SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Analyse and construct narrative texts 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
115912  Analyse and construct narrative texts 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Christian Theology and Ministry 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies Religious and Ethical Foundations of Society 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 6  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6  12 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 
2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30   2027-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
This Unit Standard will be useful to people who wish to further their understanding of how stories are constructed and their skills in writing stories, using biblical and other passages as a basis.

People credited with this unit standard are able to
  • Describe the differences between reader-centred, author-centred and text-centred methods of analysis
  • Describe and analyse how narrative passages are constructed
  • Describe and analyse the characters in narrative passages
  • Describe and analyse the setting of narrative passages
  • Write narratives 

  • LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners have already achieved the outcomes of the unit standard:
    Interpret biblical and other sources in their context. 

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    The following scope and context applies to the whole unit standard:
  • Narrative texts selected from both biblical and extra-biblical sources
  • Methods of narrative include both ancient and modern techniques
  • Methods of analysis of narrative passages include those used in modern 'secular' plays and art forms

    Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. 

  • Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Describe the differences between 'reader-centred', 'author-centred' and 'text-centred' analysis. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    Describe the differences between 'reader-centred', 'author-centred' and 'text-centred' analysis of texts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The description includes an account of the historical shifts between reader-centred, author-centred and text-centred analyses 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    To cover at least the shifts in scholarship since 1975
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The description includes the advantages and disadvantages of each type of analysis 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The description shows how the methods might be used in combination 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The description shows the differences between actual and implied authors and readers 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Analyse how narrative passages are constructed. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    At least four texts from the Old and New Testaments. May also include extra-biblical and/or modern narrative texts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The analysis shows where and why the narrative begins and ends 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The analysis shows how the plot is constructed 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    A clear sequence of events: preferably in a classical scheme such as 'initial situation - complication -transforming action - denouement - final situation'
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Describe and analyse the characters in narrative passages. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    At least four texts from the Old and New Testaments. May also include extra-biblical and/or modern narrative texts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The description shows how the narrator constructed the characters 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    To include 'round' and 'flat' characters; development and/or transformation of characters.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Links are made between characters and plot 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    To include a description of how the characters serve the plot.
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The description analyses the hierarchy of characters if a hierarchy is present 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The description shows were there are internal and/or external views ('focalisations') of the characters 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    The description shows what feelings the narrative arouses towards the characters 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    To include empathy, sympathy and antipathy
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Describe and analyse the setting of narrative passages. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Include temporal, social and geographic settings. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The description shows the significance of the setting for the narrative 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The description shows how the settings change in the course of the narrative and how that contributes towards the narrative 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Include variations in the pace of the changes of the settings in the story, with pauses and 'jumps'
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The description includes the changes within the characters as well as those of the settings 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE 
    Include the distances between the characters in the settings
     

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Write narratives using the learnings of specific outcomes 1 - 4. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    At least two stories to be written. Depending on the context and the resources available, the learner may be able to tell the stories that have been written. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The plot of the narratives show a clear development, in stages 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    The characters in the narratives are 'real' - showing movement, change and development 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    The changes in the characters are shown to contribute towards the plot of the narratives 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
    Providers of learning towards this unit standard will need to meet the accreditation requirements of the relevant ETQA.

    Moderation Option:

    The moderation requirements of the relevant ETQA must be met in order to award credit to learners for this unit standard. 

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The following essential embedded knowledge will be assessed through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the stipulated assessment criteria. Candidates are unlikely to achieve all the specific outcomes, to the standards described in the assessment criteria, without knowledge of the listed embedded knowledge. This means that for the most part, the possession or lack of the knowledge can be directly inferred from the quality of the candidate's performance. Where direct assessment of knowledge is required, assessment criteria have been included in the body of the unit standard.
  • Knowledge of modern methods of narrative criticism
  • Knowledge of the narrative techniques used in the Bible and other ancient literature
  • Knowledge of modern narrative techniques 

  • UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems: by the ability to construct and tell stories which can motivate people to transform situations (from 'initial' to 'final' situations) 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively with others and in teams: ideally providers will encourage learners to work together in constructing and telling stories 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively: through the discipline of study and analysis 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information: through the discovery of scholarly resources, old and modern, in the field of story-telling 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills: through learning how to analyse, construct and tell stories 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE 
    Use science and technology effectively and critically: learners may be able to incorporate visual aids such as videos or audio techniques in their story-writing 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Understand the world as a set of inter-related parts of a system: stories are an ideal way to express the linkages that are in the world 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Contribute to the full development of oneself: by discovering the power of creating reality through the writing of stories 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    Assessors should keep the following general principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:
  • Focus the assessment activities on gathering evidence in terms of the main outcome expressed in the title to ensure assessment is integrated rather than fragmented. Remember we want to declare the person competent in terms of the title. Where assessment at title level is unmanageable, then focus assessment around each specific outcome, or groups of specific outcomes.
  • Make sure evidence is gathered across the entire range, wherever it applies. Assessment activities should be as close to the real performance as possible, and where simulations or role-plays are used, there should be supporting evidence to show the candidate is able to perform in the real situation.
  • Do not focus the assessment activities on each assessment criterion. Rather make sure the assessment activities focus on outcomes and are sufficient to enable evidence to be gathered around all the assessment criteria.
  • The assessment criteria provide the specifications against which assessment judgements should be made. In most cases, knowledge can be inferred from the quality of the performances, but other cases, knowledge and understanding will have to be tested through questioning techniques. Where this is required, there will be assessment criteria to specify the standard required.
  • The task of the assessor is to gather sufficient evidence, of the prescribed type and quality, as specified in this unit standard, that the candidate can achieve the outcomes again and again and again. This means assessors will have to judge how many repeat performances are required before they believe the performance is reproducible.
  • All assessments should be conducted in line with the following well documented principles of assessment: appropriateness, fairness, manageability, integration into work or learning, validity, direct, authentic, sufficient, systematic, open and consistent. 

  • REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    Definition of Terms:

    Terms have been clarified as far as possible through the use of range statements. Further clarification of terms is provided as follows:
  • Narrative criticism: a reading and analysis of a story which brings out the meanings of the arrangement of the narrative
  • Reader-centred analysis: analytical method which approaches the text from the point of view of the reader. It assumes that the reader makes most, if not all, of the meaning of the text
  • Author-centred analysis: approaches the text from the point of view of the author. It assumes broadly that there is at least a core of objective meaning in the text.
  • Text-centred analysis: approaches the text with as few presuppositions as possible. It assumes that readers are able to be aware of their presuppositions and, to a degree, be free of them
  • Actual author: the real, historical person or persons who wrote the story
  • Implied author: the image of the author as revealed in the narrative by its choices of plot, characters and setting. For example, the implied author of Matthew's gospel is usually seen as a Jewish convert to Christianity
  • Actual reader: either the person or persons for whom the actual author intended the text, or simply anyone engaged in the act of reading
  • Implied reader: the recipient of the text as envisaged by the implied author. The implied author is seen by the critic as able to find certain meanings in the text. For example, Matthew's gospel is usually analysed on the assumption that it was meant for Jewish people who converted to Christianity
  • Plot: systematised series of events which make up the story
  • Complication: an element in the plot which moves the plot from the initial situation and invariably introduces tension
  • Transforming action: the movement in the story which removes or at least lessens the complication. It is classically the turning point of the narrative
  • Denouement: describes the effect of the transforming action and sets the stage for the final situation to be described
  • Round character: a character who has several traits and who usually plays a major role in the story, as contrasted to a -
  • Flat character: who has only a single trait and usually play a minor role in the story. In the book of Ruth, for example, Ruth herself is a round character, whereas her sister-in-law Orphah is a flat character. Even Naomi is a relatively flat character.
  • Hierarchy of characters: A listing analysis of the characters in a story, from the major, round characters (often called the protagonists) who play a major role, through to the subordinate, flat characters, who often simply play walk-on parts
  • Focalisation: a technical word for the perception of the events that the narrator chooses to show. The characters might be shown as revealing their inner thoughts or feelings (internal focalisation) or what the reader can see the character doing (external focalisation) or even as revealing more than the character her/himself knows (zero focalisation) 

  • QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Elective  48917   National Diploma: Theology and Ministry  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Elective  62609   National Diploma: Theology and Ministry  Level 6  NQF Level 06  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 



    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.