All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Strategise church reform on historical principles |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116029 | Strategise church reform on historical principles | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Christian Theology and Ministry | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | Religious and Ethical Foundations of Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will be useful to people who wish to identify structural and ideological processes through which the Church has been reformed in the past, and want to apply these processes to the contemporary Church in areas where reform is needed.
People credited with this unit standard are able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The credit calculation is based on the assumption that learners are already competent in terms of the following outcomes or areas of learning when starting to learn towards this unit standard:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Describe the context and processes of reform in historical perspective. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The religious, social and political characteristics of the period can be identified and summarised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
One specific period of Church reform e.g. 16th century, 18th century Evangelical revivals, 20th century rise of Pentecostalism. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The causes and triggers of reform, as well as resistance to reform can be identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Multiple causes are required for a complete answer. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The geographical and chronological loci of the period of reform can be correctly located. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the church in the period under review. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A simple SWOT analysis or the equivalent can be provided. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The critical information is based on sound historical and theological judgement, and not on denominational, religious or cultural prejudice. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Produce a reform strategy based on the description of reform in history and the analysis. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Produce a reform strategy based on the description of reform in history and the analysis of strengths and weaknesses of the church in periods of reform. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The strategy accurately reflects the context being analysed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The strategy is structured, feasible and logical. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Apply the reform strategy to a contemporary church context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A specific real or hypothetical modern church setting is described in which reform is needed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Reasons are given for the need for reform. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
An explanation of how the strategy could be applied in the chosen context is given. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Moderation Option: |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The following essential embedded knowledge will be assessed through assessment of the specific outcomes in terms of the stipulated assessment criteria. Candidates are unlikely to achieve all the specific outcomes, to the standards described in the assessment criteria, without knowledge of the listed embedded knowledge. This means that for the most part, the possession or lack of the knowledge can be directly inferred from the quality of the candidate's performance. Where direct assessment of knowledge is required, assessment criteria have been included in the body of the unit standard.
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
This unit standard promotes, in particular, the following critical cross-field outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems: through analysing and proposing solutions to church needs for reform. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively: through planning a strategy. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information: through the processes of historical research and weighing of information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding the world as a set of related systems: by identifying connections between the socio-economic, political, economic, religious and ideological worlds of the selected historical period. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors should keep the following general principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Definition of Terms:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 48917 | National Diploma: Theology and Ministry | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 62609 | National Diploma: Theology and Ministry | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |