All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Guide and support learners |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
9932 | Guide and support learners | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Occupationally-directed ETD Practitioners | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Adult Learning | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2000-10-11 | 2003-10-11 | SAQA 0532/00 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2004-10-11 | 2007-10-11 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
117874 | Guide learners about their learning, assessment and recognition opportunities | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Practitioners who have achieved this unit standard will be able to give guidance and support to learners. They will also be able to refer learners to appropriate counselling or career information agencies.
This competence complements other ETD competences and enables the individual to further develop in a broader range of guidance and support skills. It contributes to the development of supportive environments for personal development. In addition, a community of practitioners with guidance and learner support competence will be able to support the implementation of the National Qualifications Framework and the Skills Development Strategy by referring learners to appropriate employment services agencies, provider institutions, etc. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Practitioners applying to enter a learning programme for this ETD standard -or applying to be assessed against this ETD standard -are assumed to have a qualification or equivalent competence in an occupation in which they will practice this ETD competence.
This standard describes the ETD competence which will be needed for them to guide and support learners in relation to their occupational competence. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The following statement provides a general guide to the scope and complexity of the competence expected of a practitioner:
1. Practitioners are required to demonstrate that they can perform the specific outcomes with understanding and reflexivity. However, at this level they will have internalised the "rules" or principles, which inform what they do, and will no longer be operating consciously with such rules. 2. The practitioner is required to demonstrate the competence described in this standard in the context of learning programmes/learner ships. 3. The specific outcomes should be performed in line with an established methodology for guiding and supporting learners. At this level the practitioner should be able to describe two alternative methodologies; to explain how their performance would differ if they used them and to justify their choice of methodology. 4. At this level, practitioners should be able to relate knowledge beyond their occupational and ETD competences to the performance of the ETD competence described in this standard. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify learner's needs. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Identify learner's needs regarding, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Analyse problem/need and decide on appropriate action. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Provide advice to learners. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Provide advice to learners, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Provide support to learners. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Provide support to learners, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Refer learners to specialist guidance and counselling services. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Keep records of interactions with the learner. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Keep records of interactions with the learner in keeping with, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Evaluate own performance. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Evaluate own performance by, e.g.:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
1. Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard or will assess this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. 3. Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. Therefore anyone wishing to be assessed against this unit standard may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Practitioners should be able to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of:
1. How to identify learner needs, principles. 2. What kinds of support learners are likely to need and where to find it. 3. Strategies, techniques and activities for providing guidance and support to individual learners. 4. Knowing to whom, when and why to refer learners, outside of the immediate context. 5. The required record keeping for guidance and support given to learners. 6. Techniques for reflecting on own performance and integrating lessons learned into future practice 7. Outcomes-based forms of guiding and supporting learners, which are consistent with the aims and objectives of the National Qualifications Framework and Skills Development Strategy. 8. Forms of practice, which promote the values described in the Bill of Rights and the principles underpinning the Employment Equity Act. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critical evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively by, e.g.:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Effective use of science and technology. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation -by. e.g.:
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 117874, which is "Guide learners about their learning, assessment and recognition opportunities", Level 5, 6 credits.
VALUES The ETD practice outlined in this unit standard should promote the values of affirmation and non-discrimination as described in the Bill of Rights and Employment Equity Act. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 13739 | Certificate in Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 13740 | Certificate: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 23095 | Higher Education and Training Certificate: Development Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 48908 | National Certificate: Sanitation Project Co-ordination | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | EWSETA |
Elective | 64650 | National Diploma: Early Childhood Development | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2020-07-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 21847 | National Diploma: Manufacturing Management: Food and Beverage | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | FOODBEV |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ABM COLLEGE SA (PTY) LTD |
2. | ACADEMY OF PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD |
3. | Accreditation & Training Services |
4. | AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD |
5. | Aldabri 106 Institute for Quality (Pty) Ltd |
6. | Amogelang Marketing and Training |
7. | Annacol Training Consultants |
8. | Assessment and Entrepreneurship Centre |
9. | ASSESSMENT COLLEGE OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD |
10. | ATS Institute |
11. | ATTE - The Training Edge |
12. | B T Group of Companies Pty Ltd |
13. | BOLAND COLLEGE |
14. | Bonang Training & Development |
15. | BPC HR Consultants |
16. | Brainwave Projects 1997 CC |
17. | Business Development Unit (PTY)Ltd |
18. | Caversham Education Institute |
19. | College of Cape Town - Athlone Campus |
20. | Compass Academy of Learning |
21. | CORE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL |
22. | Dabulamanzi & Njabulo Ndaba Consulting cc |
23. | Dee s Training PTY LTD |
24. | Directflo |
25. | DM Training Consultants |
26. | Early Learning Foundation Montessori Teacher Training |
27. | EDU-Bless College |
28. | Edu-Build Institute |
29. | EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION INC |
30. | ERGO MAPHELONG INSTITUTE (PTY) LTD |
31. | FALSE BAY TECHNICAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION & TRAINING COLLEGE |
32. | FLAVIUS MAREKA FET COLLEGE |
33. | FURNITURE WORLD TRAINING CENTRE |
34. | G & K Gray Training cc |
35. | Goldfields TVET College |
36. | Grassroots Adult Education and Training Trust |
37. | GWALA TRAINING SERVICES |
38. | HDPSA |
39. | Headspace Consulting (PTY) Ltd |
40. | IEB Assessment Education and Training (Pty) Ltd |
41. | INGWE FET COLLEGE |
42. | Institute of Professional Studies and Services |
43. | Isibani Skills Academy |
44. | Isibani Soluntu Development Trust |
45. | Itireleng Bokamoso Trading Development Services and Associates |
46. | Katiso-kuno Consulting |
47. | Kenako Investments |
48. | Khululeka Community Education Centre |
49. | Kids Academy |
50. | Klein Karoo Resource Centre |
51. | Learning Performance Link |
52. | Leronsa Trading Enterprise |
53. | Li Lichule Trading cc |
54. | Loago Business Consulting |
55. | LONA ULWAZI CONSULTANTS CC |
56. | M Power Learning and Development |
57. | MACCAUVLEI LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
58. | Marematlou Training Institute |
59. | MATHS CENTRE INCORPORATING SCIENCES |
60. | Matimba Management and Labour cc |
61. | MENTORNET (PTY) LTD |
62. | Mochochonono Training Solutions cc |
63. | Montessori Teacher Training Centre South Africa |
64. | Networx for Career Development |
65. | Northern Cape Urban College: Kimberley Campus |
66. | Northlink College |
67. | Northshore Trading 19CC t/a Makakhaunye Training and Development Agency |
68. | Ntevho-Ketso Training and Recruitement Consultancy cc |
69. | NTI College |
70. | Orbit FET College - Central Office |
71. | Pace Career Centre |
72. | Petra institute of Development (PTY) Ltd |
73. | Pineridge Training Centre |
74. | PMA Holding (Pty) Ltd |
75. | Pro-Ed Training |
76. | Professional Development and Training Institute (Pty) Ltd |
77. | Project Literacy |
78. | QPD CONSULTANTS |
79. | Read Educational Trust |
80. | Resonance Institute of Learning |
81. | Retshetse Training Project |
82. | Rhodes University |
83. | SANTS College |
84. | Sigodi Development Services and Associates (SDS) cc |
85. | Sirius Training |
86. | Sisazi Consulting |
87. | Siyahluma Education Institute |
88. | SKU Training and Assessment |
89. | South Cape Public FET College - George Campus |
90. | Southern African Youth Movement |
91. | Spotru Training Centre |
92. | SPS Consulting (Pty) Ltd |
93. | Sustainability Institute Trust |
94. | T Mabuya & Associates (Pty) Ltd |
95. | TEAM CONSULTANTS CC |
96. | Tembe Service Providers |
97. | Thabelanang t/a Thabelanang Trading Enterprise |
98. | Thasha Training and Consulting |
99. | The College of Modern Montessori |
100. | The Finishing College (Pty) Lt |
101. | The Fundamentals Training Centre |
102. | THE GMC GROUP PTY LTD |
103. | The Institute of People Development |
104. | The Iscariota Group (Pty) Ltd |
105. | Thembekile training consulting |
106. | Thuto-Botshabelo Training and Projects (Pty) Ltd |
107. | TMG Quality Services |
108. | Tshwane South College for (ECD Academy) |
109. | Ulwazi Training & Development |
110. | Umzansi Educational Programs Centre |
111. | UNIVERSAL COLLEGE OUTCOMES SA |
112. | VERYCOOLIDEAS |
113. | Vuselela TVET College |
114. | Wildfire Development Training Agency |
115. | Winston Academy |
116. | World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |