All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Write computer numerical controlled (CNC) programmes for CNC machining centres using proprietary software |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
13333 | Write computer numerical controlled (CNC) programmes for CNC machining centres using proprietary software | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 30 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of engineering machining.
Qualifying learners are able to write programmes for a three or more axis CNC machining centre using proprietary computer software. This includes writing programmes for operations such as the machining of complex surfaces and may use sub routines. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression.
The credits allocated to this unit standard assume that a learners has already learned to: |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The CNC programmes written may apply to a variety of machines and processes.
Problems of a technical nature are resolved in consultation with technical advisors. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Prepare to write programme. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
CNC programming must include writing for operations such as the machining of complex surfaces and may use sub routines. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Programme is produced in required format for machine operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications
2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Programme complies with job specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Sample components meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Write programme. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Programme is produced in required format for machine operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Programme complies with job specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Sample components meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Verify programme. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Programme is produced in required format for machine operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Programme complies with job specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Sample components meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Recognise and report problems and changes while programming. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Programme is produced in required format for machine operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Programme complies with job specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Sample components meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Record information on work done. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Document process and conformance of component to specifications |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Programme is produced in required format for machine operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Programme complies with job specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Sample components meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Tools selected meet materials, geometry of work piece and job specifications 2. Machining parameters satisfy the requirements of the proprietary software 3. Modifications to programme where required ensure compliance with job specifications 4. Components are measured and conformance to specification documented 5. Problems are reported timeously to appropriate personnel Understanding confirmed: Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
My assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assuror who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. My assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
I can be assessed in the language of my choice although if I have to report incidents or conditions to someone else, I will be assessed on my ability to report in the language commonly used in my working environment. I will be assessed in the workplace but I can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. I can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names & functions of:
Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties: Purpose of: Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: Procedures and techniques: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: Theory: rules, principles, laws: Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 58025 | National Certificate: CNC Production Machining | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 23256 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Fitting and Machining | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-10-22 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 23281 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Tooling Manufacture | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-10-22 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 22773 | National Certificate: Mechatronics | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2011-02-16 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |