All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Develop the skills of a work team |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
12458 | Develop the skills of a work team | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of manufacturing and engineering.
The learning outcomes in this unit standard also contribute to the exit level outcomes required for various manufacturing and engineering qualifications. Qualifying learners can demonstrate an understanding of the process of skills development and enhancement. They are able to use this to identify skills gaps and develop the skills of their work team. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for team work.
The credits allocated to this unit standard assume that a learner has already learned to |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The specific outcomes reflected above are to be performed in collaboration with the human resources/training departments and skills development facilitator. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Discuss and explain the concept of skills development and associated individual and team skills |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Discuss and explain the concept of skills development and associated individual and team skills development plans |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. An understanding of the concept of skills development and associated personal and team skills development plans is demonstrated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Personal and team skills development plans are generated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Team members are trained where required |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of new learning on individuals and the team is reported |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Determine areas for improvement in performance and assess team members for skills gaps |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. An understanding of the concept of skills development and associated personal and team skills development plans is demonstrated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Personal and team skills development plans are generated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Team members are trained where required |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of new learning on individuals and the team is reported |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Arrange individual and team skills development plans and programmes |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. An understanding of the concept of skills development and associated personal and team skills development plans is demonstrated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Personal and team skills development plans are generated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Team members are trained where required |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of new learning on individuals and the team is reported |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Request training or other interventions |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. An understanding of the concept of skills development and associated personal and team skills development plans is demonstrated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Personal and team skills development plans are generated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Team members are trained where required |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of new learning on individuals and the team is reported |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Support team members in implementing new learning |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. An understanding of the concept of skills development and associated personal and team skills development plans is demonstrated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Personal and team skills development plans are generated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Team members are trained where required |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of new learning on individuals and the team is reported |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Assess and evaluate the impact of new learning on individuals and the team |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. An understanding of the concept of skills development and associated personal and team skills development plans is demonstrated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Personal and team skills development plans are generated |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Team members are trained where required |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of new learning on individuals and the team is reported |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators
1. Explanations are given in a clear manner using appropriate examples from learner's own experience 2. Skills gaps are accurately assessed 3. Training recommended is appropriate to the needs of individuals and the team 4. Alternative solutions to training are sought where a skills deficiency is not the cause of a performance problem 5. Team members are supported in the application of their new learning in the work situation 6. The impact of new learning is accurately assessed and evaluated Understanding confirmed 1. Respond to 'what if' and 'why' questions covering: |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assuror (ETQA) who has jurisdiction over this field of learning.
The assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area. The learner can be assessed in the language of his/her choice although if s/he has to report incidents or conditions to some one else, s/he will be assessed on his/her ability to report in the language commonly used in the working environment. The learner will be assessed in the workplace or by simulation, but can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that are not produced in the workplace or by the RPL process. The learner can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
1. Purpose of:
2. Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties: 3. Processes and events: 4. Procedures and techniques: 5. Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: 6. Theory: rules, principles, laws: 7. Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 23281 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Tooling Manufacture | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-10-22 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 58025 | National Certificate: CNC Production Machining | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 66489 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Foundry Operations | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2013-11-07 | MERSETA |
Elective | 91925 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Machining and Tooling | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 23256 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Fitting and Machining | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-10-22 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 23279 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Machining | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-10-22 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 36153 | National Certificate: Polymer Composite Fabrication | Level 4 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 21007 | National Certificate: Automotive component manufacturing and assembly | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-11-01 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 78943 | National Certificate: Autotronics | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 22861 | National Certificate: Autotronics | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 58883 | National Certificate: Fluid Power | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 23260 | National Certificate: Industrial Rubber Manufacturing: Mixing OR Extruding OR Moulding OR Calendaring | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 22773 | National Certificate: Mechatronics | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2011-02-16 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 49448 | National Certificate: Plastics Manufacturing | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 20891 | National Certificate: Plastics Manufacturing | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2005-04-13 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 57122 | National Certificate: Printing and Manufacture of Packaging | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2015-06-30 | FPMSETA |
Elective | 49469 | National Diploma: Complex Procurement | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | |
Elective | 58601 | National Certificate: Land Transport Planning | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | LG SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |