All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of general database theory |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
258736 | Demonstrate an understanding of general database theory | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Geographical Information Sciences | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction | Physical Planning, Design and Management | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 3 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is useful for people who aim to achieve career advancement in the GIS field and provides them with essential knowledge in relation to database theory.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners are already competent in terms of the following outcomes or areas of learning when starting to learn towards this unit standard:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate knowledge of different database types. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Network databases are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The basic aspects of the relational database model is understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The basic aspects of the object orientation database model is understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Hierarchical databases are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate knowledge of the relational database model. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Relational database rules are understood and an RDBMS is measured against the rules. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Including but not limited to the 12 rules by Dr. E. F. Codd. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The advantages of the relation database model are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The criticism against the relation database model are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Including but not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The relational database model extensions to accommodate the geographic context are understood and explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Explain properties of data structures in a relational database in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Indexes in a relation database are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Unique identifiers as used in a relational database are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Different types of keys in a relational database are understood and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Including but not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Field types used in a relational database are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Including all the types as defined in the SQL 3 standard. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate knowledge of the object orientated database model. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The Object model is understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Standardisation efforts in relation to the object model are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Hybrid relational OO models are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Implementations of the object model are understood and explained in terms of geo-spatial data. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Essential embedded knowledge is dealt with under the specific outcomes section where "Demonstrate Knowledge and Understanding" is required. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Solve problems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team/group/organisation or community. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one`s activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, organise and critically evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematics and language skills in the modes of oral and written presentations. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically (showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others). |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Display an understanding of the world as a set of related systems. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full development of each learner and the social and economic development of society at large. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Terminology:
Notes to Assessors: > DB2. > MS SQL Server. > MySQL. > Oracle. > PostgreSQL. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 63689 | Bachelor of Arts: Geographical Information Science | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-06-30 | |
Core | 63711 | Bachelor of Geographical Information Science (GISc) | Level 7 | NQF Level 07 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-06-30 |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |