All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED QUALIFICATION THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability |
SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
64670 | National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
Task Team - Public Fin Oversight & Accountability | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
PSETA - Public Service Sector Education and Training Authority | OQSF - Occupational Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
National Certificate | Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Public Administration | ||
ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
Undefined | 128 | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Regular-Unit Stds Based |
REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
SAQA 06120/18 | 2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
Purpose:
Oversight and accountability are elementary principles of good governance. The purpose of this qualification is to provide members of oversight and accounts committees with a training standard that will ultimately enable them to more effectively discharge their oversight duties. Qualifying learners will understand the multi-faceted context wherein which oversight and accounts committees operate. Qualifying learners will be empowered to scrutinise whether government and public departments spend funds, which is allocated to them, in an efficient, effective and ethical manner while applying sound financial management and principles. Qualifying learners will have an in-depth understanding of what is expected of serving committee members and have the practical skills necessary to prioritise, select and apply methodologies or strategies related to the relevant context or situation; delegate and manage the gathering of information; interrogate the information compiled; formulate and direct questions during a hearing and make informed decisions and recommendations to the respective committees and the legislatures. The qualifying learner will be able to: Rationale: Oversight and accountability committees are charged with the financial oversight of government and public departments. Oversight and accountability committees are found respectively at national, provincial and local level. This qualification meets the specific needs of the sector by providing training standards for committee members in good governance, public finance management, execution of oversight duties and ensuring compliance with relevant legislation. This Qualification is aligned to the Association of Public Accounts Committees strategic imperative in the attainment of the organisation's envisaged capacity building objectives. This Qualification will promote sound, accountable and transparent governance to improve the quality and performance of the public accounts committees in South Africa. Further it has been purpose-built for the Public Administration sub-field, the Financial Oversight and Accountability Sector and oversight committee member. This Qualification contributes to an integrated National Qualifications Framework; provides for access and mobility to learning; enhances the quality of training within the public oversight and accountability; allows for the redress of the past through Recognition of prior Learning and contributes to the development of the learner. This Qualification is intended for learners who are members of the national, provincial or municipal legislator and who have been identified to serve, or who are serving on public oversight committees at their respective legislative level. These members come from very diverse historical and academic backgrounds and educational levels vary drastically. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the learner has the following knowledge and skills:
Recognition of Prior Learning: This Qualification makes the Recognition of Prior Learning possible, if the learner is able to demonstrate competence in the knowledge, skills, values and attitudes implicit in this Marketing Qualification. Recognition of Prior Learning will be done by means of an Integrated Assessment. This Recognition of Prior Learning may allow: All recognition of Prior Learning is subject to quality assurance by the relevant accredited Education, Training, Quality, and Assurance Body and is conducted by a registered workplace assessor. Because the standards are only core and fundamental, these standards may have been acquired in a range of economic sectors and these will be recognizes as appropriate. Access to the Qualification: There is an open access to this qualification, keeping in mind the "Learning Assumed to be in Place". |
RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
Y |
QUALIFICATION RULES |
The Qualification consists of a Fundamental, a Core and an Elective Component.
To be awarded the Qualification learners are required to obtain a minimum of 128 credits as detailed below. Fundamental Component: Core Component: Elective Component: |
EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
1. Scrutinise public expenditure to determine accountability of the executive.
2. Ensure good governance and ethical practices and adherence to public finance management principles. 3. Enforce adherence to legislative requirements. 4. Make recommendations for corrective action. Critical Cross-Field Outcomes: This qualification promotes, in particular, the following Critical Cross-Field Outcomes: Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when: Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during: Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when: Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when: Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain: Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others when: Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when: |
ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
1.1 Departmental expenditure is analysed in order to determine its linkage to budgets. 1.2 Budgets are analysed in order to link to. 1.3 Reports are analysed making use of financial management and accounting principles and procedures in order to inform recommendations. 1.4 Specific legislative requirements are applied in checking compliance in the public sector. 1.5 Public sector ethical practices are strengthened through the execution of oversight duties in a non-partisan manner in order to enforce accountability. 1.6 Reports are critically evaluated during scrutiny processes in preparation for hearings in order to facilitate informed decision making and the formulation of recommendations. Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: 2.1 Duties and responsibilities are discharged ethically and in accordance with the roles and responsibilities of the various oversight structures and their specific mandates. 2.2 Oversight processes are implemented so as to take into consideration the environmental factors that impact on decision making. 2.3 Good governance principles are applied so as to ensure effective oversight of public finance management practices. Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: 3.1 Relevant legislative parameters are applied during the oversight processes. 3.2 Decisions are made on the basis of the identified legislation applicable to a specific context. 3.3 Financial management, budgeting and auditing principles are promoted in order to ensure effective use of resources. 3.4 Information is gathered in preparation for public hearings. 3.5 Enforcement activities are planned in order to strengthen effective oversight practices. Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4: 4.1 Ethical principles, standards and professional conduct are adhered to when exercising oversight duties and responsibilities during public hearings. 4.2 Protocols, mandates and powers are exercised in accordance with the legislative framework. 4.3 Oversight hearings are conducted in order to enforce legislative requirements. 4.4 Information gathered during the scrutiny process is analysed in order to formulate and make informed recommendations to parliament, provincial legislatures and councils. 4.5 Executive responses of resolutions tabled in legislature are evaluated and monitored to effect accountability and complete the oversight process. Integrated Assessment: Because assessment practices must be open, transparent, fair, valid, and reliable and ensure that no learner is disadvantaged in any way whatsoever, an integrated assessment approach is incorporated into the Qualification. Learning, teaching and assessment are inextricably linked. Whenever possible, the assessment of knowledge, skills, attitudes and values shown in the unit standards should be integrated. A variety of methods must be used in assessment and tools and activities must be appropriate to the context in which the learner is working. Where it is not possible to assess the learner in the workplace or on-the-job, simulations, case studies, role-plays and other similar techniques should be used to provide a context appropriate to the assessment. The term 'Integrated Assessment' implies that theoretical and practical components should be assessed together. During integrated assessments the assessor should make use of formative and summative assessment methods and assess combinations of practical, applied, foundational and reflective competencies. Assessors and moderators should make use of a range of formative and summative assessment methods. Assessors should assess and give credit for the evidence of learning that has already been acquired through formal, informal and non-formal learning and work experience. Assessment should ensure that all Specific Outcomes, Essential Embedded Knowledge and Critical Cross-Field Outcomes are assessed. The assessment of the Critical Cross-Field Outcomes should be integrated with the assessment of Specific Outcomes and Essential Embedded Knowledge. |
INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
Best Practice:
Countries selected for the International Comparability are Malawi, Bangladesh, Canada and Australia. These countries surveyed have developed related qualifications or learning programmes in the field of general public financial management, accounting, auditing and oversight targeting the general public, members of parliament and parliamentary officials. Malawi: The University of Malawi provides a training programme for members of parliament supported by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA). This project consisted of six three- week training courses over a two-year period, where the aim was to provide Members of Parliament (MPs) with knowledge of priority national issues, training in how to function effectively in Parliament and how to represent and put forth the needs of their constituencies. Training was given at two levels, one tailor-made for MPs with higher education (tertiary level) and one for MPs with basic education. The training focused on four cluster areas: Findings: The National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 compares favourably to the University of Malawi's parliamentary programme in terms of the cluster areas of communication and language skills, democracy, governance and human rights and financial analysis and economic affairs. It was however felt un-necessary to include gender relations and issues as this is handled extensively during short training programmes at the respective legislatures. Bangladesh: The Bangladesh Institute of Parliamentary Studies developed a programme for Members of the Bangladesh Parliament and Parliament Secretariat. The course consists of a total of nine modules, each covering specific issues of relevance to the practices and procedures of the Parliament of Bangladesh. The modules of the training course are as follows: Findings: The National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 compares favourably in terms of Modules 5, 6 and 7 in that these aspects are included in this Qualification. The other Modules need not be included in this Qualification as they are included in the in-house training of each political parties legislature candidates. Canada: The School of Graduate Studies at the University of Toronto, offers a Master's Certificate Programme in Public Finances and Governance. The following two models are taken as core courses: Findings: The National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 differs from the Master's Certificate Programme in Public Finances and Governance in that t is very specific in terms of occupational learning whereas the Master's Certificate Programme in Public Finances and Governance is very academically based. The National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 provides the learner with the contextualised knowledge and skills required to conduct their duties as part of an oversight committee. Australia: The School of Economic at the University of Adelaide in Australia offers an undergraduate course in Economics and Financial Management for members of parliament that do not have a financial or economic background when taking up their tenure. Economic and financial courses can be selected from the following list: The La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia has developed a Financial Oversight Programme in conjunction with the Australian Parliament and covers the following aspects in its programme: Findings: The National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 differs from the undergraduate course in Economics and Financial Management in that it is very specific in terms of occupational learning whereas the undergraduate course in Economics and Financial Management is very academically based and theoretical of nature. The National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 provides the learner with the contextualised knowledge and skills required to conduct their duties as part of an oversight committee. However the National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 compares very favourably to La Trobe University's Financial Oversight Programme in terms of the aspects of oversight, public finance management and legislation. It was however felt un-necessary to include rules of parliament as this is handled extensively during short training programmes for Members of Parliament and is not applicable to provincial and local oversight committee members. Summary: Of the above mentioned courses and programmes only three, the University of Malawi's parliamentary programme, the Bangladesh Institute of Parliamentary Studies programme and La Trobe University's Financial Oversight Programme, compare favourably to the National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6 as these are also occupationally based programmes based on the competencies that the learners are required to shown during oversight. The University of Toronto's Master's Certificate Programme in Public Finances and Governance and the University of Adelaide undergraduate course in Economics and Financial Management are academic and theoretical programmes which for this reason do not compare favourably to the National Certificate: Public Financial Oversight and Accountability, NQF Level 6. |
ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
This Qualification lends itself to both vertical and horizontal articulation possibilities.
Horizontal articulation is possible with the following Qualifications: Vertical articulation is possible with the following qualifications: |
MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this Qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution that is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
For an applicant to register as an assessor, the applicant needs:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this qualification was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
NOTES |
Range:
Oversight processes include but not limited to planning, information gathering, conducting oversight hearings, making recommendations and evaluating and monitoring responses to and from executive. |
UNIT STANDARDS: |
ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS | |
Core | 120303 | Apply principles of risk management | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
Core | 119346 | Apply sound communication principles in the coordination of selected public sector communications programmes | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 120360 | Demonstrate understanding of financial and accounting principles for public entities | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
Core | 10301 | Complete a research assignment | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 20 |
Core | 260338 | Conduct oversight hearings | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 15 |
Core | 260340 | Discharge oversight responsibilities by using financial tools and instruments to effect accountability in the public sector | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 15 |
Core | 260339 | Utilise reports as an oversight tool | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
Core | 242916 | Strengthen and implement sustainable public sector ethical practices | Level 7 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7 | 8 |
Fundamental | 260341 | Utilise processes within the oversight environment to promote effective corporate governance | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
Elective | 119347 | Analyse and evaluate the impact of macroeconomic data on the operating environment of the public sector | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
Elective | 119343 | Apply operations research principles and tools in the management of project activities and resources | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 15 |
Elective | 230448 | Contribute towards organisation policy development | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
Elective | 119334 | Discuss the selected legislative regulatory framework governing the public sector management and administration environment | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
Elective | 113807 | Draft Legal agreements | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Elective | 116346 | Apply techniques and South African statutes to cash and investment management in a municipal environment | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
Elective | 12138 | Conduct an organisational needs analysis | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
Elective | 365239 | Demonstrate a knowledge of the principles and methodology that underlie the drafting and the processing of legislation. | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | 15 |
Elective | 115590 | Design public participation processes | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 10 |
Elective | 117438 | Inform policy | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 15 |
Elective | 243114 | Manage the implementation of organisational strategies, polices and plans in a Public Sector environment | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 8 |
Elective | 365188 | Practical application of the principles of legislative drafting | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | 10 |
Elective | 242915 | Apply research methodologies in order to compile in a major research report in a public sector context | Level 7 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7 | 12 |
Elective | 114703 | Explain the policies of the African States and SADC countries | Level 7 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7 | 5 |
LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
NONE |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |