All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of the framework underpinning the South African military in a democratic society |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
253914 | Demonstrate an understanding of the framework underpinning the South African military in a democratic society | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Military Professional Development | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Sovereignty of the State | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will equip junior officers at entry level with a basic understanding of the strategic context within which the SANDF operates, the provisioning of military capabilities and the macro structure of the DOD and doctrine applied by the SANDF in fulfilling national imperatives in departmental strategy.
Qualifying learners will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain the strategic context in which the SANDF operates. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The characteristics of the battle space in which the SANDF could be expected to operate are explained in terms of strategic dimensions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Dimensions include geographical, economic, social, security, technological and political. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The mandate and posture of the SANDF are explained in terms of the Regulatory Framework. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Regulatory Framework includes the RSA Constitution, Defence Act, White Paper on Defence and Defence Review. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The role of international and regional bodies responding to conflict is explained in terms of its impact on the SANDF. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
International and regional bodies refer to the United Nations (UN), the African Union (AU) and the South African Development Community (SADC). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The legal framework, within which the SANDF operates, is explained including its deviation from International Humanitarian Law (IHL). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The legal framework refers to the law of war and the law in war. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The universal continuum of conflict is explained in relation to the RSA military strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Explain the SANDF capabilities in terms of operational systems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The tactical level operating systems are explained in terms of the military and force employment strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Tactical level operating systems refer to command and control, manoeuvre, firepower, logistics, protection, intelligence and air defence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The one force concept is explained in terms of combat readiness. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The one force concept includes Regulars, Reserves and Public Service Act Personnel. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The components and sub-components of the SANDF are explained in terms of their contribution towards tactical level operating systems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Components and sub-components refer to SANDF Services and Divisions, combat, combat support and combat service support, functional corps and musterings. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Platforms in use by the SANDF are explained in terms of their contribution to a particular tactical level operating system. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Platforms in use by the SANDF refer to specific vehicles, ships and aircraft, offensive and defensive weapon systems and functional capabilities to be found within the SANDF Services and Divisions. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Explain the DOD's macro-structure in terms of the national management framework. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The national macro-structure is explained in terms of the National Regulatory Framework. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The national coordinating mechanisms are explained in terms of the cabinet committee clusters in which the Department of Defence participates. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The DOD macro-structure is explained in terms of the Defence, Public Service and Public Financial Management Acts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The role and functions of Services and Divisions are explained in terms of the DOD's mission statement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Mission statement includes vision, mission, values and critical success factors. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Departmental Coordinating Mechanisms are explained in terms of governance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Departmental Coordinating Mechanisms include the Council of Defence, Plenary Defence Staff Council, Accountability Management Committee, Secretariat Council and Military Council, |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Explain SANDF doctrinal concepts pertaining to conflict. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Doctrinal concepts refer to levels of war, the two main theories of war, principles of warfare and phases of warfare. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The levels of war are explained in terms of their interrelationship and outcomes at any point in the continuum of conflict. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The SANDF principles of warfare are explained in terms of the military strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The manoeuvrist and attritional approaches to war are explained in terms of the military strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The dimensions of the battle space are explained in terms of their application in the SANDF. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Dimensions of the battle space refer to the dimensions of reach, width, depth, height, subsurface, extraterrestrial, electromagnetic spectrum, time and the psychology. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The phases of warfare, as a framework to military operations, are explained in terms of offensive and defensive operations according to SANDF doctrine. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Phases of warfare refer to the advance, the attack, the defence and retrograde operations. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The essential embedded knowledge is included within the unit standard and will be assessed through the assessment of the specific outcomes and critical cross field outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses show that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made eg when platforms in use by the SANDF are explained in terms of their contribution to a particular tactical level operating system. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, organise and critically evaluate information is demonstrated eg when the components and sub-components of the SANDF are explained in terms of their contribution towards tactical level operating systems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, conceptual and language skills when platforms are explained in terms of their contribution to a particular tactical level operating system. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems is demonstrated by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation when the levels of war are explained in terms of their interrelationship and outcomes at any point in the continuum of conflict. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contributing to full personal development of each learner and the social development of the society at large, when the role and functions of Services and Divisions are explained in terms of the DOD's mission statement. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 59889 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Military Operations | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2010-01-25 | Was SAS SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 78143 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Military Operations | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |