All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate understanding of the various spatial and attribute data transfer formats |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
258646 | Demonstrate understanding of the various spatial and attribute data transfer formats | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Geographical Information Sciences | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction | Physical Planning, Design and Management | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 7 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard has been developed for the GIS occupational area and is intended for persons who aim to achieve career advancement by gaining GIS skills leading to qualification based on unit standards. A person who has successfully completed this unit standard will be able to work with various spatial and attribute data formats.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners are already competent in terms of the:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Range statements are included with specific outcomes as necessary. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Understand vector data transfer formats. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Including but not limited to exchange formats from ESRI, GeoMedia, MapInfo, ReGIS and Autodesk. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Typical things that can go wrong when exchanging vector data are understood as well as the reasons for these. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Including but not limited to data displacement, data scaled, data mirrored, spatial reference problems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Information that is needed to exchange data successfully are understood and explained in terms of vector transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Spatial reference data, coordinate format data, vector data, Index data, attribute data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Data in at least three vector transfer formats can be exported and imported in terms of vector transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
For example: DGN, ESRI MDB, MIF, MID, ESRI SHP, ESRI E00, ESRI Coverage, GeoMedia MDB, MXD, DMP, ORACLE SDO, various ASCII formats. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Understand raster data transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The difference between LOSSY and LOSSLESS raster formats are understood and can be explained in terms of raster transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The constraints of raster data formats are understood and explained in terms of raster transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Bands, Colour models, colour depth, spatial resolution, temporal resolution, spatial reference metadata (header files). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Different data formats are understood and data can be extracted from at least three of these. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
For example: ERS, ECW, MrSID, IMG, HDR, JPG2000, JPG, GeoTIFF, TIFF, PNG, and BMP. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Spatial reference header files for raster data are understood and explained in terms of raster transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
For example WORLD files such as JGW, TFW, PGW, and BPW. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Understand attribute data transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Different data format are understood and data can be extracted from them in terms of attribute data transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
For example DBF and MDB. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The constraints of alphanumerical data formats are understood and explained in terms of attribute data transfer formats. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Key fields, uniqueness constraints, software, delimitation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Various ASCII data formats are understood and data can be extracted from them. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Including but not limited to delimited and fixed format data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
SQL dump data formats are understood and data can be extracted from them. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Essential embedded knowledge will be assessed through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the stipulated assessment criteria. Candidates are unlikely to achieve all the specific outcomes, to the standards described in the assessment criteria, without knowledge of the listed embedded knowledge. This means that for the most part, the possession or lack of the knowledge can be directly inferred from the quality of the candidate's performance. Where direct assessment of knowledge is required, assessment criteria have been included in the body of the unit standard. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Solve problems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team/group/organisation or community. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, organise and critically evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematics and language skills in the modes of oral and written presentations. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically (showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others). |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Display an understanding of the world as a set of related systems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full development of each learner and the social and economic development of society at large. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Terminology:
Lossy: Notes to Assessors: The intention with this Unit Standard is NOT for learners to understand the internal details of exchange formats, but rather to know which files are needed when exchanging data (SHP = SHP, SHX & DBF), what each contains (SHP contains geometry data), what is omitted by the file format (SHP omits spatial reference information), etc. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 63589 | National Diploma: Geographical Information Science | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ESRI SOUTH AFRICA |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |