All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Apply the techniques of data processing |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
262557 | Apply the techniques of data processing | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Statistics | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences | Mathematical Sciences | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of statistics. Learners would be able to contribute to a quality hierarchy of skills required to provide quality services in statistics by applying the techniques of data processing.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Code, enter, verify and validate data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Responses from an open question are classified and coded into numerical values. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The questionnaires are reviewed to ensure that the minimum data required are reported. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Data are verified and validated using a variety of methods to ensure accuracy of data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Data from paper questionnaires are captured into an electronic file using the available means. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Frequency tables are constructed to validate data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Quality control measures are discussed in order to assess and evaluate the quality of data. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Check and edit data. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Checking and editing is done manually as well as using computer software. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Reasons for editing census and survey data are stated to justify the editing stage of data processing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Types and sources of errors are identified and described to reflect on what to look for during editing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Different types of edits are explained and implemented for a given data set. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Types of edits includes but not limited to validity, range, duplication, consistency, historical, statistical and miscellaneous edits. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The effectiveness and limitations of the various types of edits are discussed to reflect on data quality issues. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Computer commands are written to perform automatic data editing. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Available software is used to perform micro and macro edits to identify errors in data files. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Risks associated with editing are discussed to highlight the issues to be careful with. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Impute missing values under supervision. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The term imputation is explained within the context of missing values. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Different imputation techniques are described to reflect the relative advantage and disadvantage of each technique. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Imputation techniques include but not limited to substitution, estimator, cold deck and hot deck. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Appropriate imputation technique is used to replace a missing, invalid or an incomplete response. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The purpose of imputation is explained to highlight the significance of the techniques. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Transform the structure of data and tabulate the data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The data structure used to input data is transformed for tabulation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Appropriate tables are constructed to summarize data. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The data structure is transformed to one that is suitable for statistical packages. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The data are prepared for storage and archiving. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
> Internal moderation. > External moderation. > An assessor, accredited by the relevant ETQA, will assess the learner's competency. > Assessment procedures will be supplied by the ETQA in alignment with NSB requirements. > All assessment activities must be fair, so that all candidates have equal opportunities. Activities must be free of gender, ethnic or other bias. > Assessment and moderation procedures, activities and tools must be transparent, affordable and support development within the field, sub-field and NQF. > Questions and answers to determine theoretical knowledge are expected. > Assessment of a portfolio of evidence. > Direct observation in simulated and/or controlled work conditions. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names, functions and locations of:
Purpose of processes and procedures of: Attributes, properties, characteristics related to: Cause and effect, implications of: > Incorrect coding, editing and entering of data lead to misinformation. Procedures and techniques: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies: Theory: Rules, laws, principles: Relationships, systems: |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 65649 | National Certificate: Official Statistics | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |