All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Programme, use and maintain an industrial robot system |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
243070 | Programme, use and maintain an industrial robot system | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Welding | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Engineering and Related Design | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard replaces: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
13140 | Programme, use and maintain an industrial robot system | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 10 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of mechatronics. The learning outcomes in this unit standard also contribute to the Exit Level Outcomes required for the Mechatronics NQF Level 4 qualification.
Qualifying learners can operate and programme tools for an industrial robot system. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed to be as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for activities at and above this level. The credits assigned to it are based on the assumption that the learner is learning what is needed for this unit standard as part of his/her learning for a range of related unit standards at this level. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope and level of this unit standard is determined by the ranges as indicated under the specific outcomes.
The learner should be able to work autonomously and as part of a self-directed work team. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to apply the relevant robot safety. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Safety includes hard safety, software safety, electrical safety. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Identify and explain the function of the various parts of an industrial robot. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Robot parts include the manipulator, controller, handheld teach pendant, software. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to use the handheld teach pendant. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Understanding and use includes calibration (mastery) of the manipulator, teach tool centre points, use the various menus, fixed tool, moving tool. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to maintain the manipulator. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Maintenance includes adjustment of toothed belts, greasing of points, oil change, checking torque. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Remove and install in-line wrist, toothed belts and motor units. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Use appropriate tools and lifting equipment. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Installation process includes meshing, shafts, torque adjustment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Programme the industrial robot using simple motion programmes. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Simple motion programmes include point-to-point, linear, circular motion commands, comments, logic commands, velocity, acceleration, technology commands (tools), touch up of existing programmes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Run and test industrial robot motion programmes. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Running and testing includes in teach mode, program mode, automatic and external automatic. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Record information on work done. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Hand held teach pendant used correctly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Parts of an industrial robot system correctly identified and functions explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Motion programmes programmed to specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Touch ups to existing programmes meet specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Programmes run and tested in all modes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
Understanding confirmed: > The principles of closed loop control. > Industrial robot safety. > Function of robot systems. > Reasons for co-ordination systems. > Reasons for Point-to-point programming. > Interface between man and robot. > Tool Centre point. > Manipulator calibration. > Tool calibration. Discuss the implications of not adhering to the sequence of activities and operations as described in the specific outcomes and making decisions inappropriate to the task. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
> The manipulator. > The controller. > The software. > The robot safety components. > Handheld teach pendant. > The motor units. > The toothed belts and gears. > The cables and connectors. > Lubrication. > Point-to-point programming. > Calibration of manipulator. > Tool Centre Point. > Comments. > Degrees of freedom. > Use of sight to read error messages on liquid crystal display. > Industrial robot system. > Robot safety. > Touching up existing motion programme. > The manipulator. > The controller. > Handheld teach pendent. > Point-to-point programming. > Causes of damage and injury. > Implications of not testing the program in test mode. > implication of alpha five problem not being observed. > Program testing procedures. > Applicable safety, health and environmental protection legislation and standards. > Principles of closed loop control systems. > Principles of electricity. > Relationship between industrial robot systems and electricity. > Relationship between industrial robot systems and manufacturing. > Relationship between industrial robot systems and information technology. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities:
Organise and manage myself and my activities: |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard replaces unit standard 13140, "Programme, use and maintain an industrial robot system", Level 4, 10 credits. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 67649 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Mechatronics | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 57887 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Welding Application and Practice | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |