Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
The problem is analysed and defined and criteria are identified for an acceptable technical design solution in terms of the context, brief and research.
Relevant information, knowledge and skills are identified for solving the architectural design and architectural technology problem.
A technical design solution for a multi- story building, or a long span structure is produced considering all the relevant environmental, sustainable, technical and contextual issues presented in the architectural problem.
Possible design and technological approaches are produced and analysed in terms of a feasible, workable solution for the project or problem.
Possible solutions are drawn, modelled and analysed in terms of the relevant criteria and outcomes.
Possible solutions are evaluated and the best solution is selected for presentation.
The design and technology solution is produced in an appropriate architectural presentation format, in terms of standard architectural presentation techniques.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2:
An appropriate mix of knowledge in the field of building science, structures, construction and technology is demonstrated.
Theories, principles and the relevant regulations are utilised in the solving of complex technical problems.
Formal analysis and computer aided design are utilised in the production and modelling of suitable solutions.
Concepts, ideas and theories are communicated through an appropriate architectural presentation format.
Reasoning about and conceptualising architectural materials, details, components, systems or processes is clearly communicated.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3:
The structural design problem is formulated to satisfy applicable standards, codes of practice and legislation.
The technical design process is planned and managed to focus on important issues and deals with the relevant material and structural constraints.
Knowledge, information and resources are acquired and evaluated in order to apply appropriate principles and design tools to provide a workable solution.
Alternatives are evaluated for implementation and a preferred solution is selected based on material, technical and structural analysis.
The selected structural design is assessed in terms of the theoretical, and material loading principles.
The structural design and relevant information is communicated in a technical portfolio of drawings and written report.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4:
Research is planned and conducted within the appropriate theoretical discipline.
Available literature is searched and material is critically evaluated for suitability to the investigation.
Information is analysed, interpreted and derived from available research texts and data and conclusions are drawn from an analysis of all available texts and research.
The purpose, process and outcomes of the research are recorded in written documents.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5:
The structure, style and language of written and oral communication are appropriate for the purpose of the communication and the target audience.
Graphics used are appropriate and effective in enhancing the meaning of text.
Visual materials and advanced computer animations are used to enhance oral communications.
Accepted methods are used for providing information to others involved in the architectural profession and the built environment.
Oral communication is delivered fluently with the intended meaning being apparent through an oral portfolio presentation.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6:
The impact of architectural design and technology is identified and dealt with in terms of the benefits and limitations to the community and/or society.
The architectural design is analysed in terms of the impact on the urban context, environment, the user and/or the community.
Personal, social, economic, cultural values and requirements of those who are affected by the architectural proposal are taken into consideration.
These are presented and discussed through the presentation of written report and a portfolio of drawings.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7:
The nature and complexity of ethical dilemmas is described, analysed and solutions proposed.
Ethical reasoning is applied to evaluate architectural solutions.
Continued competence is maintained through keeping abreast of up-to-date legislation and techniques available in the workplace.
The system of continuous professional development is understood and embraced as an on-going process.
Responsibility is accepted for consequences stemming from own actions.
Judgements are made in decision making during problem solving and design.
Decision making is limited to area of current competence and delivered in a written report.
Integrated Assessment:
Formative and summative assessments will include inter alia the following:
Formative Assessment:
Individual and collaborative group tutorials with memoranda and direct lecturer and/or tutor formative feedback.
Individual and collaborative Assignments/Projects with direct discussions providing formative feedback.
Class tests with direct formative feedback via memoranda and discussions.
Computer aided design renderings and simulations.
Individual projects and assignments including feedback via assessment rubrics and scoring.
Group projects and assignments including scoring and feedback via assessment rubrics.
Individual Presentations including feedback via assessment rubrics, lecturer and peer scoring.
Summative Assessment:
Closed and/or open book tests including scoring and feedback.
Closed book examinations.
Design portfolio examinations assessed by an external panel.
Due to the fact that the architectural disciplines are primarily studio based (formative assessment) supported by theoretical subject assessment, the sequence of formative and summative assessments is repeated throughout the academic year. Both design and urban design projects completed during each semester are submitted to an external and internal panel of examiners in the form of a portfolio examination. An interim assessment and progress assessment is made in June, with the final summative studio practice assessment in November. The aim of the interim assessment is to provide feedback on the work completed to date and an indication of the standard of the portfolio presented. The final assessment by the external examination panel in November determines a mark which complies with the requirements of the South African Council for the Architectural Profession Accreditation Board. |
