SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Conduct moderation of outcomes-based assessments 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
115759  Conduct moderation of outcomes-based assessments 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Assessor Standards 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
ETDP SETA - Education, Training and Development Practices Sector Education and Training Authority 
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development Higher Education and Training 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  10 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 		 2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2026-06-30   2029-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard replaces: 
US ID Unit Standard Title Pre-2009 NQF Level NQF Level Credits Replacement Status
7977  Moderate Assessment  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  10   
9929  Moderate an assessment  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  12   

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
This unit standard is for people who conduct internal or external moderation of outcomes-based assessments. The assessments could be in terms of outcomes defined in a number of documents, including but not limited to unit standards, exit level outcomes, assessment standards, curriculum statements and qualifications. This unit standard will contribute towards the achievement of a variety of qualifications particularly within the field of Education Training and Development Practices and Human Resource Development.

Those who have achieved this unit standard will be able to moderate assessments in terms of the relevant outcome statements and quality assurance requirements. The candidate-moderator will be able to use the prescribed Quality Assurance procedures in a fair, valid, reliable and practicable manner that is free of all bias and discrimination, paying particular attention to the three groups targeted for redress: race, gender and disability.

In particular, people credited with this unit standard are able to:
  • Demonstrate understanding of moderation within the context of an outcomes-based assessment system,
  • Plan and prepare for moderation,
  • Conduct moderation,
  • Advise and support assessors,
  • Report, record and administer moderation, and
  • Review moderation systems and processes. 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners have previous assessment experience when starting to learn towards this unit standard, and in particular, recognition for the unit standard: NLRD 115753: "Conduct outcomes-based assessments". It is recommended that candidates should achieve NLRD 115755: "Design and develop outcomes-based assessments" before attempting this unit standard:

    It is further assumed that the person has evaluative expertise within the field in which they are moderating assessments. 

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    1. This is a generic unit standard, and applies to internal and/or external moderation within all fields of learning. It is accepted that moderation happens in different ways and at different levels in different sectors, including different models for what constitutes internal versus external moderation. This standard is intended to cover any situation in which moderation occurs, whether this be internally, i.e. within the ambit of the provider-assessor, or externally through cooperating providers, or externally through professional bodies and quality assurance bodies.

    2. Assessment of candidate-moderators will only be valid for award of this unit standard if the following requirements are met:
  • Moderation is carried out for assessments that include candidates with special needs, and RPL situations. Where real assessments are not available to cover these situations, the candidate is able to demonstrate how special needs and RPL situations would be addressed within their moderation plan and process.
  • Moderation covers assessment instruments, assessment design and methodology, assessment records; assessment decisions, reporting and feedback mechanisms.
  • Moderation is carried out for assessments involving a variety of assessment techniques, such as work samples, simulations, role-plays, written items, oral, portfolios and projects.
  • Moderation activities include pre-assessment interactions with assessors, interactions during assessments and post-assessment interactions.
  • Moderation involves at least two sets of real assessment materials for the same standards and at least six assessor decisions.
  • The assessments that are moderated are in relation to a significant, meaningful and coherent outcome statement that includes assessment criteria and allows for judgements of competence in line with SAQA's definition of competence i.e. embraces foundational, practical and reflexive dimensions of competence. This means that moderation of simple, single-task assessments will not be valid for awarding this unit standard.

    3. For the purposes of assessment against this unit standard, candidate-moderators should have access to organisational assessment and moderation policies, procedures and systems. It is assumed the organisational policies and procedures are of a quality sufficient for accreditation purposes. Where candidate-moderators are assessed in organisations that do not have a moderation system in place, assessors of moderators should provide a mock system for the purposes of the assessment.

    4. This unit standard applies to all Moderators, regardless of whether a person carries out moderation internally, as part of an organisation's quality assurance system, or externally, as part of an ETQA or other process to verify assessment results supplied by the provider or assessment agency.

    Further range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. 
    		•

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Demonstrate understanding of moderation within the context of an outcomes-based assessment system. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Moderation is explained in terms of its contribution to quality assured assessment and recognition systems within the context of principles and regulations concerning the NQF. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    A variety of moderation methods are described and compared in terms of strengths, weaknesses and applications. The descriptions show how moderation is intended to uphold the need for manageable, credible and reliable assessments. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Key principles of assessment are described in terms of their importance and effect on the assessment and the application of the assessment results. Examples are provided to show how moderation may be effective in ensuring the principles of assessment are upheld. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    See "Definition of Terms" for a definition of assessment principles.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Examples are provided to show how moderation activities could verify the fairness and appropriateness of assessment methods and activities used by assessors in different assessment situations. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Assessment situations for gathering evidence of abilities in problem solving, knowledge, understanding, practical and technical skills, personal and attitudinal skills and values.
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Plan and prepare for moderation. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    The planning and preparation is to take place within the context of an existing moderation system, whether internal or external, as well as an existing assessment plan. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Planning and preparation activities are aligned with moderation system requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The scope of the moderation is confirmed with relevant parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Parties include the assessors and moderating bodies where these exist.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Planning of the extent of moderation and methods of moderation ensures manageability of the process. Planning makes provision for sufficient moderation evidence to enable a reliable judgement to be passed on the assessments under review. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The contexts of the assessments under review are clarified with the assessors or assessment agency, and special needs are taken into consideration in the moderation planning. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Moderation methods and processes are sufficient to deal with all common forms of evidence for the assessments to be moderated, including evidence gathered for recognition of prior learning. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    The documentation is prepared in line with the moderation system requirements and in such a way as to ensure moderation decisions are clearly documented. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    Required physical and human resources are ensured to be ready and available for use. Logistical arrangements are confirmed with relevant role-players prior to the moderation. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Conduct moderation. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
  • Moderation to address the design of the assessment, activities before, during and after assessment, and assessment documentation.
  • Moderation to include assessments of candidates with special needs and for RPL cases. Where assessments do not include special needs or RPL cases, evidence for this may be produced through scenarios.
  • Evidence must be gathered for on-site and off-site moderation.
  • Evidence must be show candidate-moderators are able to moderate in situations where:
    - The moderation process confirms the assessment results, and where
    - The moderation process finds it cannot uphold the assessment results. 
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The moderation is conducted in accordance with the moderation plan. Unforeseen events are handled without compromising the validity of the moderation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The assessment instruments and process are checked and judged in terms of the extent to which the principles of good assessment are upheld. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    See "Definitions of Terms" for definitions of assessment principles.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Moderation confirms that special needs of candidates have been provided for but without compromising the requirements specified in the relevant outcome statements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The proportion of assessments selected for checking meets the quality assurance body's requirements for consistency and reliability. The use of time and resources is justified by the assessment history or record of the assessors and/or assessment agency under consideration. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    Appeals against assessment decisions are handled in accordance with organisational appeal procedures. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    The moderation decision is consistent with the quality assurance body's requirements for fairness, validity and reliability of assessments to be achieved. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    The "moderation decision" includes agreement or disagreement with the results of the assessments.
    requirements include the interpretation of assessment criteria and correct application of assessment procedures.
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Advise and support assessors. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The nature and quality of advice facilitates a common understanding of the relevant outcomes and criteria, and issues related to their assessment by assessors. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The nature and quality of advice promotes assessment in accordance with good assessment principles and enhances the development and maintenance of quality management systems in line with ETQA requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Advice on quality management systems includes planning, staffing, resourcing, training and recording systems.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Support contributes towards the further development of assessors as needed. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    All communications are conducted in accordance with relevant confidentiality requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Report, record and administer moderation. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Moderation findings are reported to designated role-players within agreed time-frames and according to the quality assurance body's requirements for format and content. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Role-players could include ETQA or Moderating Body personnel, internal or external moderators and assessors.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Records are maintained in accordance with organisational quality assurance and ETQA requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Confidentiality of information relating to candidates and assessors is preserved in accordance with organisational quality assurance and ETQA requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 
    Review moderation systems and processes. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Strengths and weaknesses of moderation systems and processes are identified in terms of their manageability and effectiveness in facilitating judgements on the quality and validity of assessment decisions. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Recommendations contribute towards the improvement of moderation systems and processes in line with ETQA requirements and overall manageability. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The review enhances the credibility and integrity of the recognition system. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • A candidate-moderator wishing to be assessed, against this unit standard may apply to an assessment agency, assessor or provider institution accredited by the relevant ETQA.
  • Anyone assessing a candidate-moderator against this unit standard must meet the assessor requirements of the relevant ETQA. In particular, such assessors of candidate-moderators must demonstrate that they assess in terms of the scope and context defined in all the range statements.
  • Any institution offering learning towards this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
  • External moderation of assessment will be conducted by the relevant ETQA at its discretion. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The following knowledge is embedded within the unit standard, and will be assessed directly or indirectly through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the assessment criteria:
  • Outcomes-based education, training and development
  • The role and function of moderation - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Moderation is explained in terms of its contribution to quality assured assessment and recognition systems within the context of principles and regulations concerning the NQF.' and indirectly assessed throughout the unit standard.
  • Moderation methods - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'A variety of moderation methods are described and compared in terms of strengths, weaknesses and applications. The descriptions show how moderation is intended to uphold the need for manageable, credible and reliable assessments.' and 'Moderation methods and processes are sufficient to deal with all common forms of evidence for the assessments to be moderated, including evidence gathered for recognition of prior learning.', and indirectly assessed through application throughout the standard.
  • Principles of assessment - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Key principles of assessment are described in terms of their importance and effect on the assessment and the application of the assessment results. Examples are provided to show how moderation may be effective in ensuring the principles of assessment are upheld.', and indirectly assessed via a requirement to judge whether the principles are applied by assessors.
  • Principles and practices of RPL - assessed in terms of the requirement for candidate moderators to moderate RPL-related assessments.
  • Methods of assessment - directly assessed through assessment criterion 'Examples are provided to show how moderation activities could verify the fairness and appropriateness of assessment methods and activities used by assessors in different assessment situations', and indirectly when checking the appropriateness and fairness of assessment methods used by assessors
  • Potential barriers to assessment - assessed when dealing with special needs.
  • The principles and mechanisms of the NQF - this knowledge underpins the standard
  • Assessment policies and ETQA requirements
  • Knowledge of quality assurance policy and procedures
  • Understanding of organisational or institutional contexts
  • Understanding the curriculum (where applicable). 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking: planning for contingencies, candidates with special needs, problems that arise during moderation, suggesting changes to moderation following review. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively in a team using critical and creative thinking: working with assessors and other relevant parties during moderation, as well as post-moderation. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organize and manage oneself and ones activities: planning, preparing, conducting and recording the moderation. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organize and critically evaluate information: gather, evaluate and judge evidence and the assessment process. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively: communicate with assessors and other relevant parties during moderation, and provide feedback. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Demonstrate the world as a set of related systems: understanding the impact of moderation assessment on individuals, organisations and the credibility of recognition through NQF systems. 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Be culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts: plan, conduct and give feedback on moderation in a culturally sensitive manner. 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    N/A 

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    This unit standard replaces unit standard 9929, "Moderate an assessment", Level 5, 12 credits.
    This unit standard replaces unit standard 7977, "Moderate assessment", Level 6, 10 credits.

    Supplementary information

    Definition of Terms

    The following terms are defined as used within this and related unit standards:
  • Assessment: - a process in which evidence is gathered and evaluated against agreed criteria in order to make a judgement of competence for developmental and/or recognition purposes.
  • Assessment activities: - what a candidate does or is involved in as a means of producing evidence e.g. designing things, making things, repairing things, reporting on something, answering questions, solving problems, demonstrating techniques.
  • Assessment criteria: - descriptions of the required type and quality of evidence against which candidates are to be assessed.
  • Assessment design: - the analysis of defined outcomes and criteria to produce a detailed description of how an assessment should take place, including all instructions and information regarding the assessment activities and assessment methods. The product of assessment design could be termed an Assessment Guide (see definition below).
  • Assessment facilitator (or evidence facilitator): - a person who works within particular contexts, under the supervision of registered assessors, to help candidates/learners gather, produce and organise evidence for assessment.
  • Assessment Guide: - this is a complete package based on a thorough analysis of specified outcomes and criteria, assessment requirements and a particular assessment context. Assessment Guides are designed primarily for use by assessors to conduct an assessment (or possibly a series of related assessments) in terms of a significant and coherent outcome of learning e.g. a unit standard. Assessment Guides address the following key aspects in detail:
    - How will the assessment take place?
    - What is needed to make the assessment happen?
    - How will evidence be gathered, recorded and judged?
    In general, Assessment Guides include descriptions of the approach to the assessment, assessment conditions, assessment activities, instructions to assessors and candidates/learners, assessment methods, assessment instruments (e.g. scenarios, role-plays, questions, tasks), resource requirements, guidance for contextualising assessments, relevant standard operating procedures, administrative procedures, moderation requirements, assessment outcomes and criteria, observations sheets, checklists, possible or required sources of evidence and guidance on expected quality of evidence including exemplars, memoranda or rubrics.
  • Assessment instruments: - those items that an assessor uses or a candidate uses as part of the assessment e.g. scenarios with questions, case studies, description of tasks to be performed, descriptions of role play situations.
  • Assessment method: - for the most part, assessment methods relate to what an assessor does to gather and evaluate evidence. Assessment methods include observing candidates, questioning candidates, interviewing supervisors/colleagues/managers of candidates, listening to candidates, reviewing written material, testing products.
  • Assessment plan: - an assessment plan is produced at provider level, and gives an overview of the timeframes and responsibilities for assessment and moderation for the agreed delivery period. The plan addresses practical implementation details, including, for example, decisions about the clustering of certain outcomes or unit standards/outcomes for integrated assessment, any planned RPL, and the relation of assessment and moderation to delivery of modules/ programmes in terms of timeframes.
  • Assessment principles: - see more detailed definitions in next section.
  • Candidate/learner: - person whose performance is being assessed by an assessor. Such people include those who may already be competent, but who seek assessment for formal recognition (candidates), as well as those who may have completed or are in the process of completing learning programmes (learners).
  • Candidate-moderator: - the person who is being assessed against this particular unit standard.
  • Evaluative expertise: - the ability to judge the quality of a performance in relation to specified criteria consistently, reliably and with insight. Evaluative expertise implies deep subject matter understanding and knowledge about the outcomes being assessed at a theoretical and practical level, but does not necessarily include practical ability in the outcome.
  • Evidence: - tangible proof produced by or about individuals, that can be perceived with the senses, bearing a direct relationship to defined outcomes and criteria, based on which judgements are made concerning the competence of individuals. Evidence includes plans, products, reports, answers to questions, testimonials, certificates, descriptions of observed performances, peer review reports.
  • Evidence facilitator: - see assessment facilitator
  • Moderation: - a process that supports and evaluates the assessment environment, process and instruments with a view to confirming the reliability and authenticity of assessment results and improving the quality of assessments and assessors.
  • Performance: - includes demonstration of skills, knowledge, understanding and attitudes, and the ability to transfer these to new situations.
  • Portfolio of evidence: - a carefully organised and complete collection of evidence compiled by candidates/learners to prove competence in relation to defined outcomes.
  • RPL - Recognition of Prior Learning means the comparison of the previous learning and experience of a learner against specified learning outcomes required for:
    - The award of credits for a specified unit standard or qualification,
    - Access to further learning,
    - Recognition in terms of meeting minimum requirements for a specific job,
    - Placement at a particular level in an organisation or institution, or
    - Advanced standing or status.
    This means that regardless of where, when or how a person obtained the required skills and knowledge, it could be recognised for credits. In this sense, RPL is an important principle of the NQF. RPL involves an assessment process of preparing for RPL, engaging with RPL candidates, gathering evidence, evaluating and judging evidence in relation to defined criteria, giving feedback and reporting results. Given that the all candidates are assessed against the same criteria, credits awarded through RPL are therefore just as valid as credits awarded through any other assessment process.
  • Outcomes-based assessment: - a planned process for gathering and judging evidence of competence, in relation to pre-determined criteria within an outcomes-based paradigm, for various purposes including further development and recognition of learning achievements.
  • Verifier: - those who operate at systems level to monitor assessment and moderation practices, trends and results.


    Principles of assessment:

    Methods of Assessment
  • Appropriate: The method of assessment is suited to the outcome being assessed i.e. is capable of gathering evidence in relation to the intended outcome, and not something else.
  • Fair: The method of assessment does not present any barriers to achievements, which are not related to the achievement of the outcome at hand.
  • Manageable: The methods used make for easily arranged, cost-effective assessments that do not unduly interfere with learning.
  • Integrated into work or learning: Evidence collection is integrated into the work or learning process where this is appropriate and feasible. (Often referred to as naturally occurring evidence).

    Evidence
  • Valid: The evidence focuses on the requirements laid down in the relevant standard and matches the evidence requirements of the outcome/s at hand under conditions that mirror the conditions of actual performance as closely as possible
  • Current: The evidence is sufficient proof that the candidate is able to perform the assessment outcomes at the time the assessor declares the candidate competent.
  • Authentic: The assessor is satisfied that the evidence is attributable to the person being assessed.
  • Sufficient: The evidence collected establishes that all criteria have been met and that performance to the required standard can be repeated consistently in the future i.e. the performance to standard is not a "once-off".

    Overall Assessment Process
  • Systematic: The overall process ensures assessment is fair, effective, repeatable and manageable.
  • Open: The process is transparent i.e. assessment candidates understand the assessment process and the criteria that apply and can contribute to the planning and accumulation of evidence.
  • Reliable/Consistent: The same assessor would make the same judgement again in similar circumstances and judgements match judgements made on similar evidence. 
    		•

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Elective  58581   National Certificate: Air Traffic Support  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  TETA 
    Elective  59201   National Certificate: Generic Management  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50334   National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  79808   National Diploma: Occupational Safety  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50333   National Diploma: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  73529   Advanced Certificate: Education: School Management and Leadership  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50330   Bachelor: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices  Level 6  NQF Level 07  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  50331   National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  ETDP SETA 
    Elective  58579   National Diploma: Air Traffic Control  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  TETA 
    Elective  58008   National Diploma: Aircraft Piloting  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2016-12-31  TETA 
    Elective  61729   National Diploma: Policing  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  SAS SETA 
    Elective  20485   National First Degree: ABET Practice  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2018-12-31  ETDP SETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    1. A5 Competence Evolution 
    2. ABASUNGULI TRAINING SPESIALISTS (PTY) LTD 
    3. Abinet Training and Development 
    4. ABM COLLEGE SA (PTY) LTD 
    5. ACADEMY OF PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD 
    6. Academy of Personal Mastery 
    7. Academy Training Group 
    8. Accreditation & Training Services 
    9. Advantage Training Services cc 
    10. Affari Consultants cc 
    11. AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD 
    12. African Learing and Development Academy for Adults ALDAA 
    13. African Learning & Development Academy (Pty) Ltd (ALDA) 
    14. African Training and Management Consultants 
    15. Afrika Tikkun NCC 
    16. Akhule Development Institute cc 
    17. Aldabri 106 Institute for Quality (Pty) Ltd 
    18. Alona Institute of Leadership 
    19. Amaqamu Project Management and Consulting 
    20. Amsi and associates cc 
    21. Amyoli Consulting 
    22. Annacol Training Consultants 
    23. AQUARIUS SKILLS SOLUTION 
    24. Arsa Holdings Training And Services Pty Ltd 
    25. ASORIP NPC 
    26. Aspirations communication Training cc T/A Creative Minds Randburg 
    27. Assessment and Entrepreneurship Centre 
    28. ASSESSMENT COLLEGE OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD 
    29. ATE Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    30. ATTE - The Training Edge 
    31. Aubrey Nyiko Business Enterprise cc 
    32. Axolemahle Business Enterprise 
    33. Ayoba Training Institute (Pty)Ltd 
    34. Azanian Community Development Pty Ltd 
    35. B T Group of Companies Pty Ltd 
    36. Bakho Skills Development 
    37. Basadi Africa Management 
    38. Bensen Business Consulting And Training Pty Ltd 
    39. BEPE Developments 
    40. Boeenelo S Trading And Project Pty Ltd 
    41. Bohlali Provider Support 
    42. Boitjhorisong Institutions Services Networks 
    43. Bokamoso Global Solutions 
    44. BOLAND COLLEGE 
    45. Bonang Training & Development 
    46. Bondiswa Investments cc 
    47. BORDERGATE EVENTS MANAGEMENT AND PROJECTS 
    48. Boston City Campus (Pty) Ltd formerly Boston City Campus and Business College (Pty) Ltd 
    49. Brain Boosters Business Education (PTY) LTD 
    50. Braingro 
    51. Brainwave Projects 1997 CC 
    52. Breakeven 59(PTY) Ltd 
    53. Buchule HR & Events Management Services 
    54. Bull's Business and Skills Training Institute 
    55. Business Development Unit (PTY)Ltd 
    56. Business Intelligence Trading 48 (PTY) LTD 
    57. Cale Developments 
    58. Charnash Enterprise Solutions Pty Ltd 
    59. Chithi Holdings 
    60. Colleen Osorio Skills Development Consultancy cc 
    61. College of Cape Town - Athlone Campus 
    62. Compass Academy of Learning 
    63. Competency Alignment Forum (C.A.F) t/a Tlhatlogo Educational Services 
    64. Competitive Edge Training & Consulting 
    65. CONTEXTUAL ASSESSMENT INSTITUTE 
    66. CORE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL 
    67. Corporate Safety Training Academy PTY Ltd 
    68. CTU Training Solutions 
    69. CUMAX 193 
    70. Curoplex PTY LTD 
    71. Cutting Edge Training Solution Learning Resources 
    72. D M Management and Consulting 
    73. Dabulamanzi & Njabulo Ndaba Consulting cc 
    74. Daleseb Business Enterprise 
    75. Damelin 
    76. Dee s Training PTY LTD 
    77. Deon de Lange t/a TDC 
    78. Designa Qualifications Pty Ltd 
    79. Diligence Defined Projects PTY Ltd t/a Deligence Defined 
    80. Directflo 
    81. Distictions Pathways Pty Ltd 
    82. Ditlou Sons And Daughters Pty Ltd 
    83. Divine Inspiration Trading 704 PTY Ltd 
    84. Dolphin Avenue Enterprises Pty Ltd 
    85. Dotcentre Business Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    86. Driving Instincts cc 
    87. DRM Skills Academy 
    88. Dru A Professional Further Education and Training College DAPFETC PT 
    89. Eagles Wings Skills Development Consultants 
    90. Ecclesiatic Trading Enterprise 
    91. EDEN ISLAND TRADING 632 CC 
    92. Eden Training Academy 
    93. Edu-Build Institute 
    94. Edu-Prof Training Centre 
    95. EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION INC 
    96. Education and Training Unit 
    97. EDUTEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD 
    98. ELIMA CONSULTING 
    99. Elite Esthetics 
    100. Emergence Learning Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    101. Empirical Training Agency (PTY) Ltd 
    102. Employ and Empower Deaf (Pty) Ltd 
    103. Employmax 
    104. Emtonjeni Wolwazi 
    105. Enjo Consultants (Pty) Ltd 
    106. Enskills Training and Consulting 
    107. Environment and Language Education Trust 
    108. Equipt Training and Development cc 
    109. Esteem Solutions CC 
    110. Evening Flame Trading 
    111. Faranang Business and Training Solutions PTY(LTD) 
    112. Five Star Medical Services cc 
    113. Five Training Skills Pty Ltd 
    114. Follow the Star 508 cc 
    115. Friendly Ties Management 
    116. Full Circle Advisory Services (Pty) Ltd 
    117. FURNITURE WORLD TRAINING CENTRE 
    118. Future Performance Training and Development 
    119. Future-Teacher (Pty) Ltd 
    120. G & K Gray Training cc 
    121. G and K Module Developers 
    122. G CUBE COMMUNICATIONS CC 
    123. Gateway City College 
    124. Gert Sibande Public FET College - Central Office 
    125. Giver of Givers Foundation Organisation 
    126. Go Factory Training Academy 
    127. Goldfields TVET College 
    128. Gotsec Skills Training 
    129. Grow Training Institute 
    130. Gugulungi Pty Ltd 
    131. Guru Group of Learning (Pty) Ltd 
    132. Halcyspace PTY LTD 
    133. Haras Blu Consulting 
    134. HDPSA 
    135. Headspace Consulting (PTY) Ltd 
    136. HEART Solutions 
    137. Hlengana Sibiya Training and Associates cc 
    138. HLOSI SECURITY SOLUTIONS 
    139. Holofelang Business Enterprises cc 
    140. Howtotender 
    141. HRD Performance Consultants 
    142. HRD Training & Consulting 
    143. ICM t/a Institute for Career Management 
    144. IEB Assessment Education and Training (Pty) Ltd 
    145. Ifalezwe Learning Express 
    146. Igugu Training and Investments 
    147. Ikage Sd College Pty Ltd 
    148. Ikage Skills Development cc 
    149. Ikamva Projects Pty Ltd 
    150. Ikhono Funda Training 
    151. Ikhowe Staffing Solutions cc 
    152. Ilearn Corporate Services Pty Ltd 
    153. Imbalenhle Learning Academy 
    154. Inclusion support services 
    155. Indlela Department of Labour 
    156. Infomage Pty Ltd 
    157. INHLANSI CONSULTANTS CC 
    158. Inkwazi Learning Network 
    159. INKWENKWEZI PRIVATE COLLEGE - SKILLS DEVELOPMENT cc 
    160. Interserv Training Solution Pty Ltd 
    161. Intertrain Consulting 
    162. Isamon Vocational College of Excellence Pty Ltd 
    163. Isibani Skills Academy 
    164. Isibani Soluntu Development Trust 
    165. Itireleng Bokamoso Trading Development Services and Associates 
    166. IYAM Investments (Pty) Ltd 
    167. Izinkanyezi Training and Development Pty Ltd 
    168. J and N Ikwekwezi Yokusa Development Training 
    169. Jabulani Training & Development 
    170. JIKA ST ANDREW'S LANGUAGE PROJECT (PTY) LTD 
    171. Karabo Info Centre and Trading 
    172. Karlyn Skills Training 
    173. Katiso-kuno Consulting 
    174. KDS Centre for Skills Development and Training Pty Ltd 
    175. Keetileafrika Training Institute 
    176. Ken Mathews & AssociatesTraining Counsultants cc. 
    177. Kgaka Kgolo Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    178. Kgang-Kgolo Consulting 
    179. Khaas Training Academy 
    180. Khoali Group of Companies (Pty) Ltd 
    181. Kitso Bokamoso Training Solution 
    182. KITSO TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 
    183. Klein Karoo Resource Centre 
    184. Leadprotec 
    185. Learn Ability and Training Development t/a LearnAbility 
    186. Learnership Support Systems (Pty) Ltd 
    187. Learning Performance Link 
    188. Lebzatainment Foundation NPC 
    189. Legacy New Vision Management and Marketing Con 
    190. Lehlabile Emergency Institute 
    191. LEMBETSI BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 
    192. Leronsa Trading Enterprise 
    193. Letlotlo Foundation 
    194. LICENCE WISE TRAINING SPECIALISTS 
    195. Life Long ABET Consulting 
    196. Linder General Trading Pty Ltd 
    197. Lionsden Africa Business Solutions Pty Ltd 
    198. Loago Business Consulting 
    199. LONA ULWAZI CONSULTANTS CC 
    200. M & M Training and Construction 
    201. M P van Rooy Training Consultant 
    202. M3i Skills Development 
    203. Mabidi Funzani Trading And Projects Pty Ltd 
    204. MACCAUVLEI LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD 
    205. Maite Business Consulting and Training Agency Pty Ltd 
    206. Malope A Phahla Security Services Pty Ltd 
    207. Marematlou Training Institute 
    208. Masakhane Training and Consultant Pty Ltd 
    209. MASHUSHE ETDP TRADING AND PROJECTS 
    210. Masimong Resource Solutions 
    211. Matimba Management and Labour cc 
    212. Mawethu Training 
    213. Mentor Me Corporate Foundation 
    214. MENTORNET (PTY) LTD 
    215. Metro Minds 
    216. MI Learning & Development Consultancy 
    217. Mia Secret Professional Nail System Pty Ltd 
    218. MIET Africa 
    219. Millenials Holdings 
    220. Mine Safety Training Academy 
    221. Mnambithi FET College - Central Office 
    222. MOKO SECURITY SERVICES 
    223. Mondo Skills and services providers 
    224. Montague Education and Training (PTY)Ltd 
    225. Montshai Skills Development and Consultants 
    226. Mosihle Pty Ltd 
    227. Mpondo Zengwenya Trading 
    228. Mthimkhulu Training and Development Institute (PTY) LTD 
    229. Mtk Corporation Solutions 
    230. Multi Dimentional 
    231. MVIMBI BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 
    232. MWG Logistical Services 
    233. Mzayifane Trading 6 
    234. Ndzalama Training 
    235. Nelson Mandela University 
    236. Neolebongi Trading Enterprise 
    237. Nero Training Consultants cc 
    238. Netgrow Training Solutions 
    239. Networx for Career Development 
    240. Networx Training Foundation 
    241. Next Step Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    242. Nkotlo Kay Tshimole Corporate Solutions Pty Ltd 
    243. Nomagwanishe Investments cc 
    244. Nompumelelo Institute of Leadership 
    245. Northlink College 
    246. Northshore Trading 19CC t/a Makakhaunye Training and Development Agency 
    247. Ntevho-Ketso Training and Recruitement Consultancy cc 
    248. Ntho Ntho Spares Suppliers Pty Ltd 
    249. NTI College 
    250. Ntsangalala Business Enterprise 
    251. Ntshingila Group Pty Ltd 
    252. Nyelati Trading Enterprise 
    253. OMNI HR CONSULTING PTY LTD 
    254. Opehst Trading 
    255. OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT 
    256. Open Learning Group 
    257. Oreahile Consulting Services 
    258. Pachi Global Foundation 
    259. Pam's Educational Consultancy 
    260. Paradise Skills Development 
    261. Pass It On Training Centre NPO 
    262. PC Educational Holdings Pty Ltd 
    263. Peritum Agri Institute Pty LTD 
    264. Petra institute of Development (PTY) Ltd 
    265. PHALANE SAFETY CONSULTANT AND TRAINING PROVIDERS PTY LTD 
    266. Phezulu Academy 
    267. Pineridge Training Centre 
    268. Pitt Institute T/A Imithombo Institute 
    269. Platinum Peak Consulting 
    270. PMA Holding (Pty) Ltd 
    271. PMADS Holdings (PTY) Ltd 
    272. PND Academy of Learning cc 
    273. Polly Maths Sci (Pty) Ltd 
    274. Precision Skills Development Training (Pty) Ltd 
    275. PRO-ACTIVE PUBLIC SERVICES COLLEGE/PTY/LTD 
    276. Prodev Education Quality Solutions 
    277. Professional Development and Training Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    278. Proffecto Consulting 
    279. Project Literacy 
    280. Proserv International 
    281. Public Sector Accountancy and Audit Academy Pty Ltd 
    282. Punchline Education And Training 
    283. QED Quality Executive Development 
    284. QED-Quality Executive Development 
    285. Qingq'ume Training and Consulting cc 
    286. QPD CONSULTANTS 
    287. Realeboga Development Services 
    288. Regenesys Management (Pty) Ltd 
    289. Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd t/a Regent Business School 
    290. Resonance Institute of Learning 
    291. Retshetse Training Project 
    292. Revo Quest Consulting 
    293. RIO RIDGE 7 (PTY)LTD 
    294. ROTO CONSULTANTS PTY LTD 
    295. S A Skills Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    296. Saint Colonel Graduate Institute (PTY) Ltd 
    297. SANDA SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 
    298. SANDF COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 
    299. SANTS College 
    300. School of Rail: Esselenpark 
    301. SEJ Skills Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    302. SEOPOSENGOE TRAINING CONSULTANCY CC 
    303. Seshego Risk Management Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    304. Sigodi Development Services and Associates (SDS) cc 
    305. Sinengomso Training Development Centre Pty Ltd 
    306. Sirius Training 
    307. Sisazi Consulting 
    308. Siyabonga Consulting Pty Ltd 
    309. Siyahluma Education Institute 
    310. Siyazama Professional Management Services t/a Siyazama 
    311. SKILLS DYNAMICS AFRICA PTY LTD 
    312. Skillsversity 
    313. SKU Training and Assessment 
    314. South Cape Public FET College - George Campus 
    315. South West Gauteng Tvet College 
    316. Southern African Institute of Learning (SAIL) 
    317. Sozim Trading and Consultancy 
    318. SPS Consulting (Pty) Ltd 
    319. SSG Training Academy Pty Ltd 
    320. STA Performance International 
    321. STC Skills Consortium/NASCO 
    322. SWAN SUPPORT SERVICES CC 
    323. Synergistic Covenant Network NPO 
    324. T Mabuya & Associates (Pty) Ltd 
    325. Takatso Educare Training and Development Services 
    326. Targeted School Development Services 
    327. TDM Management Consulting Pty Ltd 
    328. TEAM CONSULTANTS CC 
    329. Technical Support Lab 
    330. Tekollo Trading (Pty) Ltd 
    331. Tembe Service Providers 
    332. Thabelanang t/a Thabelanang Trading Enterprise 
    333. Thasha Training and Consulting 
    334. The Brokers Learning Centre 
    335. The East London Institute for Leadership Advancement & Development 
    336. The Finishing College (Pty) Lt 
    337. The Fundamentals Training Centre 
    338. THE GMC GROUP PTY LTD 
    339. The Institute of People Development 
    340. The Iscariota Group (Pty) Ltd 
    341. The Link Assessment Moderation and Skills Centre (PTY)Ltd 
    342. THE MATTHEW GONIWE SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE 
    343. THE SKILLS COLLEGE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING(PTY) LTD 
    344. THE SKILLS FACTOR 
    345. The Skills Launchpad 
    346. The Star Factory 
    347. Third Wave Human Development Enterproses (Pty) Ltd 
    348. Thobologo Training and Education Group (Pty) Ltd 
    349. THRIVE LEARNING FACILITATION CC 
    350. THT Hospitality Training 
    351. Thuto Teach NPC 
    352. Thuto-Botshabelo Training and Projects (Pty) Ltd 
    353. TLHARIHANI TRAINING CENTRE (PTY) LTD 
    354. TLN HUMAN PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS (PTY) LTD 
    355. Tlotlangthuto Training and Consulting cc 
    356. Totally Tailored Solutions Pty Ltd 
    357. TPLR and Training Services (PTY) LTD 
    358. Train 2 Teach (PTY) Ltd 
    359. Training Answers 
    360. Training Consultant and SD College 
    361. Training Unlimited Corporate Solutions 
    362. Trainyoucan (Pty) Ltd 
    363. Trojan Training Solutions 
    364. TSHIROLOGO DISABILITY TRAINING SERVICES PTY TLD 
    365. Tshwane South College for (ECD Academy) 
    366. TSWELOPELE TRAINING GROUP 
    367. Tununu Trading cc 
    368. Twilight Lehlabile Construction Pty Ltd 
    369. Tyme Training and Development 
    370. Ultraskills Pty Ltd 
    371. Ulwazi Five Tees Trading Enterprise Pty Ltd 
    372. Ulwazi Research & Training Centre 
    373. Ulwazi Training & Development 
    374. UMO LEARNING SUPPORT SYSTEM 
    375. Umzansi Educational Programs Centre 
    376. Ungaphelamandla Consultancy Private College (PTY) LTD 
    377. Universal Knowledge Software 
    378. University of Johannesburg 
    379. Ursivox Pty Ltd 
    380. Vaiti Staffing and Training Solutions cc 
    381. VERYCOOLIDEAS 
    382. VH Consulting 
    383. Vicresco (Pty) Ltd 
    384. Vutivi Training and Skills Development 
    385. VUTLHARI BYA DZONGA CONSULTANTS (PTY) LTD 
    386. VUWA PROJECTS 
    387. Whizz Skills Training and Development 
    388. Wildlife and Enviroment Society of South Africa 
    389. Willshir Trading Pty Ltd 
    390. Winston Academy 
    391. WonderKids Academy 
    392. Workers Knowledge Centre Pty Ltd 
    393. World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd 
    394. Xcite Skills Development cc 
    395. Yellow Media Learning Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    396. Zabathwa Training 
    397. Zisukumele Training Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    398. Zizzy Printing and Projects 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.