All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Plan a naval operation at tactical level |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
259540 | Plan a naval operation at tactical level | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Maritime Defence | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Sovereignty of the State | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is intended for learners within the Sovereignty of the State sub-field who wish to work in the maritime environment as a warfare operations officer on a warship. The learner successfully completing this Unit Standard will gain the essential knowledge and practical skills required of a warfare operations officer who assists, as part of a planning team, in planning naval operations.
The competencies achieved by the learner in this Unit Standard will contribute to the preservation of human life and the defence of South African warships, territorial waters and/or area of responsibility, thus providing a safer and secure society for South African citizens. Learners credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the learner has the following knowledge and skills:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Conduct an analysis of directives received from within the chain of command. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The mission instruction is categorised and interpreted so as to determine the required actions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Categorised refers to identifying the instructions origin and security classification. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Planning for the required action is conducted from which clear force preparation guidelines are given and staff duties are assigned to those under tactical command. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The required action can include planning for joint maritime exercises and operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The mission plan is formulated in accordance with command instructions and available intelligence while ensuring team involvement is appropriate to the classification of the order and the potential contribution of the team member. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The mission plan must include details as mission location, mission duration, mission approach, threat, special personnel and/or equipment, force size, roles and responsibilities and contingency plans. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Passage and navigational planning is conducted with the requirements of the mission and makes provision for controllable and uncontrollable elements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The mission plan is communicated to key personnel at a level of detail appropriate to each target group and an opportunity is given for feedback and questions of clarification. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Written instructions are drawn up which accurately reflect the mission plan and provide guidance for further briefings to personnel affected by the planned operations. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Develop a threat appreciation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Information is gathered from all relevant sources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The information is analysed so as to facilitate decision-making with respect to target identification and classification. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Analysed includes categorising according to type, content and source of information, evaluating information for reliability and determining the threat. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Targets are classified in order to determine the rules of engagement during contact situations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A briefing is given in terms of the appreciated threats implications on the mission plan. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Establish internal and force communications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The types of communication required for the mission are identified and set up to meet the requirements of the mission. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Rules for communication during the mission are communicated to all involved vessels and communication organisations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Communication security is promoted by assigning specific roles, responsibilities and authority to the signal intelligence organisation with respect to signal transmission. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Requirements in terms of signal writing, release and reception are clearly articulated to role-players. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Requirements refers to rules, procedures, formats, content, security classification and frequencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The content of signals is evaluated so as to ensure the information requirements of the mission are achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Information requirements refer to planning, operational tasks and required actions and reactions to achieve the mission purpose. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Establish emission control and security policies. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Emissions include radar, acoustic, radio, electronic counter-measures and laser emissions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The source, type and likely application of detectable emissions are analysed according to mission requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The risks and possible counter measures for transmission frequencies and strengths of emissions are evaluated for various stages of the mission. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A emission control plan is drawn up which clarifies the rules for testing and use of equipment causing emissions during the mission. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Emission control and security is promoted by assigning specific roles, responsibilities and authority to the intelligence organisation with respect to use of equipment and emissions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The execution of the emission control plan is monitored and managed in accordance with mission security requirements and intelligence and/or detection needs. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Allocate weapons and systems at the planning stage. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Type of weapons to counter anticipated threat and/or carry out the mission aim are pre-allocated in accordance with recognised naval doctrine and tactics. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Weapons and munitions allocated for the mission plan are secured and loaded as per standard operating procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Documentation necessary for the weapons and required munitions request is completed as per standard operating procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Designation of vessels is clarified in terms of mission aim and anticipated threat and communicated to relevant command personnel. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Evaluate the mission planning process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Debriefing sessions are conducted in a positive and constructive manner. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Personnel involved are debriefed in accordance with established debriefing procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The evaluation report produced complies with format and content requirements and is forwarded to the appropriate authority via approved channels. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Information relating to the evaluation is disseminated via approved channels to assist with refinement of equipment, responses and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Debriefs are conducted to validate and/or contribute to the development of effective training evolutions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Information pertinent to the evaluation is gathered from all relevant sources and involved personnel. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Fundamental | 64129 | National Certificate: Warship Operations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |