments presented by the document can be substantiated with primary or secondary research. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The arguments presented by the document demonstrate critical thinking. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Writing style, layout and visuals are consistent with the framework and the analysis of the intended audience. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • An individual wishing to be assessed, (including through RPL) against this unit standard may apply to an assessment agency, assessor or provider institution accredited by the relevant ETQA.
  • Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
  • Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider through the relevant ETQA by SAQA.
  • Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    A demonstrated understanding of:
  • Definition and difference between policy, scientific paper, scientific poster, technical brochure/manual, critique.
  • References.
  • Conducting primary and secondary (literature) research.
  • The purpose and characteristics of a policy document, scientific paper, scientific poster, critique and a technical brochure or manual.
  • Concept of insight and integration of ideas.
  • Writing styles.
  • Grammar (sentences, paragraphs, etc).
  • Timeliness, relevance and choice of instrument.
  • Visual presentation, format and layout.
  • Constructing written documents.
  • Citing and referencing systems.
  • Protection of intellectual property (e.g. copyright) and plagiarism.
  • The appropriate/inappropriate choice of document.
  • Applied understanding of the role and place of written scientific communication in extension/development. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking to address agricultural issues. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively with others when participating on project teams. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organize and manage one-self and activities when participating as project team member. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect and organise information when delivering reports. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively and responsibly with stakeholders and the community and when reporting problem areas. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Be culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts when interacting and communicating with communities. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    N/A 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Fundamental  59529   Bachelor of Agriculture Honours: Extension  Level 7  NQF Level 08  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2018-06-30   


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.