All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Describe and implement a Christian management philosophy in the Church in the light of one's theological perspective |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
115956 | Describe and implement a Christian management philosophy in the Church in the light of one's theological perspective | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Christian Theology and Ministry | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | Religious and Ethical Foundations of Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will be useful to people who wish to understand and implement management theory within a local church context.
People credited with this unit standard are able to analyse a Christian management philosophy, analyse the relationship between a preferred theological perspective and the management philosophy, implement systems that ensure effective management and administration of a Church, define the distinctive characteristics of a Christian work environment in relation to other work environments; and devise a strategy and plan for establishing and maintaining a Christian work environment. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners are already competent in terms of the following outcomes or areas of learning when starting to learn towards this unit standard:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The following scope and context applies to the whole unit standard:
Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Analyse a Christian management philosophy. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Four components of that philosophy; three Christian beliefs and values which contribute to it. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The analysis is consistent with representative accounts of the management philosophy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The analysis exhibits connected thought, the reasoning of the person seeking credit, and the weighting of evidence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The analysis establishes the conceptual relationship between the philosophy and the Christian beliefs and values on which it is based. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The analysis accounts for management practices that emerge from the management philosophy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The analysis accounts for the distinctive emphasis of the philosophy. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Analyse the relationship between a preferred theological perspective and the management philosophy. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Preferred theological perspective may include but is not limited to the preference of - the person seeking credit, theological school of thought, provider, church, denomination, any combination; a theological perspective must be recognised by theologians and/or biblical scholars, and may arise from - a selected school of thought, denominational or cultural context, a theological movement, any combination. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The analysis is located within an articulation of the preferred theological perspective. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
An identification and justification of at least three assumptions on which that perspective is founded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The analysis takes account of representative accounts of the preferred theological perspective, and of the selected management philosophy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The analysis establishes the relationship between the preferred theological perspective and the selected management philosophy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The analysis exhibits connected thought, the reasoning of the person seeking credit, and the weighing of evidence. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Define the distinctive characteristics of a Church work environment in relation. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Define the distinctive characteristics of a Church work environment in relation to other work environments. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
A Christian work environment and at least two other work environments, the same two throughout. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The definition identifies significant features of work environments and practices in keeping with sources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Sources must include but are not limited to - authoritative texts, published reviews, supervised observation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The definition draws conclusions about the overall impact of the work environments on their constituency. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Constituency must include employees and may include but is not limited to: customers, people for whom a service is performed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The definition accounts for the distinctive characteristics of a Christian Church work environment. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Devise a strategy for establishing and maintaining a effective management and administrative system. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Devise a strategy for establishing and maintaining a effective management and administrative system within a Church. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The strategy and plan are consistent with the characteristics of a distinctly Christian work environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The strategy and plan are supported by the Christian philosophy of management. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Evidence can be gathered from any of the following sources - texts, reports, data collected from supervised observation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The strategy and plan comply with the legislative requirements related to workplace practices. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The strategy and plan are consistent with Christian ethics and values. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The strategy and plan are devised with respect to the diversity and number of staff employed in the workplace. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The strategy and plan incorporate procedures for evaluating effectiveness after implementation. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Moderation Option: |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The following essential embedded knowledge will be assessed through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the stipulated assessment criteria. Candidates are unlikely to achieve all the specific outcomes, to the standards described in the assessment criteria, without knowledge of the listed embedded knowledge. This means that for the most part, the possession or lack of the knowledge can be directly inferred from the quality of the candidate's performance. Where direct assessment of knowledge is required, assessment criteria have been included in the body of the unit standard.
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in relation to Church management and administration. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others and in teams to facilitate effective administration and management of a Church. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively within a Church. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information with regards to management philosophy. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Understand the world as a set of inter-related parts of a system. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full development of oneself and the formation of a community. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors should keep the following general principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:
The following particular issues should be taken into consideration when assessing against this unit standard: |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Definition of Terms:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 48917 | National Diploma: Theology and Ministry | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 62609 | National Diploma: Theology and Ministry | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |