All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Adjust and maintain production process |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
9922 | Adjust and maintain production process | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | 30 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2005-07-19 | 2008-07-19 | SAQA 0160/05 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2009-07-19 | 2012-07-19 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
337140 | Adjust and maintain the production/assembly process | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | 7 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Starting up, monitoring, adjusting and shutting down a production line. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
"Adjust and maintain production process" implies the active involvement of the learner in bringing the production line back into specification by responding to equipment indicators when deviations occur. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Prepare for work activity. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Assisting with tooling installation includes acting on instructions, connecting services and tightening bolts.
Tools include hand tools, power tools and measuring equipment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Monitor and adjust process. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Tools and instruments include hand and power tools and measuring equipment.
Adjustments include adjustments to feed, speed and other controls. Maintaining tooling condition includes protecting tooling and forming surfaces from contamination and damage, cleaning and clearing cooling channels, applying corrosion inhibitors and cleaning agents, removing particles and dust from tooling surfaces and moving components, lubricating and applying release agents. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Perform finishing activities on product produced. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Finishing activities include packing and moving of products to other production lines. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Perform quality tests and inspections on materials, components and product. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Measuring and testing equipment includes rulers, verniers, go/no/go gauges, master samples, micrometers.
Tests include functionality tests. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Recognise and report changes and/or malfunctions while operating. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Work safely with due care for self, fellow workers, equipment, materials and the environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Document all occurrences on shift. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Discuss and explain incidents and problems related to the process, the materials and the products. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Process control data indicates manufacturing process is in compliance with standards and specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Manufacturing process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Production output meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Machinery runs effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Tooling installed and maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Quality inspection and test results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. The person relieving me knows what the production status is. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Sufficient materials available 2. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner 3. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given 4. All monitoring activities and adjustments are accurately documented 5. Tooling installation is not delayed by poor planning and interruptions to production are minimised 6. Appropriate quality tests and inspections are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results 7. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately 8. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process 9. Monitoring activities and adjustments carried out are accurately documented 10. Work is carried out in a safe manner 11. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained Understanding confirmed: 1. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process 2. Implications of failing to replace worn tooling on product produced 3. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of instruments 4. Consequences of materials spillage 5. Respond to 'what if' and 'why questions about the relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final product |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
My assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assurer who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. My assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
I can be assessed in the language of my choice although if I have to report incidents or conditions to someone else, I will be assessed on my ability to report in the language commonly used in my working environment. I will be assessed in the workplace but I can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. I can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
1. Names & functions of:
2. Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties: 3. Sensory cues: 4. Purpose of: 5. Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: 6. Procedures and techniques: 7. Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: 8. Theory: rules, principles, laws: 9. Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 337140, which is "Adjust and maintain the production/assembly process", Level 3, 7 credits. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 24196 | National Certificate: Construction Material Manufacturing | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CETA |
Core | 48916 | National Certificate: Explosives Manufacturing Operations | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2009-06-17 | Was CHIETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 21015 | National Certificate: Metal and Engineering Manufacturing Processes | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2011-02-16 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 66489 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Foundry Operations | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2013-11-07 | MERSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Big Tree Group |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |