All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of mineral valuation |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
336915 | Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of mineral valuation | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
Task Team - Fabrication and Extraction | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Fabrication and Extraction | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
People credited with this unit standard are able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understand of the terminology used in mine evaluation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The reef width, channel width and stoping width are explained in the context of mineral valuation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The multiple reef types/bands are explained in the context of mineral valuation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The meaning and expression of grade, pay-chutes, block value, block width and block call factor are explained in the context of mineral valuation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The terms pay limit and/or cut off grades are explained in the context of mineral valuation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The meaning of metal accounted for and metal called for and the factors influencing these in terms of MCF, where applicable are explained in the context of mineral valuation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The terms cmg/t, pgms/t and g/t are explained in the context of mineral valuation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The meaning of ore dilution and factors influencing this are explained in the context of mining operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The difference between ore reserve and ore resource is understood in the context of mining operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The typical actions of a supervisor to address a Mine Call Factor problem (real or apparent metal losses) are explained in terms of the relevant site-specific requirements and procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Explain the methodologies used in accurate face sampling. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The frequency of sampling required to confirm face valuation is explained in terms of the relevant site-specific procedure. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The potential hazards involved in face sampling are identified and dealt with in accordance with specified requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The preparation and work required for accurate sampling of different reef types are conducted in accordance with site-specific requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The various sampling methods used are identified and explained in terms of standard sampling methodology and practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Quality control measures are applied in accordance with the relevant site-specific quality assurance procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Evaluate sampling reports and decide on an appropriate course of action. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Stoping and development sampling reports are compiled and submitted in accordance with site-specific requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Geological information given is interpreted from the sampling reports in the context of mine evaluation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Grade and stope width decisions are derived and communicated in accordance with site-specific requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Over and under breaking and cost implications are calculated, considered and communicated in accordance with site-specific requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Off reef mining recommendations are made in accordance with site-specific requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Corrective action is taken in accordance with legal and site-specific requirements. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Calculate square metres, tons, grade, mineral content and kilograms of metal. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The value for various reef widths are calculated, given information on reef widths and grade, channel width and grade and stoping width and grade. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Square metres, tons and panel/face kilograms of metal are calculated by using standard methods. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Recovered kilograms of metal are determined by means of MCF and plant recovery factors. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Profit/loss is determined in terms of costs and metal recovered for a particular section of a mine by means of the standard methods of calculation. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The following embedded knowledge will be assessed in an integrated way in the context of the unit standard:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems and make decisions using critical and creative thinking:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as members of a team, group, organisation or community:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage themselves and their activities responsibly and effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively, using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentations:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Terminology:
Specified requirements: Specified requirements include legal and site-specific requirements and are contained in one or more of the following documents: Legal: Site specific: > Accurate and safe sampling procedures. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 74490 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Mining Operations | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MQA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |