| [Registered Qual & Unit Std Home page] [Search Qualifications] [Search Unit Standards] |
|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Advanced Occupational Diploma: Fraud Examiner |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 123002 | Advanced Occupational Diploma: Fraud Examiner | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| Development Quality Partner - FASSET | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| QCTO - Quality Council for Trades and Occupations | OQSF - Occupational Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| Advanced Occupational Dip | Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Finance, Economics and Accounting | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 255 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 07 | Regular-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Registered | EXCO 0428/24 | 2024-11-21 | 2029-11-21 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2030-11-21 | 2033-11-21 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification replaces: |
| Qual ID | Qualification Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Min Credits | Replacement Status |
| 67269 | Advanced Certificate: Fraud Examination | Level 6 | NQF Level 07 | 120 | Complete |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
The purpose of the qualification is to prepare a learner to function as a Fraud Examiner. A Fraud examiner investigates suspicious activity that may indicate fraud or fraud risk by conducting forensic audits, reviewing documents, and interviewing suspects of suspected theft, corruption, conspiracy, embezzlement, money laundering, bribery and extortion. They investigate, detect, prevent and deter financial and other information fraudulent activities. A qualified learner will be able to: The qualification can open doors to various career opportunities, including roles as fraud investigators, forensic accountants, compliance officers, or internal auditors. It enables learners to pursue opportunities in different countries and regions and access a vast network of professionals in the field of fraud examination and forensic accounting. This network provides opportunities for mentorship, collaboration, and knowledge sharing, facilitating professional growth and development. Qualified learners are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards, integrity, professionalism, credibility and trustworthiness but also prepares them to uphold ethical standards throughout their careers. A qualified learner will demonstrate the following key attributes: Rationale: The National Development Plan - 2030, states that high corruption levels frustrate society's ability to operate fairly and efficiently, and the state's ability to deliver on its development mandate and that the level of corruption increased involves both public and private sector participants. The perception of high levels of malfeasance at senior levels of government makes the fight against corruption that much harder. Learners will contribute to objectives set in the National Development Plan - 2030 in combating fraud and corruption in the public and private sectors. Learners will be able to understand and communicate the effects of fraud and/or corruption on services and will be able to introduce mechanisms to investigate and report fraud and corruption cases. The report states further that corruption must be fought on three fronts: deterrence, prevention, and education. Deterrence helps people understand that they are likely to get caught and punished. Prevention is about systems (information, audit and so on) that make it hard to engage in corrupt acts. The social dimensions of corruption need to be tackled by focusing on values, through education. The anti-corruption system requires qualified and competent fraud examiners across all organisations who are trained in sophisticated investigative techniques to ensure that cases are well investigated and presented for prosecution. The Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey states that surveys are regularly carried out to estimate the true scale and cost of fraud to business and society. Findings vary, and it is difficult to obtain a complete picture of the full extent of the fraud, but these surveys indicate that fraud is prevalent within organisations and remains a serious and costly problem. The risks of fraud may only be increasing due to growing globalisation, more competitive markets, rapid developments in technology, and periods of economic difficulty. The prevention of fraud and corrupt activities will increase the government's ability to deliver services and achieve intended outcomes. Money and services that are diverted away from those who need it, can be channelled to intended services. This qualification is intended to develop and improve capacity and expertise in the areas of fraud detection, prevention, and deterrence. This qualification will enhance sector integrity by identifying and addressing fraudulent activities within organisations. Expertise in fraud detection, prevention, and investigation helps safeguard assets, maintain trust, and protect stakeholders' interests. This qualification equips learners with specialised skills to mitigate fraud risks effectively. The knowledge of fraud schemes, internal controls, and investigative techniques enables learners to proactively identify vulnerabilities and implement measures to prevent fraud, reducing financial losses and reputational damage for organisations. This shall reduce the cost of fraud borne by society as encountered, in both the private and public sectors. The qualification will help contribute to the pursuit of justice and accountability by uncovering fraudulent behaviour, gathering evidence, and supporting legal proceedings. The efforts would help hold perpetrators accountable for their actions, deter future fraudulent activities, and uphold ethical standards within society. Fraud can have significant economic repercussions, impacting businesses, investors, and consumers. By detecting and preventing fraud, qualifying learners of this qualification can help promote economic stability by preserving assets, maintaining investor confidence, and fostering trust in financial markets. The building of capacity through this qualification can result in cost savings for organisations and the economy as a whole. By identifying and addressing fraud early on, they will help minimise financial losses, reduce litigation expenses, and prevent reputational harm, ultimately contributing to the overall efficiency and sustainability of the economy. Typical learners to the qualification are those who hold qualifications and or are employed in the following fields: This qualification meets the requirements for registration of a professional designation with the professional body. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
RPL for Access: RPL for exemption from modules: learners who have gained the stipulated competencies of the modules of a qualification through any means of formal, informal or non-formal learning and/or work experience, may be awarded credits towards relevant modules, and gaps identified for training, which is then concluded. RPL for Access to the External Integrated Summative Assessment (EISA): Upon successful completion of the EISA, RPL learners will be issued with the QCTO certificate for the qualification. Quality Partners are responsible for ensuring the RPL mechanism and process for qualifications is approved by the QCTO. Entry Requirements: |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification is made up of compulsory Knowledge, Practical Skill and Work Experience Modules:
Knowledge Modules: Total number of credits for Knowledge Modules: 100. Practical Skill Modules: Total number of credits for Practical Skill Modules: 95. Work Experience Modules: Total number of credits for Work Experience Modules: 60. |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Create and establish an anti-fraud culture to prevent and deter fraud.
2. Apply legal elements related to affixing blame as a result of fraud investigations. 3. Analyse financial transactions and fraud schemes in the occupational environment. 4. Investigate and report on fraud findings. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
ELO 1: Create and establish an anti-fraud culture to prevent and deter fraud. Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: ELO 2: Apply legal elements related to affixing blame as a result of fraud investigations. Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: ELO 3: Analyse financial transactions and fraud schemes in the occupational environment. Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4: ELO 4: Investigate and report on fraud findings. Integrated Assessment: Integrated Formative Assessment: The Skills Development Providers will use the curriculum to guide them on the stipulated internal assessment criteria and weighting. They will also apply the scope of practical skills and applied knowledge as stipulated by the internal assessment criteria. This formative assessment leads to entrance into the integrated External Summative Assessment. Integrated Summative Assessment: An External Integrated Summative Assessment, conducted through the relevant QCTO Assessment Quality Partner is required to issue this qualification. The External Integrated Summative Assessment will focus on the Exit Level Outcomes and Associated Assessment Criteria. Additional to the written assessment the learner must also submit a portfolio of evidence compiled of outcomes achieved in the workplace. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| The Advanced Occupational Diploma: Fraud Examiner was compared to Anti-corruption-related qualifications offered in Austria and Australia.
Austria The Anti-Corruption Collective Action Impact Centre (ACAIC) offers a Post-graduate Certificate in Anti-corruption and Collective Action, which is a one-year qualification, structured into modular education during the first four months and practical project planning and implementation in the remaining eight months. Modules equip learners with theoretical and practical knowledge in the areas of anti-corruption, collective action, and project management. The qualification is not pitched at a specific Framework level. Entry requirements to the qualification is an undergraduate degree, equivalent to a bachelor's degree, with a minimum of three years of relevant work experience or a proven history of academic research in areas related to anti-corruption and collective action. Modules covered by the qualification are: Similarities: Both qualifications are offered over one year, require an undergraduate qualification as an entry requirement and have a practical component as part of the qualification. Differences: The Advanced Occupational Diploma: Fraud Examiner focuses on fraud prevention and deterrence with a component in anti-corruption whereas the Post-graduate Certificate in Anti-Corruption and Collective Action focuses on anti-corruption. The Austrian qualification has no Framework level. Australia: Charles Stuart University offers a Graduate Certificate in Corruption and Integrity Management that is delivered over a year. The qualification is designed to professionalise the Integrity sector by providing learners with specialised knowledge of integrity systems and the environment in which they operate, including a theoretical and practical foundation that instils in learners best practice approaches to Corruption Prevention. The qualification has no Framework level. Entry requirements to the qualification is a degree in a relevant field or its equivalent in professional experience and qualifications are required. Examples of equivalence include police service internal affairs investigative training and/or more than three years of investigative experience; or more than three years of industry experience in an anti-corruption-related role and associated industry training within a private or public sector regulatory unit, government department or civil review agency. The qualification consists of two (2) core subjects and one elective subject. Similarities: Both qualifications require an undergraduate qualification as an entry requirement, have theoretical and practical components, and are delivered over a year. Differences: The Graduate Certificate in Corruption and Integrity Management has a subject/module on Fraud and Financial Crime whereas the majority of the modules of the Advanced Occupational Diploma: Fraud Examiner deal with fraud-related content and have Work Experience modules component. The Australian qualification has no framework level. Conclusion: Both international qualifications compare well with the Advanced Occupational Diploma: Fraud Examiner as all are delivered over a year, require an undergraduate qualification as entry requirement and have practical components. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification provides opportunities for the following articulation options.
Horizontal Articulation: Vertical Articulation: Diagonal Articulation: |
| NOTES |
| Qualifying for External Assessment:
To qualify for an external assessment, learners must provide proof of completion of all required knowledge and practical modules by means of statements of results and a record of completed work experience. Additional Legal or Physical Entry Requirements: None. Criteria for the accreditation of providers: Accreditation requirements, against which Skills Development Providers (SDP) and Assessment Centres, will be accredited, is found in the Curriculum Document, as listed below. The curriculum title and code are: Fraud Examiner: 242215-000-00-00. Encompassed Trade: None. Assessment Quality Partner (AQP): Finance and Accounting Services Sector Education and Training Authority (FASSET). |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| When qualifications are replaced, some (but not all) of their learning programmes are moved to the replacement qualifications. If a learning programme appears to be missing from here, please check the replaced qualification. |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| NONE |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |