All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Plan learning events |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
9950 | Plan learning events | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Development | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Higher Education and Training | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2003-12-03 | 2006-08-31 | SAQA 1351/03 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2007-08-31 | 2010-08-31 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
123394 | Develop outcomes-based learning programmes | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A practitioner who has achieved this unit standard will be competent to develop, evaluate and record a plan for a learning event in relation to previous learning events.
This competence complements other ETD competences and lays the basis for further development of design/planning skills. It contributes toward the development of a professional community of ETD practitioners who rigorously plan and evaluate their education and training practices to ensure that they meet the needs of learners, society and the economy. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Practitioners applying to enter a learning programme for this ETD standard - or applying to be assessed against this ETD standard - are assumed to have a qualification or equivalent competence in an occupation in which they will practice this ETD competence.
This standard describes the ETD competence, which will be needed for them to plan learning events within their occupational competence. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The following statements provide a general guide to the scope and complexity of the competence expected of a practitioner:
1. Practitioners are required to demonstrate that they can perform the specific outcomes with understanding and reflexivity. However, at this level they will be consciously following a set of "rules" or principles, which inform what they do, rather than performing "internalised rules". 2. The practitioner is required to demonstrate the competence described in this standard in the context of skills development courses. 3. The specific outcomes should be performed in line with an established methodology for planning learning events. At this level the practitioner should be able to describe one alternative methodology; to explain how their performance would differ if they used them and to justify their choice of methodology. 4. At this level, practitioners are not expected to draw on or integrate insights from beyond their occupational and ETD competences. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Decide on the content of the learning event. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Decide on the content of the learning event by, e. g.,
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Formulate the outcomes to be achieved in the learning event. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Formulate the outcomes to be achieved in the learning event e. g.
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Develop a series of activities. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Develop a series of activities which, e. g.,
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Create, select and adapt learner support materials or equipment for each activity. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Create, select and adapt learner support materials or equipment for each activity which, e. g.,
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Revise the activities if necessary. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Develop or adapt assessment activities. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Develop or adapt assessment activities e. g.
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Evaluate the learning event plan and materials. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Evaluate the learning event plan and materials by, e. g.,
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Record the learning event plan. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Record the learning event plan in ways which, e. g.,
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
See Notes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The assessment of practitioners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; portfolios and observations; etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledge's are assessed. 1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. 2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied. 3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent. 4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 5. Performance of the specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of learners and not unfairly discriminate against any learners. Practitioners should also be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 6. As occupation-directed ETD practice is intended to contribute to the goals outlined in the skills plans of the workplace, enterprise or sector, practitioners should explain how their performance does this. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
1. Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard or will assess this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. 3. Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. Therefore anyone wishing to be assessed against this unit standard may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Practitioners should be able to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of:
1. How to conduct a needs analysis with learners. - Through analysing learners` work - Through interviewing learners as individuals or groups 2. How to identify and select available resources that fit the purpose of the learning event. 3. Relevant national standards and how to analyse these 4. Ways of formulating learning outcomes for courses and individual learning events. 5. A methodology for educating, training or developing learners. 6. Principles, procedures and formats for developing learning event 7. Available learner support materials (print, audio-visual, equipment, machinery, electronic must include workplace context.) 8. Available education or training technologies for educating or training learners in the occupational field - Face-to-face interaction - Print media - Audio-visual equipment - Computer-assisted learning/information technology - Simulators or actual workplace equipment - Satellite technologies. 9. Ways of developing and using assessment activities during a learning event 10. How to evaluate a learning event through 11. Ways of filing or storing the plan and evaluation to enable 12. Outcomes-based forms of planning learning events which are consistent with the Aims and objectives of the National Qualifications Framework and Skills Development Strategy. 13. Forms of practice, which promote the values described in the Bill of Rights and the principles underpinning the Employment Equity Act. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems by, e. g.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself, e. g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information e. g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively by, e. g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology by, e. g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 123394, which is "Develop outcomes-based learning programmes", Level 5, 10 credits.
VALUES The ETD practice outlined in this unit standard should promote the values of affirmation and non-discrimination as described in the Bill of Rights and Employment Equity Act. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 13739 | Certificate in Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 58396 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Community Development: HIV/AIDS Support | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2009-11-07 | Was HW SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 48665 | National Certificate: Community Development: HIV/AIDS support | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2006-11-07 | Was HW SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 48915 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Manufacturing and Assembly Operations Supervision | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 24194 | National Certificate: Construction Material Manufacturing | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CETA |
Elective | 20893 | National Certificate: Human Resources Management and Practices Support | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2005-02-13 | Was SABPP until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 22902 | National Diploma: Environmental Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 49023 | National Diploma: Liaison Interpreting | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | QCTO |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ACADEMY OF PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD |
2. | Bonang Training & Development |
3. | Business Development Unit (PTY)Ltd |
4. | CORE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL |
5. | DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTRE NPC |
6. | EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION INC |
7. | Guru Group of Learning (Pty) Ltd |
8. | KITSO TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT |
9. | Learning Performance Link |
10. | M P van Rooy Training Consultant |
11. | MACCAUVLEI LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
12. | MENTORNET (PTY) LTD |
13. | Read Educational Trust |
14. | Resonance Institute of Learning |
15. | SANDF COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY |
16. | SKU Training and Assessment |
17. | South Cape Public FET College - George Campus |
18. | Tshwane Leadership & Management Academy/Tshwane Metro Police |
19. | Ulwazi Training & Development |
20. | Umzansi Educational Programs Centre |
21. | World Wide Education Providers(Pty)Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |