All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Promote effective team work at a mission and in diplomatic practice |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
260002 | Promote effective team work at a mission and in diplomatic practice | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Diplomacy, Protocol and Foreign Affairs Assist | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Sovereignty of the State | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard replaces: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
114702 | Demonstrate effective team work in diplomatic practice | Level 7 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7 | 5 | |
114854 | Practice effective teamwork in agency administration | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 5 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is aimed at learners who would like to identify and develop within themselves strategies to work effectively in a group, mission and within a diplomatic context. The learner will also be able to lead others to participate effectively in group context.
The qualifying learner will be capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners accessing this unit standard are assumed to have an NQF Level 5 qualification or RPL equivalent. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Analyse individuals within a team and the group dynamics within a mission and diplomatic context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Descriptions are provided of the characteristics of effective teams and the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The nature of groups is described in terms of the importance of effective teamwork in diplomatic context and the role of group identity in a mission. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Descriptions are provided of the personality types and the stages of group dynamics within a diplomatic context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Criteria for working as a member of a team are identified and explained, with particular application in a mission or diplomatic context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Behaviour conducive to working as a member of a group are explained in contrast to factors that inhibit effective teamwork in a mission or diplomatic context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Disruptive behaviours are evaluated in terms of the consequences for team performance. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Participate in building relations between group members and other role players. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Role players and their needs are identified and how collaboration satisfies the needs of all team members. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Behaviour promoted is constructive and non-disruptive and positively influences the success and productivity of the team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The importance of team relations between members and other role players is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Communication with other role players promotes discussions in line with team objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Negotiations are carried out where required to promote team building objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Commitment to other role players is honoured in line with team objectives. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Promote team coherence, image and Esprit de Corps. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Methods and techniques for building team coherence and spirit are identified and applied. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Team image is consistent with the values of service delivery (Batho Pele). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Feedback to team members leads to constructive working relationships. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Actions within a group context are respectful of gender, personal, ethical, religious and cultural differences so as to enhance effective interaction between team members. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Situations requiring negotiation are identified and suitable negotiation processes are applied to achieve team goals. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Evaluate and appraise team performance in a mission. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Performance outcomes of individuals and teams are appraised against agreed standards. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Collected appraisal information is accurate, current and complete and recorded in agreed format. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Lessons learnt are communicated as per departmental procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The evaluation highlights opportunities to facilitate performance improvement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Recommendations are provided for coaching and mentoring to improve team performance. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems pertaining to group dynamics. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively in a group within a diplomatic context. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise oneself and one's activities by carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages of being a team player. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively within a group context. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard replaces the following unit standards:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 64329 | National Diploma: Diplomacy | Level 7 | Level N/A: Pre-2009 was L7 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
Fundamental | 64330 | National Certificate: Mission Corporate Services Management | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2020-07-30 | PSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |